Intercomparison of inversion algorithms to retrieve rain rate from SSM/I by using an extended validation set over the Mediterranean area

The capability of some inversion algorithms to estimate surface rain rate at the midlatitude basin scale from the Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) data is analyzed. For this purpose, an extended database has been derived from coincident SSM/I images and half-hourly rain rate data obtained from a rain gauge network, placed along the Tiber River basin in Central Italy, during nine years (from 1992 to 2000). The database has been divided in a training set, to calibrate the empirical algorithms, and in a validation one, to compare the results of the considered techniques. The proposed retrieval methods are based on both empirical and physical approaches. Among the empirical methods, a regression, an artificial feedforward neural network, and a Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) inversion have been considered. Three algorithms available in the literature are also included as benchmarks. As physical algorithms, the MAP method and the minimum mean square estimator have been used. Moreover, in order to test the behavior of the algorithms with different kinds of precipitation, a classification of rainy events, based on some statistical parameters derived from rain gauge measurements, has been performed. From this classification, an attempt to identify the type of event from radiometric data has been carried out. The purposes of this paper are to determine whether the use of an extended training set, referred to a limited geographical area, can improve the SSM/I skill in rain detection and estimation and, mainly, to confirm the validity of the physical approach adopted in previous works. It will be shown that, among all the estimators, the neural network presents the best performances and that the physical techniques provide results only slightly worse than those given by empirical methods, but with the well-known advantage of an easy application to different geographical zones and different sensors.

[1]  W. Olson,et al.  An Assessment of the First- and Second-Generation Navy Operational Precipitation Retrieval Algorithms , 1998 .

[2]  James P. Hollinger,et al.  SSM/I instrument evaluation , 1990 .

[3]  Ye Hong,et al.  Separation of Convective and Stratiform Precipitation Using Microwave Brightness Temperature , 1999 .

[4]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  A physical-statistical approach to match passive microwave retrieval of rainfall to Mediterranean climatology , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Li Li,et al.  Rain rate distributions for China from hourly rain gauge data , 1998 .

[6]  F. Marzano,et al.  Use of cloud model microphysics for passive microwave-based precipitation retrieval : Significance of consistency between model and measurement manifolds , 1998 .

[7]  Ye Hong,et al.  A Texture-Polarization Method for Estimating Convective–Stratiform Precipitation Area Coverage from Passive Microwave Radiometer Data , 2001 .

[8]  Eric A. Smith,et al.  Foundations for statistical-physical precipitation retrieval from passive microwave satellite measurements. I: Brightness-temperature properties of a time-dependent cloud-radiation model , 1992 .

[9]  Ralph Ferraro,et al.  The Development of SSM/I Rain-Rate Retrieval Algorithms Using Ground-Based Radar Measurements , 1995 .

[10]  Nazzareno Pierdicca,et al.  Bayesian Techniques in Remote Sensing , 2002 .

[11]  Nazzareno Pierdicca,et al.  Precipitation retrieval from spaceborne microwave radiometers based on maximum a a posteriori probability estimation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Eric A. Smith,et al.  Foundations for statistical-physical precipitation retrieval from passive microwave satellite measurements. II: Emission-source and generalized weighting-function properties of a time-dependent cloud-radiation model , 1993 .

[13]  Grant W. Petty,et al.  The status of satellite-based rainfall estimation over land☆ , 1995 .

[14]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  David A. Short,et al.  A Probability Distribution Model for Rain Rate , 1994 .

[16]  Dong-Bin Shin,et al.  The Evolution of the Goddard Profiling Algorithm (GPROF) for Rainfall Estimation from Passive Microwave Sensors , 2001 .

[17]  Christian Kummerow,et al.  A simplified scheme for obtaining precipitation and vertical hydrometeor profiles from passive microwave sensors , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  M. Kitchen,et al.  Weather Radar Performance at Long RangeSimulated and Observed , 1993 .

[19]  G. Tripoli A Nonhydrostatic Mesoscale Model Designed to Simulate Scale Interaction , 1992 .

[20]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Remotely sensing cloud properties from microwave radiometric observations by using a modeled cloud database , 1998 .

[21]  Julius T. Tou,et al.  Pattern Recognition Principles , 1974 .

[22]  Grant W. Petty,et al.  Nimbus-7 SMMR precipitation observations calibrated against surface radar during TAMEX , 1992 .

[23]  Eric A. Smith,et al.  Bayesian estimation of precipitating cloud parameters from combined measurements of spaceborne microwave radiometer and radar , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  Grant W. Petty,et al.  Validation and Intercomparison of SSM/I Rain-Rate Retrieval Methods over the Continental United States , 1998 .

[25]  Mourad Barkat,et al.  Signal detection and estimation , 1991 .

[26]  Frank S. Marzano,et al.  Effects of Degraded Sensor Resolution upon Passive Microwave Precipitation Retrievals of Tropical Rainfall , 1998 .