The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group

Quality of life (QOL) assessments that are easily administered and which do not impose a great burden on the respondent are needed for use in large epidemiological surveys, clinical settings and clinical trials. Using data from the WHOQOL-BREF field trials, the objectives of this work are to examine the performance of the WHOQOL-BREF as an integrated instrument, and to test its main psychometric properties. The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100 assessment. Its psychometric properties were analysed using cross-sectional data obtained from a survey of adults carried out in 23 countries (n = 11,830). Sick and well respondents were sampled from the general population, as well as from hospital, rehabilitation and primary care settings, serving patients with physical and mental disorders and with respect to quotas of important socio-demographic variables. The WHOQOL-BREF self-assessment was completed, together with socio-demographic and health status questions. Analyses of internal consistency, item–total correlations, discriminant validity and construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis, indicate that the WHOQOL-BREF has good to excellent psychometric properties of reliability and performs well in preliminary tests of validity. These results indicate that overall, the WHOQOL-BREF is a sound, cross-culturally valid assessment of QOL, as reflected by its four domains: physical, psychological, social and environment.

[1]  S. Wood-Dauphinée,et al.  Assessing quality of life in clinical research: from where have we come and where are we going? , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  M. Power,et al.  Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment , 1998 .

[3]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[4]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1997, JAMA.

[5]  S. Skevington Advancing cross-cultural research on quality of life: Observations drawn from the WHOQOL development , 2002, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[7]  M. Sprangers Quality of life assessment: International perspectives , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  C. McHorney,et al.  Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. , 1999, Annual review of public health.

[9]  B. Gandek,et al.  MAP-R for windows: multitrait / multi-item analysis program - revised user's guide. , 1997 .

[10]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[11]  J. Flory,et al.  What are quality of life measurements measuring? , 1998, BMJ.

[12]  S. Saxena,et al.  An Approach to Response Scale Development for Cross-Cultural Questionnaires , 1997 .

[13]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. XII. How to use articles about health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1997, JAMA.

[14]  S. Skevington Measuring quality of life in Britain: introducing the WHOQOL-100. , 1999, Journal of psychosomatic research.