Multivariate phenotypic selection on a complex sexual signal

Animal signals are complex, comprising multiple components that receivers may use to inform their decisions. Components may carry information of differing value to receivers, and selection on one component could modulate or reverse selection on another, necessitating a multivariate approach to estimating selection gradients. However, surprisingly few empirical studies have estimated the strength of phenotypic selection on complex signals with appropriate design and adequate power to detect nonlinear selection. We used phonotaxis assays to measure sexual selection on the advertisement signal of Cope's gray tree frog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Female preferences were assessed for five signal components using single‐ and two‐stimulus behavioral assays. Linear, quadratic, and correlational selection gradients were estimated from the single‐stimulus data. Significant directional selection is acting on call duration, call rate, pulse rate, and relative amplitude; stabilizing selection is acting on call duration and call rate. Under the two‐stimulus paradigm, conclusions were qualitatively different, revealing nonlinear selection on all components except call duration. For individual subjects, the outcomes of single‐ and two‐stimulus trials were frequently discordant, suggesting that the choice of testing paradigm may affect conclusions drawn from experiments.

[1]  M. Ryan Female Mate Choice in a Neotropical Frog , 1980, Science.

[2]  Gerhardt Hc Phonotactic selectivity in two cryptic species of gray treefrogs: effects of differences in pulse rate, carrier frequency and playback level. , 2008 .

[3]  William E. Wagner Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  William E. Wagner Convergent song preferences between female field crickets and acoustically orienting parasitoid flies , 1996 .

[5]  N. Caithness,et al.  Calling behaviour influences mating success in male painted reed frogs, Hyperolius marmoratus , 2010 .

[6]  Louise S. Mead,et al.  Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. , 1985, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[8]  M. Blows,et al.  Measuring Nonlinear Selection , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[9]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) , 2002 .

[10]  M. Ryan,et al.  Sexual selection and signal evolution : the ghost of biases past , 1993 .

[11]  K. Shaw,et al.  Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Scott K. Sakaluk,et al.  Gecko phonotaxis to cricket calling song: A case of satellite predation , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Gerald S. Pollack,et al.  Phonotactic specificity of the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus: intensity-dependent selectivity for temporal parameters of the stimulus , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[16]  M. Blum,et al.  Exposure to an environmental estrogen breaks down sexual isolation between native and invasive species , 2012, Evolutionary applications.

[17]  J. Byers,et al.  Female mate choice based upon male motor performance , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  M. Morris Female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis: the importance of identifying the scale of choice , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  W. Potts,et al.  Paternity in horseshoe crabs when spawning in multiple-male groups , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Søren Højsgaard,et al.  The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations , 2005 .

[21]  William H. Cade,et al.  Acoustically Orienting Parasitoids: Fly Phonotaxis to Cricket Song , 1975, Science.

[22]  S. Castellano,et al.  Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the European green toad , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  An experimental test of noise-dependent voice amplitude regulation in Cope’s grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[26]  A. Møller,et al.  Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Female impersonation as an alternative reproductive strategy in giant cuttlefish , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  U. Candolin The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[29]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  S. Nowicki,et al.  Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test , 2004 .

[31]  J. M. Hoekstra,et al.  The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[32]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Within-male variability in call properties and female preference in the grey treefrog , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  W. Hippel,et al.  Beyond waist-hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive , 2009 .

[34]  K. Wells,et al.  Calling energetics of a neotropical treefrog, Hyla microcephala , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  Johannes Schul,et al.  Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Hybridization in the Diploid-Tetraploid Treefrogs Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor , 1994 .

[37]  K. Schrode,et al.  Female preferences for spectral call properties in the western genetic lineage of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  J. Godin,et al.  Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  J. Travis The Role of Optimizing Selection in Natural Populations , 1989 .

[41]  D. Papaj,et al.  Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Phenotypic divergence but not genetic distance predicts assortative mating among species of a cichlid fish radiation , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[44]  H. Gerhardt ADVERTISEMENT‐CALL PREFERENCES IN DIPLOID‐TETRAPLOID TREEFROGS (HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS AND HYLA VERSICOLOR): IMPLICATIONS FOR MATE CHOICE AND THE EVOLUTION OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  J. Ward,et al.  Mate choice based on complex visual signals in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans , 2009 .

[46]  K. Wells,et al.  The effect of social interactions on calling energetics in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Multitasking males and multiplicative females: dynamic signalling and receiver preferences in Cope's grey treefrog , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  Edward C. Chao,et al.  Generalized Estimating Equations , 2003, Technometrics.

[49]  M. Morris,et al.  A mechanism for female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[50]  B. Sullivan Sexual Selection in the Great Plains Toad (Bufo Cognatus) , 1983 .

[51]  M. Jennions,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR MULTIVARIATE STABILIZING SEXUAL SELECTION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  Yezhong Tang,et al.  Bigger Is Not Always Better: Females Prefer Males of Mean Body Size in Philautus odontotarsus , 2016, PloS one.

[53]  M. Ryan,et al.  Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[54]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Multiple messages in acoustic signals , 1992 .

[55]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Noise affects the shape of female preference functions for acoustic signals , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[57]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  M. Zuk,et al.  Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids , 1998, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[59]  B. Sullivan,et al.  Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  G. Klump,et al.  Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.

[61]  J. Schwartz,et al.  How long do females really listen? Assessment time for female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  J. Schul,et al.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  VISUALIZING MULTIVARIATE SELECTION , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[64]  J. Mappes,et al.  Sexual selection in the wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata: female preference for drum duration and pulse rate , 2002 .

[65]  M. J. Keller,et al.  Polyploidy alters advertisement call structure in gray treefrogs , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[66]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Chapter 6 Anuran Acoustic Signal Perception in Noisy Environments , 2013 .

[67]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[68]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Multivariate Female Choice in Gray Treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): Evidence for Directional and Stabilizing Selection , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[69]  M. Jennions,et al.  Complex Multivariate Sexual Selection on Male Acoustic Signaling in a Wild Population of Teleogryllus commodus , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[70]  J. Endler,et al.  FEMALE GUPPIES AGREE TO DIFFER: PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC VARIATION IN MATE‐CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR SEXUAL SELECTION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[71]  K. Wells,et al.  Energetics of vocalization by an anuran amphibian (Hyla versicolor) , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[72]  A. Welch,et al.  Advertisement call duration indicates good genes for offspring feeding rate in gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[73]  K. Shaw,et al.  Multivariate sexual selection in a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[74]  Sarah R Partan,et al.  Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[75]  Louise S. Mead,et al.  Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection , 2005, Experientia.

[76]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[77]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) , 2002 .

[78]  S. Castellano,et al.  The Advertisement Call of the European Treefrogs (Hyla arborea): A Multilevel Study of Variation , 2002 .

[79]  M. Blows A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[80]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[81]  J. Bro-Jørgensen Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[82]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  Estimating Nonlinear Selection Gradients Using Quadratic Regression Coefficients: Double Or Nothing? , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[83]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[84]  D. Berrigan,et al.  Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  M. Blows,et al.  Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.