Hypersonic Stability and Transition Experiments on Blunt Cones and a Generic Scramjet Forebody

Purdue University continues to develop a 9.5-inch Mach-6 Ludwieg tube, which presently operates with quiet flow only at low Reynolds number. Efforts towards achieving high quiet Reynolds numbers are reported. Measurements of stability and transition are also being carried out, using the existing conventional-noise Mach-6 flow. Model geometries include blunt round cones at zero and non-zero angle of attack, and the Hyper2000 forebody, which is generic for the Hyper-X class of airbreathing cruise vehicles. The transition literature for these cases is reviewed. Stationary streamwise-vortex instabilities are induced on the Hyper2000 using small roughness elements. Their growth is measured with temperature-sensitive paints. Temperature-paints measurements on a sharp cone at angle of attack show preliminary indications of the stationary crossflow vortices. Finally, a preliminary hot-wire profile was obtained on a blunt cone in a single tunnel run using a newly automated traverse. Hypersonic Transition and Quiet Tunnels Laminar-turbulent transition in hypersonic boundary layers is important for prediction and control of heat transfer, skin friction, and other boundary layer properties. However, the mechanisms leading to transition are still poorly understood, even in lownoise environments. Applications hindered by this ∗Associate Professor. Associate Fellow, AIAA. †Research Assistant. Student Member, AIAA. ‡Research Assistant. Student Member, AIAA. §Research Assistant. Student Member, AIAA. ¶Research Assistant. Student Member, AIAA. Copyright c ©2003 by Steven P. Schneider. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. lack of understanding include reusable launch vehicles [1], high-speed interceptor missiles [2], hypersonic cruise vehicles [3], and ballistic reentry vehicles [4]. Many transition experiments have been carried out in conventional ground-testing facilities over the past 50 years. However, these experiments are contaminated by the high levels of noise that radiate from the turbulent boundary layers normally present on the wind tunnel walls [5]. These noise levels, typically 0.5-1% of the mean, are an order of magnitude larger than those observed in flight [6, 7]. These high noise levels can cause transition to occur an order of magnitude earlier than in flight [5, 7]. In addition, the mechanisms of transition operational in small-disturbance environments can be changed or bypassed altogether in high-noise environments; these changes in the mechanisms change the parametric trends in transition [6]. Only in the last two decades have low-noise supersonic wind tunnels been developed [5, 8]. This development has been difficult, since the test-sectionwall boundary layers must be kept laminar in order to avoid high levels of eddy-Mach-wave acoustic radiation from the normally-present turbulent boundary layers. A Mach 3.5 tunnel was the first to be successfully developed at NASA Langley [9]. Langley then developed a Mach 6 quiet nozzle [10]. Unfortunately, this nozzle was removed from service due to a space conflict. No hypersonic quiet tunnels are presently operational anywhere in the world. The general prediction of transition based on simulations of the transition mechanisms is a very complex and difficult problem. There are several known receptivity mechanisms, several different known forms of instability waves, many different parameters that affect the mean flow and therefore modify the stability properties, and many known nonlinear breakdown mechanisms. The parameter space is large. The scramjet-vehicle forebody and

[1]  D E Boylan,et al.  A Direct Comparison of Analytical and Experimental Surface and Flow-Field Data on a 4-Deg Cone at Incidence in a Hypersonic Stream with Laminar Boundary Layers , 1977 .

[2]  Shann J. Rufer,et al.  Shakedown of the Purdue Mach-6 Quiet-Flow Ludwieg Tube , 2001 .

[3]  John C. Adams,et al.  Three-Dimensional Laminar Boundary-Layer Analysis of Upwash Patterns and Entrained Vortex Formation on Sharp Cones at Angle of Attack. , 1971 .

[4]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Elements of gasdynamics , 1957 .

[5]  T. Kubota,et al.  Experimental investigation of supersonic laminar, two-dimensional boundary-layer separation in a compression corner with and without cooling. , 1967 .

[6]  Stephen P. Wilkinson,et al.  NASA Langley Mach 6 quiet wind-tunnel performance , 1997 .

[7]  Steven P. Schneider,et al.  Mean Flow and Noise Measurements In the Purdue Mach-6 Quiet-Flow , 2001 .

[8]  M. Holden,et al.  Ground test facilities for aerothermal and aero-optical evaluation of hypersonic interceptors , 1992 .

[9]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Aerothermodynamics and Transition in High-Speed Wind Tunnels at NASA Langley , 1990 .

[10]  Steven P. Schneider,et al.  Laminar-Turbulent Transition Research in the Boeing/AFOSR Mach-6 Quiet Tunnel , 2005 .

[11]  Thomas Elias,et al.  Stability studies of planar transition in supersonic flows , 1990 .

