Multivariate phenotypic selection on a complex sexual signal
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ruth G Shaw | Mark A Bee | R. Shaw | Jessie C Tanner | J. Ward | Jessica L Ward | M. Bee
[1] M. Ryan. Female Mate Choice in a Neotropical Frog , 1980, Science.
[2] Gerhardt Hc. Phonotactic selectivity in two cryptic species of gray treefrogs: effects of differences in pulse rate, carrier frequency and playback level. , 2008 .
[3] William E. Wagner. Measuring female mating preferences , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[4] William E. Wagner. Convergent song preferences between female field crickets and acoustically orienting parasitoid flies , 1996 .
[5] N. Caithness,et al. Calling behaviour influences mating success in male painted reed frogs, Hyperolius marmoratus , 2010 .
[6] Louise S. Mead,et al. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. , 1985, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[7] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[8] M. Blows,et al. Measuring Nonlinear Selection , 2003, The American Naturalist.
[9] H. Gerhardt,et al. Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) , 2002 .
[10] M. Ryan,et al. Sexual selection and signal evolution : the ghost of biases past , 1993 .
[11] K. Shaw,et al. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[12] H. Gerhardt,et al. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.
[13] Scott K. Sakaluk,et al. Gecko phonotaxis to cricket calling song: A case of satellite predation , 1984, Animal Behaviour.
[14] Mark A. Bee,et al. Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[15] Gerald S. Pollack,et al. Phonotactic specificity of the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus: intensity-dependent selectivity for temporal parameters of the stimulus , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[16] M. Blum,et al. Exposure to an environmental estrogen breaks down sexual isolation between native and invasive species , 2012, Evolutionary applications.
[17] J. Byers,et al. Female mate choice based upon male motor performance , 2010, Animal Behaviour.
[18] M. Morris. Female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis: the importance of identifying the scale of choice , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[19] W. Potts,et al. Paternity in horseshoe crabs when spawning in multiple-male groups , 2000, Animal Behaviour.
[20] Søren Højsgaard,et al. The R Package geepack for Generalized Estimating Equations , 2005 .
[21] William H. Cade,et al. Acoustically Orienting Parasitoids: Fly Phonotaxis to Cricket Song , 1975, Science.
[22] S. Castellano,et al. Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the European green toad , 1998, Animal Behaviour.
[23] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Acoustic spectral preferences in two cryptic species of grey treefrogs: implications for mate choice and sensory mechanisms , 2005, Animal Behaviour.
[24] Mark A. Bee,et al. An experimental test of noise-dependent voice amplitude regulation in Cope’s grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis , 2010, Animal Behaviour.
[25] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.
[26] A. Møller,et al. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[27] T. Tregenza,et al. Female impersonation as an alternative reproductive strategy in giant cuttlefish , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[28] U. Candolin. The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[29] Mark A. Bee,et al. Parallel female preferences for call duration in a diploid ancestor of an allotetraploid treefrog , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[30] S. Nowicki,et al. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test , 2004 .
[31] J. M. Hoekstra,et al. The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[32] H. Gerhardt,et al. Within-male variability in call properties and female preference in the grey treefrog , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[33] W. Hippel,et al. Beyond waist-hip ratio: experimental multivariate evidence that average women's torsos are most attractive , 2009 .
[34] K. Wells,et al. Calling energetics of a neotropical treefrog, Hyla microcephala , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[35] Johannes Schul,et al. Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[36] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Hybridization in the Diploid-Tetraploid Treefrogs Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor , 1994 .
[37] K. Schrode,et al. Female preferences for spectral call properties in the western genetic lineage of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[38] S. J. Arnold,et al. THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[39] J. Godin,et al. Female mate choice under predation risk in the guppy , 1996, Animal Behaviour.
[40] J. Travis. The Role of Optimizing Selection in Natural Populations , 1989 .
