Probabilistic assessment of plan-asymmetric structures under the near-fault pulse-like events considering soil–structure interaction

This study aims to evaluate the torsional effects and soil–structure interaction simultaneously under near-fault pulse-like earthquakes in a probabilistic framework. Incremental dynamic analysis and fragility curves are employed for this goal. An eight-story R/C dual lateral load-resistant building consisting of shear walls and moment resisting frames is used. The median incremental dynamic analysis curves reported the maximum capacity for the symmetric structure in each foundation conditions. In addition, the capacity of structure will be increased when more shear wave velocity is assumed. Therefore, from this view, neglecting the soil–structure interaction will not be in the safe side. Fragility curves (using intensity measure directly) show that for different cases (except for very low shear wave velocity), more value of eccentricity leads to more probability of collapse. Moreover, the fragility curves show that (for each eccentricity), soil–structure interaction effect is significant only for the flexible base structure with the very low shear wave velocity (100 m/s) and more eccentricity value leads to less soil–structure interaction effects. Results show that the significant eccentricity value may lead to reduce the soil–structure interaction effect in the shear-wall structures under the near-fault events.

[1]  Chi-Chang Lin,et al.  Systematic assessment of irregular building-soil interaction using efficient modal analysis , 2001 .

[2]  Giorgio Monti,et al.  Seismic behavior of single‐story asymmetric‐plan buildings under uniaxial excitation , 2009 .

[3]  Mario E. Rodriguez,et al.  Seismic response and damage analysis of buildings supported on flexible soils , 2000 .

[4]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[5]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  Estimation of inelastic displacement ratios for soil-structure systems with embedded foundation considering kinematic and inertial interaction effects , 2018 .

[6]  Stavros A. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Earthquake induced torsion in buildings:critical review and state of the art , 2015 .

[7]  H. Shakib,et al.  Dynamic soil–structure interaction effects on the seismic response of asymmetric buildings , 2004 .

[8]  H. Krawinkler,et al.  Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motions on Frame Structures , 2001 .

[9]  Amir M. Halabian,et al.  Spatial distribution of ductility demand and damage index in 3D RC frame structures considering directionality effects , 2015 .

[10]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[11]  A. M. Chandler,et al.  Effect of transverse load-resisting elements on inelastic earthquake response of eccentric-plan buildings , 1994 .

[12]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic fragility relationships of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings , 2009 .

[13]  Khaled Galal,et al.  Effect of soil conditions on the response of reinforced concrete tall structures to near‐fault earthquakes , 2008 .

[14]  Sekhar Chandra Dutta,et al.  Seismic Demand of Low-Rise Multistory Systems with General Asymmetry , 2012 .

[15]  Mohammad S. Birzhandi,et al.  Inelastic response of bi-eccentric-plan asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings , 2014 .

[16]  Abbie B. Liel,et al.  The effect of near‐fault directivity on building seismic collapse risk , 2012 .

[17]  J. Wolf Dynamic soil-structure interaction , 1985 .

[18]  Fernando Lopez-Caballero,et al.  EFFECT OF THE INELASTIC DYNAMIC SOIL–STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON THE SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT , 2011 .

[19]  Aman Mwafy,et al.  Analytically derived fragility relationships for the modern high‐rise buildings in the UAE , 2012 .

[20]  Degao Zou,et al.  Response to the discussion on “Seismic reliability assessment of earth-rockfill dam slopes considering strain-softening of rockfill based on generalized probability density evolution method” , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[21]  Amir M. Halabian,et al.  Effect of foundation flexibility on response of concrete frame structures under near-fault ground motions , 2014 .

[22]  Mohammad Ali Ghannad,et al.  The effect of soil–structure interaction on damage index of buildings , 2008 .

[23]  X. Kong,et al.  Seismic fragility for high CFRDs based on deformation and damage index through incremental dynamic analysis , 2018 .

[24]  Degao Zou,et al.  Stochastic seismic performance assessment of high CFRDs based on generalized probability density evolution method , 2018 .

[25]  Giorgio Monti,et al.  Nonlinear Response of Two-Way Asymmetric Single-Story Building under Biaxial Excitation , 2011 .

