Action errors and dressing disability after stroke: An ecological approach to neuropsychological assessment and intervention

A combination of detailed observation of dressing behaviour and neuropsychological assessment was used to identify the cognitive barriers to independent dressing in a series of eight stroke patients. For those with right hemisphere damage, dressing was disrupted by visuospatial problems or poor sustained attention. Those with left hemisphere damage and ideomotor apraxia were unable to learn the correct procedure to compensate for hemiparesis when dressing. The value of a therapeutic approach based on these observations was assessed in a single-blind randomised multiple-baseline experiment. A baseline phase of conventional dressing therapy which takes no account of individual patterns of cognitive impairment was contrasted with an approach which was formulated for each case. A permutation test demonstrated that there was a significant treatment effect for the right hemisphere cases but there was no therapy-related improvement for those with left or bilateral damage and apraxia. Observation of a naturalistic but controlled task (dressing with a standard item of clothing) appears to allow greater insight into the impact of specific neuropsychological deficits than has been found for more complex naturalistic tasks. The benefits of this ecological approach over conventional approaches to dressing therapy need to be evaluated further in a randomised clinical trial.

[1]  Jacob Van Bowen Single-Case and Small-n Experimental Designs , 2002, Technometrics.

[2]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness , 1998, Nature.

[3]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Assessment and therapy of complex activities of daily living in apraxia , 2001 .

[4]  A Test Battery to Measure the Recovery of Voluntary Movement Control following Stroke , 1988, International rehabilitation medicine.

[5]  R T Knight,et al.  Spatial deficits in ideomotor limb apraxia. A kinematic analysis of aiming movements. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Alan Sunderland,et al.  Dressing after a Stroke: A Survey of Current Occupational Therapy Practice , 2003 .

[7]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  The Naturalistic Action Test: A standardised assessment for everyday action impairment , 2002 .

[8]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Michael W. Montgomery,et al.  Cognitive theory and the study of everyday action disorders after brain damage , 1993 .

[10]  Gianna Cocchini,et al.  The Fluff Test: A simple task to assess body representation neglect , 2001 .

[11]  A. Sunderland,et al.  Impaired dexterity of the ipsilateral hand after stroke and the relationship to cognitive deficit. , 1999, Stroke.

[12]  Pierre Feyereisen,et al.  Disorders of Everyday Actions in Subjects Suffering from Senile Dementia of Alzheimer's Type: An Analysis of Dressing Performance , 1999 .

[13]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  The test of everyday attention , 1994 .

[14]  John Ferron,et al.  Statistical Power of Randomization Tests Used with Multiple-Baseline Designs , 2002 .

[15]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Factors influencing dressing performance after stroke. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Personal Versus Extrapersonal Neglect: A Group Study of their Dissociation Using a Reliable Clinical Test , 1997, Cortex.

[17]  D. Wade,et al.  Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. , 1992, Current opinion in neurology and neurosurgery.

[18]  L. Rapport,et al.  Validation of the Warrington theory of visual processing and the Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. , 1998, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[19]  M. Walker,et al.  The impact of cognitive impairment on upper body dressing difficulties after stroke: a video analysis of patterns of recovery. , 2004, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  D. Kimura,et al.  Acquisition of a motor skill after left-hemisphere damage. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Georg Goldenberg Sonja Hagmann,et al.  Therapy of Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Apraxia , 1998 .

[22]  T. Manly Cognitive rehabilitation for unilateral neglect: Review , 2002 .

[23]  John Todman,et al.  Single-case and Small-n Experimental Designs : A Practical Guide To Randomization Tests , 2001 .

[24]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Dissociations in Routine Behaviour across Patients and Everyday Tasks , 2002, Neurocase.

[25]  C. Dougan,et al.  A NEUROLOGIST'S APPROACH TO THE IMMUNOSUPPRESSED PATIENT , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[26]  L. Vignolo,et al.  Latent sensory aphasia in hemisphere-damaged patients: an experimental study with the Token Test. , 1966, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  M. Lezak Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. , 1995 .

[28]  K. Heilman,et al.  A Cognitive Neuropsychological Model of Limb Praxis , 1991 .

[29]  A. Sunderland,et al.  Ideomotor apraxia, visuomotor control and the explicit representation of posture , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  D. Kimura,et al.  Motor functions of the left hemisphere. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people , 1994 .

[32]  N. Lincoln,et al.  Evaluation of dressing practice for stroke patients after discharge from hospital: a crossover design study , 1996 .

[33]  M. Annett,et al.  Five Tests of Hand Skill , 1992, Cortex.