Down the Penrose stairs: How selection for fewer recombination hotspots maintains their existence

In many species, meiotic recombination events tend to occur in narrow intervals of the genome, known as hotspots. In humans and mice, double strand break (DSB) hotspot locations are determined by the DNA-binding specificity of the zinc finger array of the PRDM9 protein, which is rapidly evolving at residues in contact with DNA. Previous models explained this rapid evolution in terms of the need to restore PRDM9 binding sites lost to gene conversion over time, under the assumption that more PRDM9 binding always leads to more DSBs. In recent experimental work, however, it has become apparent that PRDM9 binding on both homologs facilitates DSB repair, and moreover that, in the absence of enough symmetric binding, meiosis no longer progresses reliably. We therefore consider the possibility that the benefit of PRDM9 stems from its role in coupling DSB formation and efficient repair. To this end, we model the evolution of PRDM9 from first principles: from its binding dynamics to the population processes that govern the evolution of the zinc finger array and its binding sites in the genome. As we show, the loss of a small number of strong binding sites leads to the use of a greater number of weaker ones, resulting in a sharp reduction in symmetric binding and favoring new PRDM9 alleles that restore the use of a smaller set of strong binding sites. This decrease in PRDM9 binding symmetry and in its ability to promote DSB repair drive the rapid zinc finger turnover. These results imply that the advantage of new PRDM9 alleles is in limiting the number of binding sites used effectively, rather than in increasing net PRDM9 binding, as previously believed. By extension, our model suggests that the evolutionary advantage of hotspots may have been to increase the efficiency of DSB repair and/or homolog pairing.

[1]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Altering the Binding Properties of PRDM9 Partially Restores Fertility across the Species Boundary , 2021, Molecular biology and evolution.

[2]  J. Forejt,et al.  Hybrid sterility genes in mice (Mus musculus): a peculiar case of PRDM9 incompatibility. , 2021, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[3]  David Cohen,et al.  African Americans , 2021, Race Talk in a Mexican Cantina.

[4]  J. Forejt,et al.  Chromosome-wide characterization of meiotic noncrossovers (gene conversions) in mouse hybrids. , 2020, Genetics.

[5]  A. Nussenzweig,et al.  Dual histone methyl reader ZCWPW1 facilitates repair of meiotic double strand breaks in male mice , 2020, eLife.

[6]  Jiang Liu,et al.  The histone modification reader ZCWPW1 links histone methylation to PRDM9-induced double strand break repair , 2019 .

[7]  A. Nussenzweig,et al.  Dual Histone Methyl Reader ZCWPW1 Facilitates Repair of Meiotic Double Strand Breaks , 2019, bioRxiv.

[8]  R. Camerini-Otero,et al.  Histone methyltransferase PRDM9 is not essential for meiosis in male mice , 2019, Genome research.

[9]  L. Ferretti,et al.  PRDM9 Diversity at Fine Geographical Scale Reveals Contrasting Evolutionary Patterns and Functional Constraints in Natural Populations of House Mice , 2019, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Factors influencing meiotic recombination revealed by whole-genome sequencing of single sperm , 2019, Science.

[11]  Yun S. Song,et al.  Inference and analysis of population-specific fine-scale recombination maps across 26 diverse human populations , 2019, Science Advances.

[12]  V. Jansen,et al.  PRDM9 and the evolution of recombination hotspots. , 2019, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Evolution of the Yeast Recombination Landscape. , 2018, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  S. Myers,et al.  A high-resolution map of non-crossover events reveals impacts of genetic diversity on mammalian meiotic recombination , 2018, Nature Communications.

[15]  I. Henderson,et al.  Hotspots for Initiation of Meiotic Recombination , 2018, Front. Genet..

[16]  R. Camerini-Otero,et al.  Interrogating the Functions of PRDM9 Domains in Meiosis , 2018, Genetics.

[17]  L. Duret,et al.  PRDM9 Methyltransferase Activity Is Essential for Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Break Formation at Its Binding Sites. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[18]  L. Duret,et al.  The Red Queen model of recombination hot-spot evolution: a theoretical investigation , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  J. Forejt,et al.  Modulation of Prdm9-controlled meiotic chromosome asynapsis overrides hybrid sterility in mice , 2017, bioRxiv.

[20]  A. Tóth,et al.  The PRDM9 KRAB domain is required for meiosis and involved in protein interactions , 2017, Chromosoma.

[21]  Julian Lange,et al.  Genomic and chromatin features shaping meiotic double-strand break formation and repair in mice , 2017, bioRxiv.

[22]  M. Gut,et al.  In vivo binding of PRDM9 reveals interactions with noncanonical genomic sites. , 2017, Genome research.

[23]  Catrina A. Spruce,et al.  PRDM9 interactions with other proteins provide a link between recombination hotspots and the chromosomal axis in meiosis , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[24]  M. Przeworski,et al.  Repeated losses of PRDM9-directed recombination despite the conservation of PRDM9 across vertebrates , 2016, bioRxiv.

[25]  M. Przeworski,et al.  Repeated losses of PRDM 9-directed recombination despite the conservation of PRDM 9 across vertebrates , 2017 .

[26]  C. L. Baker,et al.  The Meiotic Recombination Activator PRDM9 Trimethylates Both H3K36 and H3K4 at Recombination Hotspots In Vivo , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[27]  M. Rockman,et al.  Fine-Scale Crossover Rate Variation on the Caenorhabditis elegans X Chromosome , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[28]  R. Camerini-Otero,et al.  The evolutionary turnover of recombination hot spots contributes to speciation in mice , 2016, Genes & development.