[26]  Amir M. Halabian,et al.  Incremental dynamic collapse analysis of RC core-wall tall buildings considering spatial seismic response distributions , 2017 .

[27]  W. K. Tso,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of torsionally unbalanced systems designed using elastic dynamic analysis , 1994 .

[28]  Hernan Santa-Maria,et al.  Inelastic response of one‐storey asymmetric‐plan systems subjected to bi‐directional earthquake motions , 1999 .

[29]  Chunxiang Li,et al.  Effectiveness of active multiple‐tuned mass dampers for asymmetric structures considering soil–structure interaction effects , 2012 .

[30]  Mohammad S. Birzhandi,et al.  Application of 2DMPA method in develpoing fragility curves of plan-asymmetric structures , 2017 .

[31]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  New Three-Dimensional Damage Index for RC Buildings with Planar Irregularities , 2006 .

[32]  Luis Esteva,et al.  Influence of dynamic soil–structure interaction on the nonlinear response and seismic reliability of multistorey systems , 2007 .

[33]  Hezha Sadraddin Fragility Assessment of High-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2015 .

[34]  H. Shakib,et al.  Evaluation of dynamic eccentricity by considering soil–structure interaction: a proposal for seismic design codes , 2004 .

[35]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Torsional Coupling and Earthquake Response of Simple Elastic and Inelastic Systems , 1981 .

[36]  Charles A. Kircher,et al.  Development of Building Damage Functions for Earthquake Loss Estimation , 1997 .

[37]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Understanding the inelastic seismic behaviour of asymmetric-plan buildings , 1995 .

[38]  J. L. Humar,et al.  Effect of orthogonal inplane structural elements on inelastic torsional response , 1999 .

[39]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of a slender RC shear wall considering soil–structure interaction effects , 2011 .

[40]  Abdolreza S. Moghadam,et al.  Approximate two-component incremental dynamic analysis using a bidirectional energy-based pushover procedure , 2018 .

[41]  E. Brunesi,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of the seismic response of precast wall connections , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[42]  Mohammad S. Birzhandi,et al.  A new simplified approach for assessing nonlinear seismic response of plan-asymmetric structures considering soil-structure interaction , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[43]  Stavros A. Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Inelastic torsion of multistorey buildings under earthquake excitations , 2005 .

[44]  Jianbing Chen,et al.  The probability density evolution method for dynamic response analysis of non‐linear stochastic structures , 2006 .

[45]  Abdolreza S. Moghadam,et al.  Seismic progressive collapse assessment of 3-story RC moment resisting buildings with different levels of eccentricity in plan , 2013 .

[46]  Alberto Pavese,et al.  Mechanical model for seismic response assessment of lightly reinforced concrete walls , 2016 .

[47]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Quantitative Classification of Near-Fault Ground Motions Using Wavelet Analysis , 2007 .

[48]  Egidio Rizzi,et al.  Assessment of Frequency versus Time Domain enhanced technique for response-only modal dynamic identification under seismic excitation , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[49]  Abdolreza S. Moghadam,et al.  Fragility-Based Performance Evaluation of Asymmetric Single-Story Buildings in Near Field and Far Field Earthquakes , 2010 .

[50]  Mohsen Ghafory-Ashtiany,et al.  Collapse behavior evaluation of asymmetric buildings subjected to bi‐directional ground motion , 2015 .

[51]  A. M. Halabian,et al.  Damage Index Distributions in RC Dual Lateral Load-Resistant Multi-Story Buildings Considering SSI Effects Under Bidirectional Earthquakes , 2018 .

[52]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Fragility relationships for torsionally-imbalanced buildings using three-dimensional damage characterization , 2007 .

[53]  John W. Wallace,et al.  Behavior, design, and modeling of structural walls and coupling beams — Lessons from recent laboratory tests and earthquakes , 2012, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials.

[54]  Manuel Archila,et al.  Nonlinear response of high-rise buildings: effect of directionality of ground motions , 2011 .

[55]  Ernesto F. Cruz,et al.  Parametric study of the non-linear seismic response of three-dimensional building models , 2006 .

[56]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .