Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

A trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement was arranged according to a changeover-key procedure, including a changeover delay of 1.5 sec. The three schedules provided a combined maximum reinforcement rate of 45 reinforcements per hour. With that restriction, the nine experimental conditions included several combinations of variable-interval schedules, sometimes including extinction. The pigeons matched relative response rate and relative time to relative reinforcement rate. Relative time appeared to match some-what better than relative response rate. Performance adjusted rapidly from one experimental condition to the next, whether the change involved two or all three schedules of the concurrent trio.

[1]  A. Catania,et al.  Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  G. S. Reynolds On some determinants of choice in pigeons. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  C. Shimp,et al.  Choice between concurrent schedules. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  W Temple,et al.  Preference for fixed-interval terminal links in a three-key concurrent chain schedule. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.