Exploiting advantages of empirical and optimization approaches to design alkali activated materials in a more efficient way

[1]  J. Fořt,et al.  Application of waste brick powder in alkali activated aluminosilicates: Functional and environmental aspects , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[2]  Mingjiang Tao,et al.  Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer , 2013 .

[3]  Juan Nong Chen,et al.  Fly Ash the Status of Resource-Oriented Utilization in Construction Material , 2013 .

[4]  Robert Ries,et al.  Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[5]  Christopher R. Shearer,et al.  A review on alkali-activated binders: Materials composition and fresh properties of concrete , 2020 .

[6]  Hao Wang,et al.  Fly ash-based geopolymer: clean production, properties and applications , 2016 .

[7]  Eva Vejmelková,et al.  Application of waste ceramic dust as a ready-to-use replacement of cement in lime-cement plasters: an environmental-friendly and energy-efficient solution , 2016, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[8]  Chi‐Hwa Wang,et al.  A decision support framework for the design and operation of sustainable urban farming systems , 2020 .

[9]  J. Deventer,et al.  The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals , 2000 .

[10]  J. Spangenberg,et al.  Hardening evolution of geopolymers from setting to equilibrium: A review , 2020, Cement and Concrete Composites.

[11]  Min Ook Kim,et al.  Acceleration of cement hydration from supplementary cementitious materials: Performance comparison between silica fume and hydrophobic silica , 2020 .

[12]  D. C. Nwonu,et al.  Development of expansive soil geopolymer binders for use in waste containment facility , 2020, Innovative Infrastructure Solutions.

[13]  J. Silvestre,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the production of composite sandwich panels for structural floor’s rehabilitation , 2020 .

[14]  B. Pacewska,et al.  Comparative investigation of reactivity of different kinds of fly ash in alkaline media , 2019, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[15]  Seungjun Roh,et al.  Analysis of the Primary Building Materials in Support of G-SEED Life Cycle Assessment in South Korea , 2018, Sustainability.

[16]  P. Rovnaník,et al.  Rheological properties and microstructure of binary waste red brick powder/metakaolin geopolymer , 2018, Construction and Building Materials.

[17]  W. Chan,et al.  The use of fly ashes from waste-to-energy processes as mineral CO2 sequesters and supplementary cementitious materials. , 2020, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Baoshan Huang,et al.  Mix design optimization and early strength prediction of unary and binary geopolymer from multiple waste streams. , 2020, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  C. Hwang,et al.  Performance evaluation of alkali activated mortar containing high volume of waste brick powder blended with ground granulated blast furnace slag cured at ambient temperature , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[20]  R. Černý,et al.  Red-clay ceramic powders as geopolymer precursors: Consideration of amorphous portion and CaO content , 2018, Applied Clay Science.

[21]  J. Labrincha,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the production of cement: A Brazilian case study , 2016 .

[22]  M. Ayoub,et al.  Optimization of synthesis of geopolymer adsorbent for the effective removal of anionic surfactant from aqueous solution , 2020 .

[23]  Chao Yan,et al.  Interfacial Reaction and Mechanical Properties of Sn-Bi Solder joints , 2017, Materials.

[24]  T. Miranda,et al.  Sustainable alkali activated materials: Precursor and activator derived from industrial wastes , 2017 .

[25]  Vladimir Erofeev,et al.  The Effectiveness of Materials Different with Regard to Increasing the Durability , 2016 .

[26]  M. Meincken,et al.  Investigating the suitability of fly ash/metakaolin-based geopolymers reinforced with South African alien invasive wood and sugarcane bagasse residues for use in outdoor conditions , 2021 .

[27]  T. Bier,et al.  Optimization of alkali-activated mortar utilizing ground granulated blast-furnace slag and natural pozzolan from Germany with the dynamic approach of the Taguchi method , 2017 .

[28]  J. Ideker,et al.  Advances in alternative cementitious binders , 2011 .

[29]  Hao Tang,et al.  Construction and Utilization of Post-Earthquake Waste Building Materials , 2013 .

[30]  Giorgio Pia,et al.  Water Absorption Properties of Cement Pastes: Experimental and Modelling Inspections , 2018 .

[31]  Duncan Herfort,et al.  Sustainable Development and Climate Change Initiatives , 2008 .

[32]  Robert Ries,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Service Life Prediction , 2014 .

[33]  Mijia Yang,et al.  Comparison of pore structure in alkali activated fly ash geopolymer and ordinary concrete due to alkali-silica reaction using micro-computed tomography , 2020 .

[34]  J. Sanz,et al.  On dehydroxylation mechanisms of a biotite in vacuo and in oxygen , 1983 .

[35]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future , 1999 .

