An Annotation Language for Semantic Search of Legal Sources

While formalizing legal sources is an important challenge, the generation of a formal representation from legal texts has been far less considered and requires considerable expertise. In order to improve the uniformity, richness, and efficiency of legal annotation, it is necessary to experiment with annotations and the annotation process. This paper reports on a first experiment, which was a campaign to annotate legal instruments provided by the Scottish Government’s Parliamentary Counsel Office and bearing on Scottish smoking legislation and regulation. A small set of elements related to LegalRuleML was used. An initial guideline manual was produced to annotate the text using annotations related to these elements. The resulting annotated corpus is converted into a LegalRuleML XML compliant document, then made available via an online visualisation and query tool. In the course of annotating the documents, a range of important interpretive and practical issues arose, highlighting the value of a focused study on legal text annotation.

[1]  Stefan Höfler.  Legislative Drafting Guidelines: How Different Are They from Controlled Language Rules for Technical Writing? , 2012, CNL.

[2]  François Lévy,et al.  Formalization of Natural Language Regulations through SBVR Structured English - (Tutorial) , 2013, RuleML.

[3]  R. M. Hare,et al.  Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. , 1965 .

[4]  Sylviane Cardey,et al.  RuleCNL: A Controlled Natural Language for Business Rule Specifications , 2014, CNL.

[5]  Adrian Paschke,et al.  RuleML 1.0: The Overarching Specification of Web Rules , 2010, RuleML.

[6]  Guido Governatori,et al.  LegalRuleML: Design Principles and Foundations , 2015, Reasoning Web.

[7]  François Lévy,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Formalizing Legal Texts in LegalRuleML , 2016, JURIX.

[8]  François Lévy,et al.  On Annotation of the Textual Contents of Scottish Legal Instruments , 2017, JURIX.

[9]  Kar n Fort,et al.  Collaborative Annotation for Reliable Natural Language Processing: Technical and Sociological Aspects , 2016 .

[10]  François Lévy,et al.  Towards a High-Level Controlled Language for Legal Sources on the Semantic Web , 2016, CNL.

[11]  Frank Puppe,et al.  Engineering intelligent systems on the knowledge formalization continuum , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Semantic Web for the Legal Domain: The next step , 2016, Semantic Web.

[13]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Logic programming for large scale applications in law: A formalisation of supplementary benefit legislation , 1987, ICAIL '87.

[14]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi , 2012, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[15]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  LKIF Core: Principled Ontology Development for the Legal Domain , 2009, Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web.