[12]  Jack D. Whitfield,et al.  Experiments on roughness effects on cone boundary-layer transition up to Mach 16. , 1969 .

[13]  Ardeshir Hanifi,et al.  Stability Characteristics of 3-D Boundary Layer on a Yawed Cone , 1995 .

[14]  V. Dicristina,et al.  Three-dimensional laminar boundary-layer transition on a sharp 8 degcone at Mach 10 , 1969 .

[15]  Graham V. Candler,et al.  Numerical study of hypersonic boundary layer transition on a blunt body , 1997 .

[16]  George G. Mateer EFFECTS OF WALL COOLING AND ANGLE OF ATTACK ON BOUNDARY-LAYER TRANSITION ON SHARP CONES AT M, = 7.4 , 1972 .

[17]  L. Ericsson Effect of nose bluntness and cone angle on slender-vehicle transition , 1987 .

[18]  Mark S. Reibert,et al.  Effect of Isolated Micron-Sized Roughness on Transition in Swept-Wing Flows , 1999 .

[19]  S. Wilkinson,et al.  Status of NASA Langley quiet flow facility developments , 1994 .

[20]  Kenneth F. Stetson Hypersonic Laminar Boundary Layer Transition. Part 1. Nosetip Bluntness Effects on Cone Frustum Transition. Part 2. Mach 6 Experiments of Transition on a Cone at Angle of Attack , 1982 .

[21]  Anatoly I. Ruban,et al.  An instability in supersonic boundary-layer flow over a compression ramp , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  K. Stetson Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition Experiments , 1980 .

[23]  G. Inger,et al.  Similitude Properties of High-Speed Laminar and Turbulent Boundary-Layer Incipient Separation , 1977 .

[24]  Gary S. Settles,et al.  Supersonic and hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interaction database , 1994 .

[25]  M. C. Fischer,et al.  An experimental investigation of boundary- layer transition on a 10 deg half-angle cone at Mach 6.9 , 1970 .

[26]  Dorothy B. Lee,et al.  Measurements of aerodynamic heat transfer on a 15 degree cone-cylinder-flare configuration in free flight at Mach numbers up to 4.7 , 1958 .

[27]  K. Stetson Nosetip bluntness effects on cone frustum boundary layer transition in hypersonic flow , 1983 .

[28]  A. Martellucci,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Boundary Layer Transition on a Cone at Angle of Attack , 1969 .

[29]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  X-33 Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition , 1999 .

[30]  Dale William Ladoon Wave packets generated by a surface glow discharge on a cone at Mach 4 , 1998 .

[31]  W. R. Grabowsky,et al.  The search for optimum configurations for re-entry vehicles , 1984 .

[32]  Anatoly I. Ruban,et al.  Separation and instability in the hypersonic boundary layer on a cold wall , 1995 .

[33]  Ndaona Chokani,et al.  Effect of angle of attack on hypersonic boundary-layer stability , 1997 .

[34]  Frank K. Lu,et al.  Preliminary surface pressure measurements of transitional, hypersonic shock boundary layer interactions , 1996 .

[35]  Shann J. Rufer,et al.  Hypersonic Transition Research in the Boeing/AFOSR Mach-6 Quiet Tunnel , 2003 .

[36]  S. Pate,et al.  Supersonic Boundary-Layer Transition: Effects of Roughness and Freestream Disturbances , 1971 .

[37]  Doyle Knight,et al.  Shock wave boundary layer interactions in high Mach number flows: A critical survey of current CFD prediction capabilities , 1998 .

[38]  Ndaona Chokani,et al.  Effect of Angle of Attack on Hypersonic , 1997 .

[39]  J. L. Stollery,et al.  Some Viscous Interactions Affecting the Design of Hypersonic Intakes and Nozzles , 1992 .

[40]  Steven P. Schneider,et al.  Effects of High-Speed Tunnel Noise on Laminar-Turbulent Transition , 2000 .

[41]  Eli Reshotko,et al.  A stability study of the developing mixing layer formed by two supersonic laminar streams , 1996 .

[42]  Aleck C. Bond,et al.  Heat Transfer Measured in Free Flight on a Slightly Blunted 25 deg Cone-Cylinder-Flare Configuration at Mach Numbers up to 9.89 , 1958 .

[43]  S. Wagner,et al.  The shock wind tunnel of Stuttgart University - A facility for testing hypersonic vehicles , 1999 .

[44]  A. B. Bailey Effect of boundary-layer transition on center-of-pressure of conical bodies , 1981 .

[45]  M. Holden Experimental studies of the effects of asymmetric transition on the aerothermal characteristics of hypersonic blunted slender cones , 1985 .

[46]  D. H. Rudy,et al.  Effect of angle of attack on boundary-layer transition at Mach 21 , 1971 .

