On Relativisation and Complexity Gap

We study the proof complexity of Taut, the class of Second-Order Existential (SO∃) logical sentences which fail in all finite models. The Complexity-Gap theorem for Tree-like Resolution says that the shortest Tree-like Resolution refutation of any such sentence Φ is either fully exponential, \(2^{\Omega \left(n\right)}\), or polynomial, \(n^{O\left(1\right)}\), where n is the size of the finite model. Moreover, there is a very simple model-theoretics criteria which separates the two cases: the exponential lower bound holds if and only if Φ holds in some infinite model.

[1]  Eli Ben-Sasson,et al.  Near Optimal Separation Of Tree-Like And General Resolution , 2004, Comb..

[2]  Jan Krajícek,et al.  Bounded arithmetic, propositional logic, and complexity theory , 1995, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications.

[3]  Zvi Galil,et al.  Proceedings of the 30th IEEE symposium on Foundations of computer science , 1994, FOCS 1994.

[4]  Pavel Pudlák Proofs as Games , 2000, Am. Math. Mon..

[5]  Maria Luisa Bonet,et al.  A study of proof search algorithms for resolution and polynomial calculus , 1999, 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.99CB37039).

[6]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  Simplified and improved resolution lower bounds , 1996, Proceedings of 37th Conference on Foundations of Computer Science.

[7]  Armin Haken,et al.  The Intractability of Resolution , 1985, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Søren Riis,et al.  Tree resolution proofs of the weak pigeon-hole principle , 2001, Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[9]  Jan Krajícek Combinatorics of first order structures and propositional proof systems , 2004, Arch. Math. Log..

[10]  Søren Riis A complexity gap for tree resolution , 2001, computational complexity.