Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model

Previous research on risks in complex green building projects has been mainly focused on what the risks are and how they may impact on project objectives. Such studies have tended toward an inward looking perspective that treats risks in isolation from one another. In reality, most risks are interrelated and associated with internal or external project stakeholders. To address this research gap, this current research developed a Social Network Analysis (SNA) based stakeholder-associated risk analysis method to assess and analyse the risks and their interactions in complex green building projects. A case study was conducted to highlight the green-specific risks and their profiles, together with the proposed mitigation actions. The research results presented in this paper may broaden researchers and construction professionals' awareness of influential risks in green building projects and enhance their ability to perceive, understand, assess, and mitigate the risks in an effective and efficient way; thereby achieving higher performance in strategic risk management and stakeholder communication in green building project management.

[1]  Jaime Rivera-Camino,et al.  Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: a stakeholder perspective , 2007 .

[2]  S. Zeng,et al.  The drivers for contractors' green innovation: an industry perspective , 2010 .

[3]  Robert Ries,et al.  Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes , 2006 .

[4]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[5]  Morten Elle,et al.  Learning from the social construction of environmental indicators: From the retrospective to the pro-active use of SCOT in technology development , 2010 .

[6]  K. T. Yeo Risks, Classification of Estimates, and Contingency Management , 1990 .

[7]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises , 1998 .

[8]  Hugo Priemus,et al.  Institutional Barriers to Sustainable Construction , 2002 .

[9]  Morten Elle,et al.  Environmental indicators: establishing a common language for green building , 2006 .

[10]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks , 1989 .

[11]  Thomas Lützkendorf,et al.  Sustainability in property valuation: theory and practice , 2008 .

[12]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[13]  David R. Riley Procurement of sustainable construction services in the United States: the contractor’s role in green buildings , 2004 .

[14]  David Arditi,et al.  Towards Advanced Solutions for Achieving Sustainability Goals in Buildings: Lessons Learned from Case Studies , 2012 .

[15]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Interactions-based risk clustering methodologies and algorithms for complex project management , 2013 .

[16]  D. Pujari,et al.  Green and competitive: Influences on environmental new product development performance , 2003 .

[17]  Salvatore Parise Knowledge Management and Human Resource Development: An Application in Social Network Analysis Methods , 2007 .

[18]  Jing Huang,et al.  Identifying the critical factors for green construction - An empirical study in China , 2013 .

[19]  Patrick X.W. Zou,et al.  Managing risks in green building supply chain , 2012 .

[20]  R. Freeman The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions , 1994, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[21]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[22]  Robert L. K. Tiong BOT projects: Risks and securities , 1990 .

[23]  A. J. Smith,et al.  Privatized infrastructure : the build operate transfer approach , 1995 .

[24]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  Social Sustainability Considerations during Planning and Design: Framework of Processes for Construction Projects , 2013 .

[25]  Patrick X.W. Zou,et al.  Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China , 2007 .

[26]  Yun Yin,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Understanding the Potency of Risk Connectivity , 2011 .

[27]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Motivating stakeholders to deliver environmental change , 2011 .

[28]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[29]  C K Chau,et al.  Factors affecting the implementation of green specifications in construction. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Achieving the Green Building Council of Australia's World Leadership Rating in an Office Building in Perth , 2012 .

[31]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[32]  Darren A. Prum,et al.  Green Building Claims: What Theories Will a Plaintiff Pursue, Who Has Exposure, and a Proposal for Risk Mitigation , 2008 .

[33]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  The role of local governments in fostering ‘green’ buildings: a case study , 2001 .

[34]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Trends and patterns in strategic technology partnering since the early seventies , 1996 .

[35]  Rebecca L. Henn,et al.  Overcoming the Social and Psychological Barriers to Green Building , 2008 .

[36]  Irem Dikmen,et al.  RISK MAPPING IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2012 .

[37]  M. Loosemore,et al.  Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure , 2007 .

[38]  Yun Le,et al.  Turning Green to Gold in the Construction Industry: Fable or Fact? , 2013 .

[39]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[40]  Vittal S. Anantatmula,et al.  Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction , 2011 .

[41]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Safety Risk Quantification for High Performance Sustainable Building Construction , 2012 .

[42]  X. Xue,et al.  Stakeholder management in construction : an empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies , 2011 .

[43]  H Ren,et al.  Risk lifecycle and risk relationships on construction projects , 1994 .

[44]  Magali Paris,et al.  Institutionnal dynamics and barriers to sustainable construction in France, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands , 2009 .

[45]  F. Medda A game theory approach for the allocation of risks in transport public private partnerships , 2007 .

[46]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[47]  Marta Maria Sesana,et al.  Overview on life cycle methodologies and economic feasibility for nZEBs , 2013 .

[48]  Theodore S. Glickman,et al.  Using hazard networks to determine risk reduction strategies , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[49]  W. M. Bowler,et al.  The Hidden Power of Social Networks , 2004 .

[50]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[51]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Construction ecology and metabolism: natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment , 2000 .

[52]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[53]  Xiaohua Jin,et al.  Critical Risks Influencing the Application of EERTs in Australian Green Office Buildings , 2012 .

[54]  Stephen Pryke,et al.  Social Network Analysis in Construction , 2012 .

[55]  Mark R. Gleim,et al.  Green marketing strategies: an examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present , 2011 .

[56]  Liyin Shen,et al.  Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hong Kong , 2006 .

[57]  K. Williams,et al.  What is stopping sustainable building in England? Barriers experienced by stakeholders in delivering sustainable developments , 2007 .

[58]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  The rhetoric of adaptive reuse or reality of demolition: Views from the field , 2010 .

[59]  Nils Larsson,et al.  Green Building Challenge: the development of an idea , 2001 .

[60]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  How “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials , 2012 .