A Systematic Literature Review of Applications of the Physics of Notations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Cummings. Argument from Authority , 2015 .
[2] Jane Cleland-Huang,et al. A visual language for modeling and executing traceability queries , 2012, Software & Systems Modeling.
[3] Giancarlo Guizzardi,et al. PoN-S: A Systematic Approach for Applying the Physics of Notation (PoN) , 2016, BMMDS/EMMSAD.
[4] Flávia Maria Santoro,et al. A notation for Knowledge-Intensive Processes , 2013, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).
[5] Xavier Le Pallec,et al. Enhancing the communication value of UML models with graphical layers , 2015, 2015 ACM/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS).
[6] Sajid Anwer,et al. An Evaluation of the Statechart Diagrams Visual Syntax , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Information Science & Applications (ICISA).
[7] Thierry Nodenot,et al. A visual programming language for designing interactions embedded in web-based geographic applications , 2012, IUI '12.
[8] John Krogstie,et al. Implementation and First Evaluation of a Molecular Modeling Language , 2015, BMMDS/EMMSAD.
[9] Gustavo Rossi,et al. WebSpec: a visual language for specifying interaction and navigation requirements in web applications , 2011, Requirements Engineering.
[10] Esperanza Marcos,et al. Enabling the Development of Cognitive Effective Visual DSLs , 2014, MoDELS.
[11] Michael Derntl,et al. The Impact of Perceived Cognitive Effectiveness on Perceived Usefulness of Visual Conceptual Modeling Languages , 2011, ER.
[12] Manfred Reichert,et al. A visual language for modeling multiple perspectives of business process compliance rules , 2017, Software & Systems Modeling.
[13] Daniel Amyot,et al. Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the UCM visual notation , 2010, SAM'10.
[14] Axel van Lamsweerde,et al. Requirements Engineering: From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications , 2009 .
[15] Jan Mendling,et al. The Effect Of Process Map Design Quality On Process Management Success , 2013, ECIS.
[16] Jian Liu,et al. A domain-specific visual modeling language for testing environment emulation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC).
[17] Heinrich C. Mayr,et al. Conceptual Modeling for Ambient Assistance , 2013, ER.
[18] Claes Wohlin,et al. Using Students as Subjects—A Comparative Study of Students and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment , 2000, Empirical Software Engineering.
[19] Pearl Brereton,et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A tertiary study , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[20] Abdulaziz S. Algablan,et al. A visual syntax for Larman's operation contracts , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS).
[21] Kurt Sandkuhl,et al. Selecting the "Right" Notation for Business Process Modeling: Experiences from an Industrial Case , 2015, BIR.
[22] Pascal Hirmer,et al. A situation-aware workflow modelling extension , 2015, iiWAS.
[23] Paolo Giorgini,et al. Designing secure business processes with SecBPMN , 2015, Software & Systems Modeling.
[24] Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al. Using the “Physics” of notations to analyze a visual representation of business decision modeling , 2012, 2012 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC).
[25] Werner Esswein,et al. Systemizing Colour for Conceptual Modeling , 2017, Wirtschaftsinformatik.
[26] Guttorm Sindre,et al. Diagram Notations for Mobile Work Processes , 2011, PoEM.
[27] Jan Mendling,et al. Enhancing understandability of process models through cultural-dependent color adjustments , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..
[28] Tom Mens,et al. GISMO: a domain-specific modelling language for executable prototyping of gestural interaction , 2015, EICS.
[29] Reinhard Schütte,et al. The Guidelines of Modeling - An Approach to Enhance the Quality in Information Models , 1998, ER.
[30] João Araújo,et al. Towards Security Modeling of e-Voting Systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW).
[31] Patrick Heymans,et al. Visual syntax does matter: improving the cognitive effectiveness of the i* visual notation , 2010, Requirements Engineering.
[32] Ketil Stølen,et al. Design Decisions in the Development of a Graphical Language for Risk-Driven Security Testing , 2016, RISK.
[33] Andrew Fish,et al. How to visualise a conversation: case-based reasoning approach , 2014 .
[34] Mario A. Bochicchio,et al. SARA: A tool for service levels — Aware contracts , 2013, 2013 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2013).
[35] Jan Mendling,et al. An Explorative Analysis of the Notational Characteristics of the Decision Model and Notation (DMN) , 2016, 2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW).
[36] Matthew E Falagas,et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[37] Alain Wegmann,et al. Using the Physics of Notations Theory to Evaluate the Visual Notation of SEAM , 2014, 2014 IEEE 16th Conference on Business Informatics.
[38] Herbert A. Simon,et al. Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..
