Performance of multiple fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs with consideration of multiple mechanisms

Summary Gas flow in shales is believed to result from a combination of several mechanisms, including desorption, diffusion, viscous flow and the effect of stress-sensitivity of reservoir permeability. However, little work has been done in literature to simultaneously incorporate all these mechanisms in well testing models for shale gas reservoirs. This paper presents a new well testing model for multiple fractured horizontal wells (MFHW) in shale gas reservoirs with consideration of desorption, diffusive flow, viscous flow and stress-sensitivity of reservoir permeability. Comparing with current well testing models for MFHW, the model presented here takes into consideration more mechanisms controlling shale gas flow, which is more in line with the actual reservoir situation. Laplace transformation, point source function, perturbation method, numerical discrete method and Gaussian elimination method are employed to solve the well testing model. The pressure transient responses are then inverted into real time space with Stehfest numerical inversion algorithm. Type curves are plotted, and different flow regimes in shale gas reservoirs are identified. The effects of relevant parameters are analyzed as well. The presented model can be used to interpret pressure data more accurately for shale gas reservoirs and provide more accurate dynamic parameters which are important for efficient reservoir development.

[1]  J. P. Spivey,et al.  Forecasting Long-Term Gas Production of Dewatered Coal Seams and Fractured Gas Shales , 1995 .

[2]  Roberto Aguilera,et al.  Modeling Fractured Horizontal Wells As Dual Porosity Composite Reservoirs - Application To Tight Gas, Shale Gas And Tight Oil Cases , 2011 .

[3]  Jingjing Guo,et al.  Pressure Transient Analysis for Multi-stage Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2012 .

[4]  D. E. Lancaster,et al.  Identifying and Estimating Desorption From Devonian Shale Gas Production Data , 1989 .

[5]  Eric S. Carlson,et al.  Devonian shale gas production: mechanisms and simple models , 1991 .

[6]  George J. Moridis,et al.  A Numerical Study of Microscale Flow Behavior in Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoir Systems , 2011 .

[7]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Modeling of Fluid Transfer From Shale Matrix to Fracture Network , 2010 .

[8]  H. Ahmadi,et al.  Application of Linear Flow Analysis to Shale Gas Wells - Field Cases , 2010 .

[9]  A. Aboaba,et al.  Estimation of Fracture Properties for a Horizontal Well with Multiple Hydraulic Fractures in Gas Shale , 2010 .

[10]  Gao Chao,et al.  Modeling Multilayer Gas Reservoirs Including Sorption Effects , 1994 .

[11]  F. Kucuk,et al.  Analysis of Simultaneously Measured Pressure and Sandface Flow Rate in Transient Well Testing (includes associated papers 13937 and 14693 ) , 1985 .

[12]  A. C. Bumb,et al.  Gas-well testing in the presence of desorption for coalbed methane and devonian shale , 1988 .

[13]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Productivity Changes in Reservoirs With Stress-Dependent Permeability , 2004 .

[14]  Walter K. Sawyer,et al.  Transient Flow In Naturally Fractured Reservoirs And Its Application To Devonian Gas Shales , 1980 .

[15]  Roland N. Horne,et al.  Relative Productivities and Pressure Transient Modeling of Horizontal Wells with Multiple Fractures , 1995 .

[16]  J. E. Warren,et al.  The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs , 1963 .

[17]  W. Chambers San Antonio, Texas , 1940 .

[18]  Jitendra Kikani,et al.  Perturbation Analysis of Stress-Sensitive Reservoirs (includes associated papers 25281 and 25292 ) , 1991 .

[19]  C. Cipolla,et al.  Reservoir Modeling in Shale-Gas Reservoirs , 2010 .

[20]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Comparison of Fractured-Horizontal-Well Performance in Tight Sand and Shale Reservoirs , 2011 .

[21]  C. M. Freeman A Numerical Study of Microscale Flow Behavior in Tight Gas and Shale Gas , 2010 .

[22]  A. V. Everdingen,et al.  The Skin Effect and Its Influence on the Productive Capacity of a Well , 1953 .

[23]  A. Gringarten,et al.  Superposition Principle and Reciprocity for Pressure Transient Analysis of Data From Interfering Wells , 2009 .

[24]  Robert A. Wattenbarger,et al.  Multi-stage Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Shale Gas Well Rate Transient Analysis , 2010 .

[25]  O. A. Pedrosa Pressure Transient Response in Stress-Sensitive Formations , 1986 .

[26]  Fred P. Wang,et al.  Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales , 2009 .