The Cyclicality of Mark-Ups and Profit Margins: Some Evidence for Manufacturing and Services

This paper uses industry and firm data to look at price cost mark-ups and firm profit margins in UK manufacturing and services. In particular it examines how they behave over the business cycle. It has two main findings. First, the estimated average mark-ups and the profit margin results both suggest that there is imperfect competition in manufacturing and services. Second, mark-ups are pro-cyclical, as are profit margins even after allowing for movements in their standard determinants. This suggests that price pressures may increase during recovery periods and decrease during recessions. One possible explanation for this is Kreps and Scheinkman's argument that the pro-cyclicality of capacity constraints means that firms move between Cournot and Bertrand competition over the cycle. The finding that mark-ups are pro- cyclical also raises doubts about macroeconomic models that assume that demand shocks may affect employment via counter-cyclical mark-ups.

[1]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[2]  Keith Cowling,et al.  PRICE-COST MARGINS AND MARKET STRUCTURE , 1976 .

[3]  R. Hall Market Structure and Macroeconomic Fluctuations , 1987 .

[4]  Martin L. Weitzman,et al.  Increasing Returns and the Foundations of Unemployment Theory , 1982 .

[5]  R. Glenn Hubbard,et al.  Business Cycles and the Relationship between Concentration and Price-Cost Margins , 1986 .

[6]  Garth Saloner,et al.  A Supergame-Theoretic Model of Price Wars during Booms , 1986 .

[7]  M. Bils,et al.  Pricing in a Customer Market , 1989 .

[8]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes , 1983 .

[9]  Robert E. Hall,et al.  The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  Profit Margins and the Business Cycle: Evidence from UK Manufacturing Firms , 1993 .

[11]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Market Structure and Price-Cost Margins , 1982 .

[12]  J. Symons,et al.  Ten Years of Mrs. T. , 1989, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[13]  R. Porter,et al.  NONCOOPERATIVE COLLUSION UNDER IMPERFECT PRICE INFORMATION , 1984 .

[14]  R. Hall,et al.  Invariance Properties of Solow&Apos;S Productivity Residual , 1989 .

[15]  Julio J. Rotemberg,et al.  Markups and the Business Cycle , 1991, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[16]  S. Fischer,et al.  Lectures on Macroeconomics , 1972 .

[17]  R. Layard,et al.  THE THATCHER MIRACLE , 1989 .

[18]  Dirk Pilat,et al.  Mark-Up Ratios in Manufacturing Industries: Estimates for 14 OECD Countries , 1996 .

[19]  W. Roeger Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for U.S. Manufacturing , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Dennis C. Mueller,et al.  The Dynamics of company profits : an international comparison , 1990 .

[21]  C. Morrison Market Power, Economic Profitability and Productivity Growth Measurement: An Integrated Structural Approach , 1990 .

[22]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[23]  J. Haskel,et al.  PRICE, MARGINAL COST AND THE BUSINESS CYCLE† , 1995 .