Decoding of temporal visual information from electrically evoked retinal ganglion cell activities in photoreceptor-degenerated retinas.

PURPOSE To restore visual function via the prosthetic stimulation of retina, visual information must be properly represented in the electrically evoked neural activity of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). In this study, the RGC responses in photoreceptor-degenerated retinas were shown to actually encode temporal information on visual input when they were stimulated by biphasic pulse trains with amplitude modulation. METHODS Multiple RGC spike trains were recorded from rd1 mouse retinal patches mounted on planar microelectrode arrays while being stimulated by pulse trains with amplitudes modulated by the intensity variation of a natural scene. To reconstruct the time series of pulse train amplitudes from the evoked RGC activity, spike train decoding was performed. The accuracy of decoding-that is, the similarity between the original and decoded pulse amplitudes-was observed, to evaluate the appropriateness of the stimulation. RESULTS The response strengths of the RGCs could be successfully modulated when the pulse amplitude was varied between 2 and 20 μA. When the amplitude modulation range and pulse rates were determined elaborately, the temporal profile of the intensity could be successfully decoded from RGC spike trains, although abnormal oscillatory background rhythms (~10 Hz) were consistently present in the rd1 spike activity. CONCLUSIONS The results extend previous findings on the possibility of visual information encoding by electrical stimulation of normal retinas to stimulate degenerated retinas, in which neural activity is significantly altered. This supports the feasibility of encoding of temporal information by retinal prostheses.

[1]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[2]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Subset based least squares subspace regression in RKHS , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[3]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina , 2000, Vision Research.

[4]  R C Reid,et al.  Efficient Coding of Natural Scenes in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Experimental Test of a Computational Theory , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Kelly,et al.  Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Thomas Euler,et al.  Functional Stability of Retinal Ganglion Cells after Degeneration-Induced Changes in Synaptic Input , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  C. Kim,et al.  Temporal response properties of retinal ganglion cells in rd1 mice evoked by amplitude-modulated electrical pulse trains. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Matthew Fellows,et al.  Robustness of neuroprosthetic decoding algorithms , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  S. Hyakin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1994 .

[11]  Mark S Humayun,et al.  Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  William Bialek,et al.  Reading a Neural Code , 1991, NIPS.

[13]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[14]  S. Stasheff,et al.  Emergence of sustained spontaneous hyperactivity and temporary preservation of OFF responses in ganglion cells of the retinal degeneration (rd1) mouse. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  C. Kim,et al.  Electrically-evoked Neural Activities of rd1 Mice Retinal Ganglion Cells by Repetitive Pulse Stimulation. , 2009, The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology.

[16]  F. Werblin,et al.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Pamela Reinagel,et al.  Decoding visual information from a population of retinal ganglion cells. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  L. Merabet,et al.  What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  C A Curcio,et al.  Preservation of ganglion cell layer neurons in age-related macular degeneration. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  R. Jensen,et al.  Responses of ganglion cells to repetitive electrical stimulation of the retina , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[21]  S. Ryu,et al.  Characterization of retinal ganglion cell activities evoked by temporally patterned electrical stimulation for the development of stimulus encoding strategies for retinal implants , 2009, Brain Research.

[22]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  C. Kim,et al.  Decoding of retinal ganglion cell spike trains evoked by temporally patterned electrical stimulation , 2010, Brain Research.

[25]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[27]  E. Zrenner Will Retinal Implants Restore Vision ? , 2002 .