Object Shape, Object Name, and Object Kind: Representation and Development

[1]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[2]  K. Nelson.  Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. , 1974 .

[3]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Clarifying the role of shape in children's taxonomic assumption. , 1992, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Terry Kit-fong Au,et al.  Acquiring word meanings via linguistic contrast , 1987 .

[7]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  What looks like a jiggy but acts like a zimbo?: A study of early word meaning using artificial objects , 1978 .

[8]  R. Gelman,et al.  Preschooler's Ability to Decide Whether a Photographed Unfamiliar Object Can Move Itself. , 1988 .

[9]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The place of perception in children's concepts ☆ , 1993 .

[10]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Children's Theories of Word Meaning: The Role of Shape Similarity in Early Acquisition , 1994 .

[11]  The acquisition of homonymy , 1980, Cognition.

[12]  E. Markman,et al.  Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. , 1987, Child development.

[13]  Ann L. Brown.  Domain-Specific Principles Affect Learning and Transfer in Children , 1990 .

[14]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Judy S. DeLoache,et al.  Picture perception in infancy , 1979 .

[16]  S. Carey.  Does learning a language require the child to reconceptualize the world , 1994 .

[17]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Count nouns, adjectives, and perceptual properties in children's novel word interpretations. , 1992 .

[18]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[19]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Objects and places: Geometric and syntactic representations in early lexical learning , 1990 .

[20]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Perception, ontology, and naming in young children: Commentary on Soja, Carey, and Spelke , 1992, Cognition.

[21]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: a study of one child's performance. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  D. H. Dodd,et al.  Early word meanings: perceptually or functionally based? , 1980, Child development.

[23]  Elizabeth F. Shipley,et al.  Mothers' use of superordinate category terms , 1983, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  R. Jackendoff.  MME. Tussaud meets the binding theory , 1992 .

[25]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Perceptual Similarity and Conceptual Structure , 1992 .

[26]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Syntactic context and the shape bias in children's and adults' lexical learning , 1992 .

[27]  R. Nosofsky.  American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[28]  Ellen M. Markman,et al.  Constraints on word meaning in early language acquisition , 1994 .

[29]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object properties and knowledge in early lexical learning. , 1991, Child development.

[30]  H. Putnam.  IS SEMANTICS POSSIBLE , 1970 .

[31]  N. Soja.  Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax , 1992 .

[32]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[33]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Inductions from novel categories: The role of language and conceptual structure , 1990 .

[34]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[35]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language and the career of similarity. , 1991 .

[36]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[37]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[38]  E. Spelke,et al.  Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.

[39]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  R. Shepard.  Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[41]  S. Gelman.  The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  E. Spelke,et al.  Perception, ontology, and word meaning , 1992, Cognition.

[43]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  The development of an appreciation of specific linkages between linguistic and conceptual organization , 1994 .

[44]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[45]  F. Keil.  Explanation, association, and the acquisition of word meaning , 1994 .

[46]  W. Merriman,et al.  An appearance-function shift in children's object naming , 1993, Journal of Child Language.

[47]  Elizabeth F. Shipley,et al.  Categories, hierarchies, and induction , 1993 .