The Importance of Connected Ocean Monitoring Knowledge Systems and Communities

Ocean monitoring will improve outcomes if ways of knowing and priorities from a range of interest groups are successfully integrated. Coastal Indigenous communities hold unique knowledge of the ocean gathered through many generations of inter-dependent living with marine ecosystems. Experiences and observations from living within that system have generated ongoing local and traditional ecological knowledge (LEK and TEK) and Indigenous knowledge (IK) upon which localized sustainable management strategies have been based. Consequently, a comprehensive approach to ocean monitoring should connect academic practices (‘science’) and local community and Indigenous practices, encompassing ‘TEK, LEK and IK.’ This paper recommends research approaches and methods for connecting scientists, local communities and IK holders and their respective knowledge systems, and priorities, to help improve marine ecosystem management. Case studies from Canada and New Zealand (NZ) highlight the emerging recognition of IK systems in natural resource management, policy and economic development. The in-depth case studies from Ocean Networks Canada (ONC) and the new Moana Project, NZ highlight real-world experiences connecting IK with scientific monitoring programs. Trial-tested recommendations for successful collaboration include practices for two-way knowledge sharing between scientists and communities, co-development of funding proposals, project plans and educational resources, mutually agreed installation of monitoring equipment, and ongoing sharing of data and research results. We recommend that future ocean monitoring research be conducted using cross-cultural and/or transdisciplinary approaches. Vast oceans and relatively limited monitoring data coupled with the urgency of a changing climate emphasize the need for all eyes possible providing new data and insights. Community members and ocean monitoring scientists in joint research teams are essential for increasing ocean information using diverse methods compared with previous scientific research. Research partnerships can also ensure impactful outcomes through improved understanding of community needs and priorities.

[1]  P. Stabeno,et al.  The Arctic Marine Pulses Model: linking annual oceanographic processes to contiguous ecological domains in the Pacific Arctic , 2016, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography.

[2]  J. Bruce.  Impact of climate change , 1995, Nature.

[3]  Glenn Nolan,et al.  Challenges for global ocean observation: the need for increased human capacity , 2018, Journal of Operational Oceanography.

[4]  A. Tidd,et al.  The impact of industrial tuna fishing on small-scale fishers and economies in the Pacific , 2018, Marine Policy.

[5]  Á. Borja,et al.  Yes, We Can! Large-Scale Integrative Assessment of European Regional Seas, Using Open Access Databases , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[6]  Roberto Danovaro,et al.  Exponential Decline of Deep-Sea Ecosystem Functioning Linked to Benthic Biodiversity Loss , 2008, Current Biology.

[7]  J. Wilen,et al.  The Economics of Territorial Use Rights Fisheries, or TURFs , 2012, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[8]  J. Wilen,et al.  TURFs and ITQs: Collective vs. Individual Decision Making , 2007, Marine Resource Economics.

[9]  Ilmo Mäenpää,et al.  Aug 13, 2021 The importance of hunting and small-scale , 2017 .

[10]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[11]  D. Hikuroa.  Mātauranga Māori—the ūkaipō of knowledge in New Zealand , 2017 .

[12]  Henry P. Huntington,et al.  Observations on the Utility of the Semi-directive Interview for Documenting Traditional Ecological Knowledge , 1998 .

[13]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Co-management Policy Can Reduce Resilience in Traditionally Managed Marine Ecosystems , 2006, Ecosystems.

[14]  R. Danovaro,et al.  Seafloor heterogeneity influences the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships in the deep sea , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Snejana Moncheva,et al.  European Marine Biodiversity Monitoring Networks: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[16]  Ralf Bachmayer,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Developing the Next Generation of Marine OBservatories (MOBs) for Science and Society , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[17]  Nicolás L. Gutiérrez,et al.  Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries , 2011, Nature.

[18]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  Towards a greater understanding of pattern, scale and process in marine benthic systems: a picture is worth a thousand worms , 2003 .

[19]  Nathalie Pettorelli,et al.  Satellite remote sensing, biodiversity research and conservation of the future , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  C. Ryer,et al.  Evaluating the role of fish behavior in surveys conducted with underwater vehicles , 2008 .

[21]  Paul H. Whitfield,et al.  Designing monitoring programs for water quality based on experience in Canada II. Characterization of problems and data-quality objectives , 2010 .

[22]  Á. Borja,et al.  Quantified biotic and abiotic responses to multiple stress in freshwater, marine and ground waters. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  M. Fernández-Giménez,et al.  Observations on the Workshop as a Means of Improving Communication Between Holders of Traditional and Scientific Knowledge , 2002, Environmental management.

