Neurologists' understanding and management of conversion disorder

Background Conversion disorder is largely managed by neurologists, for whom it presents great challenges to understanding and management. This study aimed to quantify these challenges, examining how neurologists understand conversion disorder, and what they tell their patients. Methods A postal survey of all consultant neurologists in the UK registered with the Association of British Neurologists. Results 349 of 591 practising consultant neurologists completed the survey. They saw conversion disorder commonly. While they endorsed psychological models for conversion, they diagnosed it according to features of the clinical presentation, most importantly inconsistency and abnormal illness behaviour. Most of the respondents saw feigning as entangled with conversion disorder, with a minority seeing one as a variant of the other. They were quite willing to discuss psychological factors as long as the patient was receptive but were generally unwilling to discuss feigning even though they saw it as their responsibility. Those who favoured models in terms of feigning were older, while younger, female neurologists preferred psychological models, believed conversion would one day be understood neurologically and found communicating with their conversion patients easier than it had been in the past. Discussion Neurologists accept psychological models for conversion disorder but do not employ them in their diagnosis; they do not see conversion as clearly different from feigning. This may be changing as younger, female neurologists endorse psychological views more clearly and find it easier to discuss with their patients.

[1]  S. Wessely,et al.  Differential effects of pre and post-payment on neurologists' response rates to a postal survey , 2010, BMC neurology.

[2]  P. Auer,et al.  Medically unexplained symptoms as a threat to patients' identity? A conversation analysis of patients' reactions to psychosomatic attributions. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[3]  S. Wessely,et al.  The origins of factitious disorder , 2010, History of the human sciences.

[4]  S. Wessely,et al.  Limits to truth-telling: Neurologists’ communication in conversion disorder , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  A. Lang,et al.  Opinions and clinical practices related to diagnosing and managing patients with psychogenic movement disorders: An international survey of movement disorder society members , 2009, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[6]  S. Wessely,et al.  In the psychiatrist's chair: how neurologists understand conversion disorder , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  M. Reuber,et al.  What is it like to receive a diagnosis of nonepileptic seizures? , 2009, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[8]  W. LaFrance,et al.  What is “treatment as usual” for nonepileptic seizures? , 2008, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[9]  M. Hallett Psychogenic movement disorders: A crisis for neurology , 2006, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[10]  C. Dowrick,et al.  The somatising effect of clinical consultation: what patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[11]  L. O’Malley,et al.  Understanding the narratives of people who live with medically unexplained illness. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[12]  M. Trimble,et al.  ‘Hysteria’, ‘Functional' or ‘Psychogenic’? a Survey of British Neurologists’ Preferences , 1991, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[13]  I Pilowsky,et al.  A general classification of abnormal illness behaviours. , 1978, The British journal of medical psychology.

[14]  S. Wessely,et al.  Factitious disorders in neurology: an analysis of reported cases. , 2010, Psychosomatics.