High‐resolution image of Calaveras Fault seismicity

[1] By measuring relative earthquake arrival times using waveform cross correlation and locating earthquakes using the double difference technique, we are able to reduce hypocentral errors by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude over routine locations for nearly 8000 events along a 35-km section of the Calaveras Fault. This represents ∼92% of all seismicity since 1984 and includes the rupture zone of the M 6.2 1984 Morgan Hill, California, earthquake. The relocated seismicity forms highly organized structures that were previously obscured by location errors. There are abundant repeating earthquake sequences as well as linear clusters of earthquakes. Large voids in seismicity appear with dimensions of kilometers that have been aseismic over the 30-year time interval, suggesting that these portions of the fault are either locked or creeping. The area of greatest slip in the Morgan Hill main shock coincides with the most prominent of these voids, suggesting that this part of the fault may be locked between large earthquakes. We find that the Calaveras Fault at depth is extremely thin, with an average upper bound on fault zone width of 75 m. Given the location error, however, this width is not resolvably different from zero. The relocations reveal active secondary faults, which we use to solve for the stress field in the immediate vicinity of the Calaveras Fault. We find that the maximum compressive stress is at a high angle, only 13° from the fault normal, supporting previous interpretations that this fault is weak.

[1]  Fred W. Klein,et al.  Deep fault plane geometry inferred from multiplet relative relocation beneath the south flank of Kilauea , 1994 .

[2]  W. Ellsworth.  Characteristic earthquakes and long-term earthquake forecasts: Implications of central california seismicity , 1995 .

[3]  M. Zoback,et al.  New Evidence on the State of Stress of the San Andreas Fault System , 1987, Science.

[4]  Allan M. Rubin,et al.  Highly concentrated seismicity caused by deformation of Kilauea's deep magma system , 1996, Nature.

[5]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[6]  A. Rubin,et al.  Streaks of microearthquakes along creeping faults , 1999, Nature.

[7]  B. E. Shaw,et al.  Postseismic response of repeating aftershocks , 1998 .

[8]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  Slip‐parallel seismic lineations on the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 1999 .

[9]  K. Aki,et al.  A delineation of the Nojima fault ruptured in the M7.2 Kobe, Japan, earthquake of 1995 using fault zone trapped waves , 1998 .

[10]  A. Michael.  Effects of three-dimensional velocity structure on the seismicity of the 1984 Morgan Hill, California, aftershock sequence , 1988 .

[11]  T. McEvilly,et al.  Fault slip rates at depth from recurrence intervals of repeating microearthquakes , 1999, Science.

[12]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Fault plane solutions for the 1984 Morgan Hill, California, Earthquake Sequence: Evidence for the state of stress on the Calaveras Fault , 1988 .

[13]  T B Comstock,et al.  U. S. Geological Survey , 1907, Radiocarbon.

[14]  L. Geiger.  Herdbestimmung bei Erdbeben aus den Ankunftszeiten , 1910 .

[15]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  RUPTURE HISTORY OF THE 1984 MORGAN HILL, CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE FROM THE INVERSION OF STRONG MOTION RECORDS , 1986 .

[16]  Felix Waldhauser,et al.  hypoDD -- A Program to Compute Double-Difference Hypocenter Locations , 2001 .

[17]  William L. Ellsworth,et al.  Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublets: An application to the Calaveras Fault, California , 1984 .

[18]  K. Aki,et al.  San Jacinto Fault Zone guided waves: A discrimination for recently active fault strands near Anza, California , 1997 .

[19]  J. Angelier,et al.  Determination of the mean principal directions of stresses for a given fault population , 1979 .

[20]  R. Sibson.  Roughness at the base of the seismogenic zone: Contributing factors , 1984 .

[21]  Nicholas Deichmann,et al.  Rupture geometry from high-precision relative hypocentre locations of microearthquake clusters , 1992 .

[22]  K. Aki,et al.  Seismic Trapped Modes in the Oroville and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1990, Science.

[23]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Linearized inversion for fault rupture behavior: Application to the 1984 Morgan Hill, California, earthquake , 1988 .

[24]  Stephen H. Hartzell,et al.  Aftershock patterns and main shock faulting , 1988 .

[25]  Allan M. Rubin,et al.  Aftershocks of microearthquakes as probes of the mechanics of rupture , 2002 .

[26]  W. Bakun,et al.  Slip partitioning of the Calaveras Fault, California, and prospects for future earthquakes , 1990 .

[27]  The 1984 Morgan Hill, California, Earthquake , 1984, Science.

[28]  Felix Waldhauser,et al.  Fault structure and mechanics of the Hayward Fault, California, from double-difference earthquake locations , 2002 .

[29]  E. Hauksson,et al.  Role of fluids in faulting inferred from stress field signatures , 1999, Science.

[30]  William H. K. Lee,et al.  Fine Structure of the Landers Fault Zone: Segmentation and the Rupture Process , 1994, Science.

[31]  Map showing recently active breaks along the Hayward fault zone and the southern part of the Calaveras fault zone, California , 1968 .

[32]  J. Rice,et al.  Repeating Earthquakes as Low-Stress-Drop Events at a Border between Locked and Creeping Fault Patches , 2001 .

[33]  Julien Frechet,et al.  Sismogenese et doublets sismiques , 1985 .

[34]  Robert M. Nadeau,et al.  Seismological studies at Parkfield VI: Moment release rates and estimates of source parameters for small repeating earthquakes , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[35]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  A Double-Difference Earthquake Location Algorithm: Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 2000 .

[36]  Stephen H. Hickman,et al.  A Simple Stick-Slip and Creep-Slip Model for Repeating Earthquakes and its Implication for Microearthquakes at Parkfield , 2001 .

[37]  M. Zoback,et al.  Implications of earthquake focal mechanisms for the frictional strength of the San Andreas fault system , 2001, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[38]  G. Beroza,et al.  Deep structure of a fault discontinuity , 1999 .