Sound localization in noise in hearing-impaired listeners.

The present study assesses the ability of four listeners with high-frequency, bilateral symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss to localize and detect a broadband click train in the frontal-horizontal plane, in quiet and in the presence of a white noise. The speaker array and stimuli are identical to those described by Lorenzi et al. (in press). The results show that: (1) localization performance is only slightly poorer in hearing-impaired listeners than in normal-hearing listeners when noise is at 0 deg azimuth, (2) localization performance begins to decrease at higher signal-to-noise ratios for hearing-impaired listeners than for normal-hearing listeners when noise is at +/- 90 deg azimuth, and (3) the performance of hearing-impaired listeners is less consistent when noise is at +/- 90 deg azimuth than at 0 deg azimuth. The effects of a high-frequency hearing loss were also studied by measuring the ability of normal-hearing listeners to localize the low-pass filtered version of the clicks. The data reproduce the effects of noise on three out of the four hearing-impaired listeners when noise is at 0 deg azimuth. They reproduce the effects of noise on only two out of the four hearing-impaired listeners when noise is at +/- 90 deg azimuth. The additional effects of a low-frequency hearing loss were investigated by attenuating the low-pass filtered clicks and the noise by 20 dB. The results show that attenuation does not strongly affect localization accuracy for normal-hearing listeners. Measurements of the clicks' detectability indicate that the hearing-impaired listeners who show the poorest localization accuracy also show the poorest ability to detect the clicks. The inaudibility of high frequencies, "distortions," and reduced detectability of the signal are assumed to have caused the poorer-than-normal localization accuracy for hearing-impaired listeners.

[1]  L. Rayleigh,et al.  XII. On our perception of sound direction , 1907 .

[2]  Richard A. Campbell,et al.  XLIX Localization Difficulty in Monaurally Impaired Listeners , 1960 .

[3]  Robert A. Butler,et al.  Role of Stimulus Frequency and Duration in the Phenomenon of Localization Shifts , 1964 .

[4]  A Quaranta,et al.  Masking level difference in normal and pathological ears. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  J. W. Wagener,et al.  Auditory Lateralization: Age Differences in Sensitivity to Dichotic Time and Amplitude Cues , 1977 .

[6]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  H S Colburn,et al.  Binaural interaction of impaired listeners. A review of past research. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  M A Fernandes,et al.  Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  J H Grose,et al.  NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  W Noble,et al.  A comparison of different binaural hearing aid systems for sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[11]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  F. Wightman,et al.  A model of head-related transfer functions based on principal components analysis and minimum-phase reconstruction. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  W. Noble,et al.  Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S. Abel,et al.  Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  R. Gilkey,et al.  Sound localization in noise: the effect of signal-to-noise ratio. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Effects of masker envelope distribution on binaural masking at high frequencies: Evidence for the influence of peripheral compression? , 1997 .

[17]  C. Lorenzi,et al.  Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.