[47]  George G. Mateer The Effect of Angle of Attack on Boundary-Layer Transition on Cones , 1972 .

[48]  G. Leone,et al.  Validation procedure for the analysis of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction problems , 1994 .

[49]  R. H. Korkegi,et al.  Survey of viscous interactions associated with high Mach number flight , 1971 .

[50]  K. Heffner,et al.  Experimental study of transitional axisymmetric shock-boundary layerinteractions at Mach 5 , 1993 .

[51]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Free stream noise and transition measurements in a Mach 3.5 pilot quiet tunnel , 1983 .

[52]  J. Muir,et al.  Experimental investigation of the effects of nose bluntness, free-stream unit Reynolds number, and angle of attack on cone boundary layer transition at a Mach number of 6 , 1972 .

[53]  Scott E. Munro,et al.  Laminar-turbulent transition research in the Purdue Mach-4 Quiet-Flow Ludwieg Tube , 1996 .

[54]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Trip Development for Hyper-X , 2000 .

[55]  A. Demetriades,et al.  TRANSITION IN HIGH-SPEED FREE SHEAR LAYERS , 1990 .

[56]  Kenneth F Stetson Effect of Bluntness and Angle of Attack on Boundary Layer Transition on Cones and Biconic Configurations , 1979 .

[57]  J. B. Mc Devitt,et al.  Upwash patterns on ablating and nonablating cones at hypersonic speeds , 1969 .

[58]  Steven P. Schneider,et al.  Hypersonic Laminar Instability on Round Cones Near Zero Angle of Attack , 2001 .

[59]  Rudolph A. King,et al.  Experimental transition investigation of a free-shear layer above a cavity at Mach 3.5 , 1991 .

[60]  Stefan Hein,et al.  Influence of nose bluntness on boundary-layer instabilities in hypersonic cone flows , 1999 .

[61]  S. Schneider Flight Data for Boundary-Layer Transition at Hypersonic and Supersonic Speeds , 1999 .

[62]  M. Simen,et al.  On the Instability of Hypersonic Flow Past a Pointed Cone - Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Results at Mach 8 - , 1992 .

[63]  W. Haase,et al.  Experimental and computational investigations of hypersonic flow about compression ramps , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[64]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Design and fabrication requirements for low-noise supersonic/hypersonic wind tunnels , 1988 .

[65]  E. Reshotko,et al.  The Blunt Body Paradox — A Case for Transient Growth , 2000 .

[66]  Anatoly A. Maslov Experimental Study of Stability and Transition of Hypersonic Boundary Layer Around Blunted Cone , 2001 .

[67]  Hongwu Zhao,et al.  Stability of Hypersonic Boundary Layers over a Compression Corner , 2002 .

[68]  A. Chpoun Hypersonic Transitional Flow in a Compression Corner in 2D Configuration , 1990 .

[69]  J. J. Ginoux,et al.  Streamwise vortices in reattaching high-speed flows - A suggested approach , 1971 .

[70]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Experimental aerodynamics research on a hypersonic vehicle , 1993 .

[71]  I. E. Beckwith,et al.  Gortler vortices and transition in wall boundary layers of two Mach 5 nozzles , 1981 .

[72]  A. A. Sidorenko,et al.  Experimental investigations of disturbance development in the hypersonic boundary layer on a Conical Model , 2000 .

[73]  Gennaro Cardone,et al.  Viscous interaction phenomena in hypersonic wedge flow , 1995 .

[74]  Steven Schneider Initial shakedown of the Purdue Mach-6 quiet-flow Ludwieg tube , 2000 .

[75]  Roger L. Kimmel,et al.  Example of Second-Mode Instability Dominance at a Mach Number of 5.2 , 1992 .

[76]  W. Haase,et al.  Experimental, analytical, and computational methods applied to hypersonic compression ramp flows , 1994 .

[77]  Kenneth F. Stetson,et al.  Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. III - Sharp cone at angle of attack , 1985 .

[78]  J. Kendall Wind Tunnel Experiments Relating to Supersonic and Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition , 1974 .

[79]  D. Ladoon,et al.  Measurements of controlled wave packets at Mach 4 on a cone at angle of attack , 1998 .

[80]  P. C. Stainback,et al.  Effect of unit Reynolds number, nose bluntness, angle of attack, and roughness on transition on a 5 deg half-angle cone at Mach 8 , 1969 .

[81]  S. Schneider,et al.  Quiet-flow Ludwieg tube for high-speed transition research , 1995 .

[82]  Michael Holden,et al.  Measurements of boundary layer transition on cones at angle of attack for Mach numbers from 11 to 13 , 1995 .

[83]  Joseph G. Marvin,et al.  Perspective on Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation , 1995 .

[84]  Sukumar Chakravarthy,et al.  Computation of laminar hypersonic compression-corner flows , 1991 .