[29]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Re-engineering the zinc fingers of PRDM9 reverses hybrid sterility in mice , 2016, Nature.

[30]  Harry Hemingway,et al.  Health and population effects of rare gene knockouts in adult humans with related parents , 2015, Science.

[31]  S. Keeney,et al.  Nonparadoxical evolutionary stability of the recombination initiation landscape in yeast , 2015, Science.

[32]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Cattle Sex-Specific Recombination and Genetic Control from a Large Pedigree Analysis , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[33]  Gil McVean,et al.  Stable recombination hotspots in birds , 2015, Science.

[34]  M. Noor,et al.  Recombining without Hotspots: A Comprehensive Evolutionary Portrait of Recombination in Two Closely Related Species of Drosophila , 2015, bioRxiv.

[35]  I. Henderson,et al.  Epigenetic control of meiotic recombination in plants , 2015, Science China Life Sciences.

[36]  August E. Woerner,et al.  The Time-Scale of Recombination Rate Evolution in Great Apes , 2015, bioRxiv.

[37]  C. L. Baker,et al.  PRDM9 Drives Evolutionary Erosion of Hotspots in Mus musculus through Haplotype-Specific Initiation of Meiotic Recombination , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[38]  S. Keeney,et al.  Mouse tetrad analysis provides insights into recombination mechanisms and hotspot evolutionary dynamics , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[39]  P. Boursot,et al.  Diversity of Prdm9 Zinc Finger Array in Wild Mice Unravels New Facets of the Evolutionary Turnover of this Coding Minisatellite , 2014, PloS one.

[40]  M. Rockman,et al.  Crossover Heterogeneity in the Absence of Hotspots in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2013, Genetics.

[41]  Jan Kadlec,et al.  Molecular basis for the regulation of the H3K4 methyltransferase activity of PRDM9. , 2013, Cell reports.

[42]  M. Noor,et al.  How Hot Are Drosophila Hotspots? Examining Recombination Rate Variation and Associations with Nucleotide Diversity, Divergence, and Maternal Age in Drosophila pseudoobscura , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  A. Auton,et al.  Genetic Recombination Is Targeted towards Gene Promoter Regions in Dogs , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[44]  Julian Lange,et al.  Numerical constraints and feedback control of double-strand breaks in mouse meiosis. , 2013, Genes & development.

[45]  C. L. Baker,et al.  DNA binding specificities of the long zinc-finger recombination protein PRDM9 , 2013, Genome Biology.

[46]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Recombination regulator PRDM9 influences the instability of its own coding sequence in humans , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  P. Andolfatto,et al.  Revisiting an Old Riddle: What Determines Genetic Diversity Levels within Species? , 2012, PLoS biology.

[48]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk , 2012, Nature.

[49]  Tom Druet,et al.  Genetic Variants in REC8, RNF212, and PRDM9 Influence Male Recombination in Cattle , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[50]  Ryan D. Hernandez,et al.  A Fine-Scale Chimpanzee Genetic Map from Population Sequencing , 2012, Science.

[51]  Kevin Brick,et al.  Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice , 2012, Nature.

[52]  C. Grey,et al.  Mouse PRDM9 DNA-Binding Specificity Determines Sites of Histone H3 Lysine 4 Trimethylation for Initiation of Meiotic Recombination , 2011, PLoS biology.

[53]  Yongtao Guan,et al.  Variation in Human Recombination Rates and Its Genetic Determinants , 2011, PloS one.

[54]  F. Úbeda,et al.  The Red Queen theory of recombination hotspots , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[55]  Linda Odenthal-Hesse,et al.  PRDM9 variation strongly influences recombination hot-spot activity and meiotic instability in humans , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[56]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Drive Against Hotspot Motifs in Primates Implicates the PRDM9 Gene in Meiotic Recombination , 2010, Science.

[57]  K. Paigen,et al.  Prdm9 Controls Activation of Mammalian Recombination Hotspots , 2010, Science.

[58]  G. Coop,et al.  PRDM9 Is a Major Determinant of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in Humans and Mice , 2010, Science.

[59]  R. Emerson,et al.  Extraordinary Molecular Evolution in the PRDM9 Fertility Gene , 2009, PloS one.

[60]  C. Ponting,et al.  Accelerated Evolution of the Prdm9 Speciation Gene across Diverse Metazoan Taxa , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[61]  A. D. Peters A Combination of cis and trans Control Can Solve the Hotspot Conversion Paradox , 2008, Genetics.

[62]  F. Baudat,et al.  Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis , 2007, Chromosome Research.

[63]  G. Coop,et al.  Live Hot, Die Young: Transmission Distortion in Recombination Hotspots , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[64]  Y. Matsui,et al.  A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase , 2005, Nature.

[65]  R. Redfield,et al.  Persistence and Loss of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots , 2005, Genetics.

[66]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Comparison of Fine-Scale Recombination Rates in Humans and Chimpanzees , 2005, Science.

[67]  Matthew Stephens,et al.  Absence of the TAP2 Human Recombination Hotspot in Chimpanzees , 2004, PLoS biology.

[68]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Reciprocal crossover asymmetry and meiotic drive in a human recombination hot spot , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[69]  R. Redfield,et al.  The hotspot conversion paradox and the evolution of meiotic recombination. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  A. Nicolas,et al.  An initiation site for meiotic gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1989, Nature.

[71]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Intrachromosomal gene conversion and the maintenance of sequence homogeneity among repeated genes. , 1982, Genetics.

[72]  O. J. Pinochet [Health and population]. , 1971, Revista medica de Chile.

[73]  K. Mather Genetic Recombination , 1960, Nature.