Lubrication Oil Degradation Trajectory Prognosis with ARIMA and Bayesian Models

In order to predict lubrication oil degradation, it is important to analyze the degradation trajectory in detail. Lubrication oil degradation is influenced by numerous factors e.g. oil replenishment, oil filtering, operating conditions and system maintenance etc. that need to be considered for accurate degradation prediction. Degradation trajectory prediction provides the remaining useful life (RUL). Whereas the analysis of degradation influencing factors with their roles in prediction provides opportunity to extend or control the RUL. This paper analyzes the lubrication oil degradation trajectory under the influence of oil replenishment. We consider a data correction strategy and prognosis for lubrication oil degradation using the auto-regressive integrated moving-average (ARIMA) and Bayesian dynamic linear model (BDLM) approaches. Degradation data is generated using model-based simulations. The prediction models are then tested on the simulated degradation data set. This study exemplifies the method to find the underlying degradation model considering and identifying the degradation influencing factors.

[1]  O. P. Gandhi,et al.  RUL assessment of lube oil using AHP and vector projection approach , 2006 .

[2]  Jan M. van Noortwijk,et al.  A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Rong Li,et al.  Residual-life distributions from component degradation signals: A Bayesian approach , 2005 .

[4]  M. Kumar,et al.  Bayesian estimation of reliability using time-to-failure distribution of parametric degradation models , 2018 .

[5]  Peter Kipruto Chemweno,et al.  A review on lubricant condition monitoring information analysis for maintenance decision support , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[6]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Fang Bai Performance Reliability Modeling Based on ARIMA Model , 2012 .

[8]  Mitra Fouladirad,et al.  Model selection for degradation modeling and prognosis with health monitoring data , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Ute Beyer,et al.  Bayesian Forecasting And Dynamic Models , 2016 .

[10]  Wei Wu,et al.  Prognostics of Machine Health Condition using an Improved ARIMA-based Prediction method , 2007, 2007 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.

[11]  Jiang Zhe,et al.  Lubricating oil conditioning sensors for online machine health monitoring – A review , 2017 .

[12]  Junhong Mao,et al.  Modeling and experimental investigations on the relationship between wear debris concentration and wear rate in lubrication systems , 2017 .

[13]  Liyun Xu,et al.  Remaining Useful Life Based Maintenance Policy for Deteriorating Systems Subject to Continuous Degradation and Shock , 2018 .

[14]  Yaguo Lei,et al.  Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Bernardo Tormos,et al.  Analytical approach to wear rate determination for internal combustion engine condition monitoring based on oil analysis , 2003 .