[24]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[25]  D. Kim,et al.  TURFs and clubs: empirical evidence of the effect of self-governance on profitability in South Korea's inshore (maul) fisheries , 2011, Environment and Development Economics.

[26]  R. Brook,et al.  Fostering Community-Based Wildlife Health Monitoring and Research in the Canadian North , 2009, EcoHealth.

[27]  G. Kofinas,et al.  Towards a protocol for community monitoring of caribou body condition , 2003 .

[28]  Jay Pearlman,et al.  Advancing Marine Biological Observations and Data Requirements of the Complementary Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) Frameworks , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[29]  Brooks A. Kaiser,et al.  Transitional Forces in a Resource Based Economy: Phases of Economic and Institutional Development in Hawaii , 2014 .

[30]  D. Tran,et al.  High Frequency Non-invasive (HFNI) Bio-Sensors As a Potential Tool for Marine Monitoring and Assessments , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[31]  Toward a Strategy for Undertaking Cross-Cultural Collaborative Research , 2001 .

[32]  M. Patterson,et al.  Cross-cultural environmental research processes, principles, and methods: coastal examples from Aotearoa/New Zealand , 2015 .

[33]  E. Barbier,et al.  Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services , 2006, Science.

[34]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement , 2012 .

[35]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[36]  F. Berkes,et al.  Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management , 2004 .

[37]  F. Berkes.  Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change , 2009 .

[38]  Lauren V. Weatherdon,et al.  Zooplankton monitoring to contribute towards addressing global biodiversity conservation challenges , 2018, Journal of plankton research.

[39]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[40]  Jaume Piera,et al.  Citizen Bio-Optical Observations from Coast- and Ocean and Their Compatibility with Ocean Colour Satellite Measurements , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Elena M. Finkbeiner,et al.  Spatial management in small-scale fisheries: A potential approach for climate change adaptation in Pacific Islands , 2017 .

[42]  B. Hersoug.  “After all these years” – New Zealand's quota management system at the crossroads , 2018, Marine Policy.

[43]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Integrating marine protected areas with catch regulation , 2006 .

[44]  Carl J. Walters,et al.  Large‐Scale Management Experiments and Learning by Doing , 1990 .

[45]  Anthony C. Janetos,et al.  Research priorities in land use and land‐cover change for the Earth system and integrated assessment modelling , 2010 .

[46]  Nathalie Niquil,et al.  Using ecological models to assess ecosystem status in support of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2015 .

[47]  R. Arnason.  Property Rights in Fisheries: How Much Can Individual Transferable Quotas Accomplish? , 2012, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[48]  J. Lessard,et al.  APPLYING LOCAL AND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SUSTAINABLE FISHERY : THE WEST COAST VANCOUVER ISLAND GOOSE BARNACLE FISHERY EXPERIENCE , 2003 .

[49]  Quentin Hanich,et al.  A collective approach to Pacific islands fisheries management: Moving beyond regional agreements , 2010 .

[50]  P. Lyver.  Use of traditional knowledge by Rakiura Maori to guide sooty shearwater harvests , 2002 .

[51]  S. Glomsrød,et al.  Economy of the North , 2006 .

[52]  D. Schneider,et al.  Mapping Cod: Fisheries Science, Fish Harvesters’ Ecological Knowledge and Cod Migrations in the Northern Gulf of St. Lawrence , 2008 .

[53]  H. Moller,et al.  Use of Matauranga (Maori Traditional Knowledge) and science to guide a seabird harvest : Getting the best of both worlds? , 2005 .

[54]  C. Paci.  THE EARTH IS FASTER NOW: INDIGENOUS OBSERVATIONS OF ARCTIC ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE. Igor Krupnik and Dyanna Jolly (Editors). 2002. Fairbanks: Arctic Research Consortium of the United States. xxvii + 356 p; illustrated; soft cover. ISBN 0-9720449-0-6. US$20.00. , 2004, Polar Record.

[55]  M. Gibbs.  Toward a Strategy for Undertaking Cross-Cultural Collaborative Research , 2001 .

[56]  C. Folke,et al.  REDISCOVERY OF TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE AS ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[57]  Nancy Knowlton,et al.  Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. , 2012, Annual review of marine science.

[58]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[59]  Á. Parrado-Rosselli.  A Collaborative Research Process Studying Fruit Availability and Seed Dispersal within an Indigenous Community in the Middle Caqueta River Region, Colombian Amazon , 2007 .

[60]  H. Gordon.  The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery , 1954, Journal of Political Economy.