[41] D. Papaj,et al. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[42] H. Gerhardt,et al. Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[43] O. Seehausen,et al. Phenotypic divergence but not genetic distance predicts assortative mating among species of a cichlid fish radiation , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[44] H. Gerhardt. ADVERTISEMENT‐CALL PREFERENCES IN DIPLOID‐TETRAPLOID TREEFROGS (HYLA CHRYSOSCELIS AND HYLA VERSICOLOR): IMPLICATIONS FOR MATE CHOICE AND THE EVOLUTION OF COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[45] J. Ward,et al. Mate choice based on complex visual signals in the brook stickleback, Culaea inconstans , 2009 .
[46] K. Wells,et al. The effect of social interactions on calling energetics in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[47] Mark A. Bee,et al. Multitasking males and multiplicative females: dynamic signalling and receiver preferences in Cope's grey treefrog , 2013, Animal Behaviour.
[48] Edward C. Chao,et al. Generalized Estimating Equations , 2003, Technometrics.
[49] M. Morris,et al. A mechanism for female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[50] B. Sullivan. Sexual Selection in the Great Plains Toad (Bufo Cognatus) , 1983 .
[51] M. Jennions,et al. EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR MULTIVARIATE STABILIZING SEXUAL SELECTION , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[52] Yezhong Tang,et al. Bigger Is Not Always Better: Females Prefer Males of Mean Body Size in Philautus odontotarsus , 2016, PloS one.
[53] M. Ryan,et al. Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases , 1992, The American Naturalist.
[54] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Multiple messages in acoustic signals , 1992 .
[55] B. Ronacher,et al. Noise affects the shape of female preference functions for acoustic signals , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[56] T. Mitchell-Olds,et al. REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[57] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. SPECIATION BY POLYPLOIDY IN TREEFROGS: MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF THE TETRAPLOID, HYLA VERSICOLOR , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[58] M. Zuk,et al. Exploitation of Sexual Signals by Predators and Parasitoids , 1998, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[59] B. Sullivan,et al. Female choice and selection on male calling behaviour in the grey treefrog Hyla versicolor , 1992, Animal Behaviour.
[60] G. Klump,et al. Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.
[61] J. Schwartz,et al. How long do females really listen? Assessment time for female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 2004, Animal Behaviour.
[62] J. Schul,et al. Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[63] S. J. Arnold,et al. VISUALIZING MULTIVARIATE SELECTION , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[64] J. Mappes,et al. Sexual selection in the wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata: female preference for drum duration and pulse rate , 2002 .
[65] M. J. Keller,et al. Polyploidy alters advertisement call structure in gray treefrogs , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[66] Mark A. Bee,et al. Chapter 6 Anuran Acoustic Signal Perception in Noisy Environments , 2013 .
[67] H. Gerhardt,et al. Preferences based on spectral differences in acoustic signals in four species of treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.
[68] H. Gerhardt,et al. Experimental Analysis of Multivariate Female Choice in Gray Treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): Evidence for Directional and Stabilizing Selection , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[69] M. Jennions,et al. Complex Multivariate Sexual Selection on Male Acoustic Signaling in a Wild Population of Teleogryllus commodus , 2006, The American Naturalist.
[70] J. Endler,et al. FEMALE GUPPIES AGREE TO DIFFER: PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC VARIATION IN MATE‐CHOICE BEHAVIOR AND THE CONSEQUENCES FOR SEXUAL SELECTION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[71] K. Wells,et al. Energetics of vocalization by an anuran amphibian (Hyla versicolor) , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.
[72] A. Welch,et al. Advertisement call duration indicates good genes for offspring feeding rate in gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[73] K. Shaw,et al. Multivariate sexual selection in a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[74] Sarah R Partan,et al. Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.
[75] Louise S. Mead,et al. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection , 2005, Experientia.
[76] D. Blumstein. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .
[77] H. Gerhardt,et al. Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) , 2002 .
[78] S. Castellano,et al. The Advertisement Call of the European Treefrogs (Hyla arborea): A Multilevel Study of Variation , 2002 .
[79] M. Blows. A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[80] G. Box,et al. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .
[81] J. Bro-Jørgensen. Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[82] S. J. Arnold,et al. Estimating Nonlinear Selection Gradients Using Quadratic Regression Coefficients: Double Or Nothing? , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[83] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[84] D. Berrigan,et al. Strength and tempo of directional selection in the wild , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[85] M. Blows,et al. Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.