Trusting e-voting amid experiences of electoral malpractice: The case of Indian elections

This article constructs explanatory theory on trust in e-voting, a term that refers to the use of stand-alone IT artefacts in voting stations. We study e-voting as a techno-organisational arrangement embedded in the process of elections and the broader socio-economic context of a country. Following a critical realist approach, we apply retroduction and retrodiction principles to build theory by complementing existing studies of e-voting with insights from an in-depth case study of elections in India. First, we seek evidence of trust in e-voting in the responses of the public to the announcement of election results. Then we derive the following four mechanisms of trust creation or loss: the association of e-voting with the production of positive democratic effects; the making of e-voting part of the mission and identity of electoral authorities; the cultivation of a positive public attitude to IT with policies for IT-driven socio-economic development; and, in countries with turbulent political cultures, a clear distinction between the experience of voting as orderly and experiences of malpractice in other election tasks. We suggest that these mechanisms explain the different experience with e-voting of different countries. Attention to them helps in assessing the potential of electoral technologies in countries that are currently adopting them, especially fragile democracies embarking upon e-voting.

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[2]  Peter Evans,et al.  State, capital, and the transformation of dependence: The Brazilian computer case , 1986 .

[3]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[4]  K. Weick ENACTED SENSEMAKING IN CRISIS SITUATIONS[1] , 1988 .

[5]  P. Schmitter,et al.  What Democracy Is. . . and Is Not , 2008 .

[6]  Peter Evans,et al.  Indian informatics in the 1980s: The changing character of state involvement , 1992 .

[7]  Patrick Heller,et al.  Social capital as a product of class mobilization and state intervention: Industrial workers in Kerala, India , 1996 .

[8]  J. Mooij Food policy in India: the importance of electoral politics in policy implementation , 1999 .

[9]  R. Pastor The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: Implications for policy and research , 1999 .

[10]  E. E. Aguilar,et al.  Macroeconomic Conditions, Voter Turnout, and the Working-class/Economically Disadvantaged Party Vote in Developing Countries , 2000 .

[11]  Philip J. Dobson Longitudinal Case Research: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2001 .

[12]  René Véron,et al.  The “New” Kerala Model: Lessons for Sustainable Development , 2001 .

[13]  Dimitris Gritzalis Principles and requirements for a secure e-voting system , 2002 .

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in Eighteen Latin American Countries , 2002 .

[15]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  The Life and Death of the Great Amsterdam Digital City , 2003, Digital Cities.

[16]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  Building Secure Elections: E-Voting, Security, and Systems Theory , 2004 .

[19]  Anne-Marie Oostveen,et al.  Trust, Identity, and the Effects of Voting Technologies on Voting Behavior , 2005 .

[20]  Andrew Reynolds,et al.  A framework for the systematic study of election quality , 2005 .

[21]  Policing Elections in India , 2005 .

[22]  Shirin Madon,et al.  Governance lessons from the experience of telecentres in Kerala , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Studying Elections: Data Quality and Pitfalls in Measuring the Effects of Voting Technologies , 2005 .

[24]  Matthew Longshore Smith,et al.  Overcoming theory-practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[25]  A. Blais WHAT AFFECTS VOTER TURNOUT , 2006 .

[26]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[27]  Wolter Pieters,et al.  Acceptance of Voting Technology: Between Confidence and Trust , 2006, iTrust.

[28]  W. Orlikowski Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[29]  Ian O. Angell,et al.  Reflections on the Academic Policy Analysis Process and the UK Identity Cards Scheme , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[30]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Michael Bratton Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns , 2008 .

[32]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Evaluating Electronic Voting Systems Equipped with Voter-Verified Paper Records , 2008, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[33]  Dan S. Wallach,et al.  Electronic voting machines versus traditional methods: improved preference, similar performance , 2008, CHI.

[34]  R. Diwakar Voter Turnout in the Indian States: An Empirical Analysis , 2008 .

[35]  Fran Tonkiss Trust, confidence and economic crisis , 2009 .