[39] Zdena Dobesova,et al. USING THE PHYSICS OF NOTATION TO ANALYSE MODELBUILDER DIAGRAMS , 2013 .
[40] Ileana Ober,et al. HPCML: a modeling language dedicated to high-performance scientific computing , 2012, MDHPCL '12.
[41] John G. Hosking,et al. Ruru: A spatial and interactive visual programming language for novice robot programming , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC).
[42] Michael Derntl,et al. Cognitive effectiveness of visual instructional design languages , 2010, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..
[43] Robertas Damasevicius,et al. Design of Visual Language Syntax for Robot Programming Domain , 2013, ICIST.
[44] Enrique Martínez,et al. A Model for Visual Specification of E-contracts , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.
[45] Rabih Bashroush,et al. Modelling large-scale information systems using ADLs - An industrial experience report , 2015, J. Syst. Softw..
[46] Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al. Semiotic Considerations for the Design of an Agent-Oriented Modelling Language , 2012, BMMDS/EMMSAD.
[47] Klaus-Dieter Schewe,et al. Deontic BPMN: a powerful extension of BPMN with a trusted model transformation , 2013, Software & Systems Modeling.
[48] Haralambos Mouratidis,et al. Syntactic and Semantic Extensions to Secure Tropos to Support Security Risk Management , 2012, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..
[49] María Gómez,et al. User Interface Transition Diagrams for customer-developer communication improvement in software development projects , 2013, J. Syst. Softw..
[50] Mohamed El-Attar,et al. A scientific evaluation of the misuse case diagrams visual syntax , 2015, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[51] Adam Steele,et al. A Taxonomy and Visual Notation for Modeling Globally Distributed Requirements Engineering Projects , 2010, 2010 5th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering.
[52] Angela Carrillo Ramos,et al. Towards a Domain-Specific Language to Design Adaptive Software: the DMLAS Approach , 2016 .
[53] John Mylopoulos,et al. Exploring alternative designs for sociotechnical systems , 2014, 2014 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).
[54] G. Barkdoll,et al. "Evaluating the Evaluators" , 1978, Evaluation & the health professions.
[55] Jan Van den Bergh,et al. CAP3: context-sensitive abstract user interface specification , 2011, EICS '11.
[56] Mario E. Sánchez,et al. Visual Analysis of Enterprise Models , 2012, 2012 IEEE 16th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops.
[57] Dirk van der Linden,et al. User Involvement in Applications of the PoN , 2016, CAiSE Workshops.
[58] John Grundy,et al. SecDSVL: A Domain-Specific Visual Language to Support Enterprise Security Modelling , 2014, 2014 23rd Australian Software Engineering Conference.
[59] Geert Poels,et al. The Development and Experimental Evaluation of a Focused Business Model Representation , 2015, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..
[60] Dirk van der Linden,et al. A Framework for Improving the Verifiability of Visual Notation Design Grounded in the Physics of Notations , 2017, 2017 IEEE 25th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE).
[61] Jos van Hillegersberg,et al. Evaluating the Visual Syntax of UML: An Analysis of the Cognitive Effectiveness of the UMLFamily of Diagrams , 2009, SLE.
[62] Pearl Brereton,et al. Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering , 2006, ICSE.
[63] Claes Wohlin,et al. Using students as subjects - an empirical evaluation , 2008, ESEM '08.
[64] Geert Poels,et al. Realizing strategic fit within the business architecture: the design of a Process-Goal Alignment modeling and analysis technique , 2019, Software & Systems Modeling.
[65] Brian Berenbach,et al. Towards a unified Requirements Modeling Language , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization.
[66] Tom DeMarco,et al. Structured Analysis and System Specification , 1978 .
[67] John Grundy,et al. A suite of visual languages for model-driven development of statistical surveys and services , 2015, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing.
[68] N. Hari Narayanan,et al. Visual language theory: towards a human computer interaction perspective , 1998 .
[69] Nadine Mandran,et al. Evaluating the appropriateness of the BPMN 2.0 standard for modeling service choreographies: using an extended quality framework , 2014, Software & Systems Modeling.
[70] Jan Mendling,et al. A Novel Framework for Visualizing Declarative Process Models , 2016, ZEUS.
[71] Ron Weber,et al. Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..
[72] G. A. Miller. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .
[73] Stefan Strohmeier,et al. Conceptual Modeling in Human Resource Management: A Design Research Approach , 2017, AIS Trans. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[74] Ulrich Frank,et al. A Domain-specific Modelling Language for Clinical Pathways in the Realm of Multi-perspective Hospital Modelling , 2015, ECIS.