[36]  Saeed Maghsoodloo,et al.  Strengths and limitations of taguchi's contributions to quality, manufacturing, and process engineering , 2004 .

[37]  G. Ye,et al.  Effect of the Sodium Silicate Modulus and Slag Content on Fresh and Hardened Properties of Alkali-Activated Fly Ash/Slag , 2019 .

[38]  M. Illikainen,et al.  Influence of sodium silicate powder silica modulus for mechanical and chemical properties of dry-mix alkali-activated slag mortar , 2020 .

[39]  C. Vidal,et al.  Guide to the expression of uncertainty , 2019, Springer Reference Medizin.

[40]  Asli Pelin Gurgun,et al.  Approaches for sustainable cement production – A case study from Turkey , 2013 .

[41]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  The characterisation of source materials in fly ash-based geopolymers , 2003 .

[42]  P. Basheer,et al.  Mechanical and durability properties of high performance concretes containing supplementary cementitious materials , 2010 .

[43]  P. Suraneni,et al.  Linking reactivity test outputs to properties of cementitious pastes made with supplementary cementitious materials , 2020 .

[44]  G. Kakali,et al.  Application of the Taguchi approach for the composition optimization of alkali activated fly ash binders , 2015 .

[45]  A. Rawal,et al.  Predictive Model of Setting Times and Compressive Strengths for Low-Alkali, Ambient-Cured, Fly Ash/Slag-Based Geopolymers , 2020, Minerals.

[46]  Arnaud Castel,et al.  Carbonation of a blended slag-fly ash geopolymer concrete in field conditions after 8 years , 2016 .

[47]  J. B. Davison,et al.  THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONCRETE DESIGN, PROCUREMENT AND ON-SITE USE IN STRUCTURES , 2000 .

[48]  N. Kang,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of pore structure in coal ash-based geopolymer using conventional electron tomography , 2014 .

[49]  C. Poon,et al.  Evaluation of environmental impact distribution methods for supplementary cementitious materials , 2018 .

[50]  R. A. F. Peixoto,et al.  Iron ore tailings as a supplementary cementitious material in the production of pigmented cements , 2020 .

[51]  Eva Vejmelková,et al.  Properties of high performance concrete containing fine-ground ceramics as supplementary cementitious material , 2012 .

[52]  E. Pujadas-Gispert,et al.  Linking constructive and energy innovations for a net zero-energy building , 2020 .

[53]  C. Poon,et al.  Feasible use of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash in ultra-high performance concrete , 2020 .

[54]  J. Deventer,et al.  Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art , 2007 .

[55]  Jair Frederico Santoro,et al.  Minimizing environmental impact from optimized sizing of reinforced concrete elements , 2020 .

[56]  J. Deventer,et al.  Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties , 2005 .

[57]  S. K. Adhikary,et al.  Development of flowable ultra-lightweight concrete using expanded glass aggregate, silica aerogel, and prefabricated plastic bubbles , 2020 .

[58]  A. A. Yusuf,et al.  Optimization of production parameters for rice husk ash-based geopolymer cement using response surface methodology , 2020 .

[59]  Arvind Chel,et al.  Renewable energy technologies for sustainable development of energy efficient building , 2017, Alexandria Engineering Journal.

[60]  A. Elmarakbi,et al.  Recent progress in marine foul-release polymeric nanocomposite coatings , 2017 .

[61]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Kinetics of illite dehydroxylation , 2006 .

[62]  Liu Cao,et al.  Quantifying CO2 emissions from China’s cement industry , 2015 .

[63]  Rahman Saidur,et al.  A critical review on energy use and savings in the cement industries , 2011 .

[64]  N. Othman,et al.  Production of eco-friendly hybrid blocks , 2020 .

[65]  E. Pujadas-Gispert,et al.  Design, construction, and thermal performance evaluation of an innovative bio-based ventilated façade , 2020, Frontiers of Architectural Research.

[66]  L. Heller-Kallai,et al.  Dehydroxylation of muscovite: study of quenched samples , 2015, Physics and Chemistry of Minerals.

[67]  Yi-min Zhang,et al.  Preparation of spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst-metakaolin based geopolymer and its process optimization through response surface method , 2020 .

[68]  N. Shah,et al.  Enhancement of the properties of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag based Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete by incorporating Rice Husk Ash , 2018 .

[69]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  Characterization of Moisture Diffusion in Cured Concrete Slabs at Early Ages , 2015 .

[70]  A. Raheem,et al.  Incorporation of metakaolin and nanosilica in blended cement mortar and concrete- A review , 2021 .

[71]  Gui Fang Yang,et al.  Research on Application and Extension of CL System Based on the Low-Carbon Energy Efficient Building Materials , 2012 .