[61]  Daniel C. Dunn,et al.  Empowering high seas governance with satellite vessel tracking data , 2018 .

[62]  J. Kitson.  Harvest rate of sooty shearwaters (Puffinus griseus) by Rakiura Māori: a potential tool to monitor population trends? , 2004 .

[63]  L. Anderson,et al.  Applicability of Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs) in Japanese fisheries: A comparison of rights-based fisheries management in Iceland, Japan, and United States , 2012 .

[64]  S. Chaturvedi.  The circumpolar “Social Natural Sciences” laboratories: knowledges, values and practices* , 2016 .

[65]  James G. Carrier,et al.  Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia. , 1982 .

[66]  Jeff L. Foote,et al.  Enabling mātauranga-informed management of the Kaipara Harbour, Aotearoa New Zealand , 2018, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research.

[67]  Benjamin S Halpern,et al.  Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[68]  J. Bruno,et al.  The Impact of Climate Change on the World’s Marine Ecosystems , 2010, Science.

[69]  P. Lyver,et al.  Traditional Ecological Knowledge and scientific inference of prey availability: Harvests of sooty shearwater (Puffinus griseus) chicks by Rakiura Maori , 2009 .

[70]  Kevin Winter,et al.  Remote sensing of cyanobacteria-dominant algal blooms and water quality parameters in Zeekoevlei, a small hypertrophic lake, using MERIS , 2010 .

[71]  Linda Smith,et al.  Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples , 2000 .

[72]  D. Blondeau-Patissier,et al.  Comparison of bio-physical marine products from SeaWiFS, MODIS and a bio-optical model with in situ measurements from Northern European waters , 2004 .

[73]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Status and Solutions for the World’s Unassessed Fisheries , 2012, Science.

[74]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  Fisheries Contributions to the Gross Domestic Product: Underestimating Small-scale Fisheries in the Pacific , 2006, Marine Resource Economics.

[75]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  A Global System for Monitoring Ecosystem Service Change , 2012 .

[76]  S. Wood,et al.  Factors influencing biodeposit production by the New Zealand freshwater mussel Echyridella menziesii , 2018 .

[77]  Ward Appeltans,et al.  Essential ocean variables for global sustained observations of biodiversity and ecosystem changes , 2018, Global change biology.

[78]  R. Deacon.  Fishery Management by Harvester Cooperatives , 2012, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[79]  H. Moller,et al.  Changes in sooty shearwater Puffinus griseus chick production and harvest precede ENSO events , 1999 .

[80]  Nathalie Niquil,et al.  Uses of Innovative Modeling Tools within the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[81]  Roberto Danovaro,et al.  Implementing and Innovating Marine Monitoring Approaches for Assessing Marine Environmental Status , 2016, Front. Mar. Sci..

[82]  Matthew T. Heberling,et al.  Benefit Transfer Challenges: Perspectives from U.S. Practitioners , 2018, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[83]  G. Harmsworth,et al.  Indigenous MāOri knowledge and perspectives of ecosystems. , 2013 .

[84]  Ward Appeltans,et al.  Linking Capacity Development to GOOS Monitoring Networks to Achieve Sustained Ocean Observation , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[85]  A. Jeffs,et al.  Mātauranga Māori driving innovation in the New Zealand scampi fishery , 2018, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research.

[86]  G Jones,et al.  A new wave of marine evidence-based management: emerging challenges and solutions to transform monitoring, evaluating, and reporting , 2018 .

[87]  Franklin B. Schwing,et al.  The Pace of Shifting Climate in Marine and Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2011, Science.

[88]  R. Reeves,et al.  Tracking arctic marine mammal resilience in an era of rapid ecosystem alteration , 2018, PLoS biology.

[89]  S. Aswani,et al.  Multiple Drivers of Local (Non-) Compliance in Community-Based Marine Resource Management: Case Studies from the South Pacific , 2017, Front. Mar. Sci..

[90]  Patrick Gorringe,et al.  Australian Ocean Data Network (AODN) "Publicly Funded Data, Publicly Available" , 2010, 2010 IEEE Sixth International Conference on e-Science.

[91]  N. Sims,et al.  Nutritional Attributes, Substitutability, Scalability, and Environmental Intensity of an Illustrative Subset of Current and Future Protein Sources for Aquaculture Feeds: Joint Consideration of Potential Synergies and Trade-offs. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[92]  Kim Hill,et al.  Emergence of Indigenous Vegetation Classifications Through Integration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Remote Sensing Analyses , 2006, Environmental management.

[93]  D. Martinez,et al.  Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Ecosystem Science, and Environmental Management , 2000 .