[75] Dirk van der Linden,et al. How Cognitively Effective is a Visual Notation? On the Inherent Difficulty of Operationalizing the Physics of Notations , 2016, BMMDS/EMMSAD.
[76] Kurt Sandkuhl,et al. Component-Based Method Development: An Experience Report , 2014, PoEM.
[77] Birgit Vogel-Heuser,et al. Evaluation of a graphical modeling language for the specification of manufacturing execution systems , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA 2012).
[78] Pearl Brereton,et al. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain , 2007, J. Syst. Softw..
[79] Monika Malinova. A Language for Process Map Design , 2014, Business Process Management Workshops.
[80] Flávia Maria Santoro,et al. Towards a context-based representation of the dynamicity perspective in knowledge-intensive processes , 2015, 2015 IEEE 19th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).
[81] Tom De Marco,et al. Structured Analysis And System Specification , 2015 .
[82] John Krogstie,et al. Visually Capturing Usage Context in BPMN by Small Adaptations of Diagram Notation , 2013, BMMDS/EMMSAD.
[83] Jan Mendling,et al. Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG) , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[84] Mohamed El-Attar,et al. Empirical validating the cognitive effectiveness of a new feature diagrams visual syntax , 2016, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[85] Pearl Brereton,et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[86] Uwe Aßmann,et al. FRaMED: full-fledge role modeling editor (tool demo) , 2016, SLE.
[87] Daniel Amyot,et al. Analysing the Cognitive Effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 Visual Notation , 2010, SLE.
[88] Jivka Ovtcharova,et al. A Visual Language for the Collaborative Visualization of Integrated Conceptual Models in Product Development Scenarios , 2013 .
[89] Wouter Joosen,et al. MASC: Modelling Architectural Security Concerns , 2015, 2015 IEEE/ACM 7th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering.
[90] Hajo A. Reijers,et al. Toward Advanced Visualization Techniques for Conceptual Modeling , 2015, CAiSE Forum.
[91] Marco Brambilla,et al. Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the WebML visual notation , 2017, Software & Systems Modeling.
[92] John Krogstie,et al. Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[93] Xin Huang,et al. A Map of Threats to Validity of Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering , 2016, 2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC).
[94] Ken Peffers,et al. Towards a More Cognitively Effective Business Process Notation for Requirements Engineering , 2014, DESRIST.
[95] Andreas L. Opdahl,et al. Extending the UML Statecharts Notation to Model Security Aspects , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[96] Xavier Le Pallec,et al. A Model-based Approach for Engineering Multimodal Mobile Interactions , 2014, MoMM.
[97] Paul A. Fishwick,et al. Prototyping an analog computing representation of predator prey dynamics , 2014, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014.
[98] Zdena Dobesova. VISUAL LANGUAGE FOR GEODATABASE DESIGN , 2013 .
[99] Nikolay Mehandjiev,et al. Design of a Suite of Visual Languages for Supply Chain Specification , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing.
[100] Lindsay Vickery. Notational semantics in music visualisation and notation , 2014 .
[101] Daniel L. Moody,et al. The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
[102] Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al. Towards the Consolidation of a Diagramming Suite for Agent-Oriented Modelling Languages , 2013 .
[103] Oliver Kopp,et al. Vino4TOSCA: A Visual Notation for Application Topologies Based on TOSCA , 2012, OTM Conferences.
[104] João Araújo,et al. SnapMind: A framework to support consistency and validation of model-based requirements in agile development , 2014, 2014 IEEE 4th International Model-Driven Requirements Engineering Workshop (MoDRE).
[105] Geert Poels,et al. Evaluating and Improving the Visualisation of CHOOSE, an Enterprise Architecture Approach for SMEs , 2014, PoEM.
[106] Michalis Famelis,et al. MAV-Vis: A notation for model uncertainty , 2013, 2013 5th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering (MiSE).
[107] Andrew Fish,et al. Towards an Operationalization of the "Physics of Notations" for the Analysis of Visual Languages , 2013, MoDELS.
[108] Steve Hitchman,et al. The Details of Conceptual Modelling Notations are Important - A Comparison of Relationship Normative Language , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[109] Mario A. Bochicchio,et al. Modeling Service Contracts Composition, Management and Visualization with tree graphs: Ma.Vi.C. , 2014, MEDES.
[110] Aaron J. Quigley,et al. Jeeves - A visual programming environment for mobile experience sampling , 2015, 2015 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC).
[111] John Mylopoulos,et al. Multi-objective risk analysis with goal models , 2016, 2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS).