Intraoperative assessment of technical perfection in carotid endarterectomy: a prospective analysis of 1305 completion procedures. Collaborators of the EVEREST study group. Eversion versus standard carotid endartectomy.

OBJECTIVE to define the incidence of technical defects and the impact of technical errors on ipsilateral carotid occlusion, ipsilateral stroke, and early restenosis rates, we analysed 1305 patients undergoing carotid completion procedures. DESIGN prospective multicentre study. PATIENTS AND METHODS adequacy of CEA was assessed intraoperatively by angiography in 1004 (77%), by angioscopy in 299 (22%), and by duplex scan in two patients (1%). Arteriograms and angioscopic findings were interpreted at the time of the procedure by the operating surgeon, who also established the need for immediate surgical revision. RESULTS perioperatively, 13 major strokes (0.9%, all ipsilateral) and six deaths (0.4%) were recorded. Overall, 112 defects (9%) were identified intraoperatively: 81 (72%) were located in the common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA), and 31 (28%) in the external carotid artery. In 48 patients (4%) the defects were revised. Logistic regression analysis revealed that carotid plaque extension >2 cm on the ICA was a positive independent predictor of CEA defects (odds ratio (OR) 1.5p=0.03). A significant association was found between the incidence of revised defects of the CCA and ICA and perioperative ipsilateral stroke (OR 11.5p=0.0002). In contrast, patients with minor non-revised defects had an ipsilateral stroke rate comparable to that of patients with no defects (p=0.4). No significant association was found between revised or non-revised defects and occurrence of restenosis/occlusion at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS the incidence of major technical defects during CEA is low, yet the perioperative neurological prognosis of patients with major defects warranting revision is poor. Completion angiography or angioscopy and possible correction of defects did not protect per se from an unfavourable early outcome after CEA. Therefore, surgical excellence is mandatory to achieve satisfactory results after CEA.

[1]  S. Berman,et al.  The Influence of Routine Completion Arteriography on Outcome following Carotid Endarterectomy , 1997, Annals of vascular surgery.

[2]  A. J. Roon,et al.  Intraoperative arteriography and carotid surgery. , 1992, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  A. Branchereau,et al.  Value of angioscopy for intraoperative assessment of carotid endarterectomy. , 1995, Annals of vascular surgery.

[4]  J. Lohr,et al.  Effects of completion angiography on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy. , 1995, Cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  M. Donaldson,et al.  Impact of Completion Angiography on Operative Conduct and Results of Carotid Endarterectomy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[6]  G. Sethi,et al.  Perioperative stroke during carotid endarterectomy: the value of intraoperative angiography. , 1982, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  G. Seabrook,et al.  The importance of intraoperative detection of residual flow abnormalities after carotid artery endarterectomy. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  D. Ratliff,et al.  A comparison of quality control methods applied to carotid endarterectomy. , 1996, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[9]  Kyle A. Lingenfelter,et al.  Intraoperative assessment of carotid endarterectomy: A comparison of techniques , 1995, Annals of vascular surgery.

[10]  M. Debakey.  Regarding "A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: study design and preliminary results: the Everest trial". , 1998, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  V. Parsonnet,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy and completion contact arteriography. , 1984, Journal of vascular surgery.

[12]  C. Andersen,et al.  Routine operative arteriography during carotid endarterectomy: a reassessment. , 1978, Surgery.

[13]  J. Ricotta,et al.  Completion angiography, is it really necessary? , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[14]  Jernigan Wr,et al.  The efficacy of routine completion operative angiography in reducing the incidence of perioperative stroke associated with carotid endarterectomy. , 1984 .

[15]  P. Sandercock,et al.  A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project--1981-86. 2. Incidence, case fatality rates and overall outcome at one year of cerebral infarction, primary intracerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhage. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  P. Bergeron,et al.  Routine intraoperative carotid angiography: its impact on operative morbidity and carotid restenosis. , 1986, Journal of Vascular Surgery.