[36]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Social outsourcing as a development tool: The impact of outsourcing IT services to women's social enterprises in Kerala , 2009 .

[37]  A. Verma Situational Prevention and Elections in India , 2009 .

[38]  T. Falleti,et al.  Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis , 2009 .

[39]  Lahra Smith Explaining violence after recent elections in Ethiopia and Kenya , 2009 .

[40]  G. Easton Critical realism in case study research , 2010 .

[41]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Technology, Organization, and Structure - A Morphogenetic Approach , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[42]  Eric Wustrow,et al.  Security analysis of India's electronic voting machines , 2010, CCS '10.

[43]  Richard Heeks Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development , 2010 .

[44]  Anne-Marie Oostveen,et al.  Outsourcing Democracy: Losing Control of E-Voting in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[45]  R. Alvarez,et al.  The Impact of New Technologies on Voter Confidence in Latin America: Evidence from E-Voting Experiments in Argentina and Colombia , 2011 .

[46]  R. Chaturvedi “SOMEHOW IT HAPPENED”: Violence, Culpability, and the Hindu Nationalist Community , 2011 .

[47]  Staffan Darnolf,et al.  Electoral malpractice , 2012 .

[48]  Michael W. Sances,et al.  Partisanship and Voter Confidence, 2000-2012 , 2012 .

[49]  Stefan Dercon,et al.  Triggers and Characteristics of the 2007 Kenyan Electoral Violence , 2012 .

[50]  Amit Ahuja,et al.  Why the Poor Vote in India: “If I Don’t Vote, I Am Dead to the State” , 2012 .

[51]  Donald E. Wynn,et al.  Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems , 2012, MIS Q..

[52]  J. Kallinikos Form, function and matter: crossing the border of materiality , 2012 .

[53]  Architecture of Surveillance , 2013 .

[54]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Critical Realism in Information Systems Research , 2013, MIS Q..

[55]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Methodological Implications of Critical Realism for Mixed-Methods Research , 2013, MIS Q..

[56]  P. Norris The new research agenda studying electoral integrity , 2013 .

[57]  P. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World , 2013 .

[58]  Yasmin Merali,et al.  The Broader Context for ICT4D Projects: A Morphogenetic Analysis , 2013, MIS Q..

[59]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Explaining Trust in IT-Mediated Elections: A Case Study of E-Voting in Brazil , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Social Mechanisms for Causal Explanation in Social Theory Based IS Research , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[61]  P. Norris Why Electoral Integrity Matters: Frontmatter , 2014 .

[62]  P. Jensen,et al.  Poverty and Vote Buying: Survey-Based Evidence from Africa , 2014 .

[63]  Thomas Fujiwara,et al.  Voting Technology, Political Responsiveness, and Infant Health: Evidence From Brazil , 2015 .

[64]  Silvia Masiero,et al.  Redesigning the Indian Food Security System through E-Governance: The Case of Kerala , 2015 .

[65]  G. Piccolino Making Democracy Legible? Voter Registration and the Permanent Electronic Electoral List in Benin , 2015 .

[66]  Vanessa Teague,et al.  The New South Wales iVote System: Security Failures and Verification Flaws in a Live Online Election , 2015, VoteID.

[67]  C. Zucco,et al.  Trading Old Errors for New Errors? The Impact of Electronic Voting Technology on Party Label Votes in Brazil , 2016 .

[68]  G. Piccolino Infrastructural state capacity for democratization? Voter registration and identification in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana compared , 2016 .

[69]  Rodney Smith Confidence in paper-based and electronic voting channels: evidence from Australia , 2016 .

[70]  Kathy McGrath,et al.  Identity Verification and Societal Challenges: Explaining the Gap Between Service Provision and Development Outcomes , 2016, MIS Q..

[71]  Feng Hao,et al.  DRE-ip: A Verifiable E-Voting Scheme Without Tallying Authorities , 2016, ESORICS.

[72]  R. Khera,et al.  Development ReviewRecent Social Security Initiatives in India , 2017 .

[73]  Richard W. Frank,et al.  How election dynamics shape perceptions of electoral integrity , 2017 .