Transparency, consistency and modularity of strategic reasoning: An agent architecture for interactive business simulations

Interactive business simulations are widely used to explore and compare business strategies from both practice and theory. In many business simulations however, educators and researchers lack support in observing how the simulated actors operationalize their strategies, in validating whether operations have been aligned with the strategy, and also in (re)configuring available player and opponent strategies based on new theoretical or practical insights. This paper specifies requirements for a novel business simulation architecture that facilitates transparency, consistency and modularity of strategic decision making by simulated actors in interactive business simulations. A system architecture is proposed that integrates three components: an extensible agent middleware, a distributed simulation engine and a modular reasoning framework. How the architecture fulfills the three requirements of strategic reasoning transparency, consistency and modularity is illustrated in a use case of a business simulation game for supply chain management education.

[1]  Timo Lainema.  Perspective Making , 2009 .

[2]  Norman M. Sadeh,et al.  TAC-03 - A Supply-Chain Trading Competition , 2003, AI Mag..

[3]  Michael Winikoff,et al.  Prometheus: a methodology for developing intelligent agents , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[4]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Theory of modeling and simulation , 1976 .

[5]  Peter H. M. Jacobs,et al.  An architecture for distributed simulation games , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[6]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  The Real-Time Global Supply Chain Game: New Educational Tool for Developing Supply Chain Management Professionals , 2006, Transportation Journal.

[7]  Agostino Poggi,et al.  Developing Multi-agent Systems with JADE , 2007, ATAL.

[8]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Training for today's supply chains: an introduction to the distributor game , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[9]  Frances M. T. Brazier,et al.  Scalable Middleware Environment for Agent-Based Internet Applications , 2004, PARA.

[10]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  How Serious are serious games? Some lessons from Infra-games , 2005, DiGRA Conference.

[11]  R. Wood,et al.  Mental Models, Decision Rules, and Performance Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[12]  P. Vermeulen,et al.  Policy gaming for strategy and change , 2007 .

[13]  Federico Pasin,et al.  The impact of a simulation game on operations management education , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Supporting parametrization of business games for multiple educational settings , 2007, 2007 Winter Simulation Conference.

[15]  A. J. Faria,et al.  A Survey of Simulation Game Users, Former-Users, and Never-Users , 2004 .

[16]  Frances M. T. Brazier,et al.  AgentScape: Middleware, Resource Management, and Services , 2002 .

[17]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  A plug and play pathway approach for operations management games development , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[18]  P. Anderson,et al.  Business Simulations and Cognitive Learning , 2009 .

[19]  A. S. Roa,et al.  AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language , 1996 .

[20]  H AndersonPhilip,et al.  Business Simulations and Cognitive Learning , 2009 .

[21]  Wolfgang Ketter,et al.  Smart Grid Economics: Policy Guidance Through Competitive Simulation , 2010 .

[22]  Peter H. M. Jacobs,et al.  The DSOL simulation suite , 2005 .

[23]  Michael Winikoff,et al.  The goal-oriented design of agent systems: a refinement of Prometheus and its evaluation , 2009, Int. J. Agent Oriented Softw. Eng..

[24]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  D-SOL; a distributed Java based discrete event simulation architecture , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[25]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason (Wiley Series in Agent Technology) , 2007 .

[26]  John Washbush,et al.  A Review of Scholarship on Assessing Experiential Learning Effectiveness , 2004 .

[27]  Precha Thavikulwat,et al.  A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management , 2010 .

[28]  Martin K. Purvis,et al.  Declarative Agent Programming Support for a FIPA-Compliant Agent Platform , 2005, PROMAS.

[29]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Theory of Modeling and Simulation: Integrating Discrete Event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems , 2000 .

[30]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Learn more, better and faster: computer-based simulation gaming of production and operations , 2005 .

[31]  Maria L. Gini,et al.  Toward Human-Agent Competition in TAC SCM , 2009 .

[32]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[33]  Gary J. Summers.  Today’s Business Simulation Industry , 2004 .

[34]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  From simulation to gaming: an object-oriented supply chain training library , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[36]  J. Wolfe.  A History of Business Teaching Games in English-Speaking and Post-Socialist Countries: The Origination and Diffusion of a Management Education and Development Technology , 1993 .

[37]  Steven C. Gold,et al.  Developments in Business Gaming , 2009 .

[38]  Stijn-Pieter A. van Houten,et al.  A suite for developing and using business games: supporting supply chain business games in a distributed context , 2007 .