Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures

Our intuition that we richly represent the visual details of our environment is illusory. When viewing a scene, we seem to use detailed representations of object properties and interobject relations to achieve a sense of continuity across views. Yet, several recent studies show that human observers fail to detect changes to objects and object properties when localized retinal information signaling a change is masked or eliminated (e.g., by eye movements). However, these studies changed arbitrarily chosen objects which may have been outside the focus of attention. We draw on previous research showing the importance of spatiotemporal information for tracking objects by creating short motion pictures in which objects in both arbitrary locations and the very center of attention were changed. Adult observers failed to notice changes in both cases, even when the sole actor in a scene transformed into another person across an instantaneous change in camera angle (or “cut”).

[1]  M. Potter Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[2]  G. McConkie,et al.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  H. Intraub Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. , 1981 .

[4]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Failure to integrate visual information from successive fixations , 1983 .

[5]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Failure to integrate information from successive fixations. , 1983, Science.

[6]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Representation of motion and space in video and cinematic displays , 1986 .

[8]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Visual masking and visual integration across saccadic eye movements. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  E. Spelke,et al.  Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy , 1995 .

[11]  G. Brelstaff,et al.  Is the Richness of Our Visual World an Illusion? Transsaccadic Memory for Complex Scenes , 1995, Perception.

[12]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Mud splashes render picture changes invisible , 1996 .

[13]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[16]  J. Grimes On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. , 1996 .

[17]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .