On the shoulders of giants: undertaking a structured literature review in accounting

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to present a method for a structured literature review (SLR). An SLR is a method for examining a corpus of scholarly literature, to develop insights, critical reflections, future research paths and research questions. SLRs are common in scientific disciplines dominated by quantitative approaches, but they can be adapted in accounting studies since quantitative and qualitative approaches are commonly accepted. Design/methodology/approach - – A literature review, as a piece of academic writing, must have a logical, planned structure. The authors also argue it requires tests based on qualitative and quantitative methods. Therefore, the authors describe ten steps for developing an SLR. Findings - – The SLR method is a way that scholars can stand “on the shoulders of giants” and provide insightful and impactful research that is different to the traditional authorship approaches to literature reviews. Research limitations/implications - – Traditional literature reviews can have varied results because of a lack of rigour. SLRs use a process that, through a set of rules, potentially offers less bias and more transparency of the execution and measures and techniques of validation and reliability. Practical implications - – SLRs provide an approach that can help academics to discover under-investigated topics and methods, nurturing, therefore, the development of new knowledge areas and research approaches. Originality/value - – The paper presents accounting researchers with an opportunity to develop insightful and publishable studies, and also serves as a basis for developing future research agendas in the accounting field. The authors advocate the SLR method especially to higher degree research students and emerging scholars as a way of potentially developing robust and defensible research agendas and questions.

[1]  John Dumay,et al.  Reflections on interdisciplinary accounting research: the state of the art of intellectual capital , 2014 .

[2]  A. Griffin,et al.  In Search of the Classics: A Study of the Impact of JPIM Papers from 1984 to 2003 , 2010 .

[3]  John Dumay,et al.  Public sector knowledge management: a structured literature review , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  David Smith,et al.  A Review of Australian Management Accounting Research: 1980-2009 , 2011 .

[5]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: articles and their characteristics , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Citation classics published in Knowledge Management journals. Part II: studying research trends and discovering the Google Scholar Effect , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[8]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Changes in the Public Sector: A Review of Recent“Alternative” Accounting Research , 1992 .

[9]  A. Armstrong.,et al.  The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury. , 1956 .

[10]  E Garfield,et al.  "Science Citation Index"--A New Dimension in Indexing. , 1964, Science.

[11]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Mark Petticrew,et al.  Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  S. Baldi Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations : A network-analytic model , 1998 .

[14]  C. Nielsen,et al.  The nature and extent of voluntary intellectual capital disclosures by Australian and UK biotechnology companies , 2010 .

[15]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[16]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[17]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  The future of interpretive accounting research-A polyphonic debate , 2008 .

[18]  C. Pope,et al.  Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[19]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[20]  C. Nielsen,et al.  Intellectual Capital in Japanese IPO Prospectuses , 2009 .

[21]  James Guthrie,et al.  Reflections and projections: 25 years of interdisciplinary perspectives on accounting, auditing and accountability research , 2011 .

[22]  John Dumay,et al.  A review and critique of content analysis as a methodology for inquiring into IC disclosure , 2014 .

[23]  C. Hart Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. , 1998 .

[24]  Joshua Schimel Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded , 2011 .

[25]  John Dumay,et al.  Writing an article for a refereed accounting journal , 2014 .

[26]  C. Franklin,et al.  Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2001 .

[27]  Thomas A. Lee,et al.  The editorial gatekeepers of the accounting academy , 1997 .

[28]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Public Sector to Public Services: 20 Years of 'Contextual' Accounting Research , 2007 .

[29]  Michael Gibbins,et al.  Evidence About Auditor-Client Management Negotiation Concerning Client's Financial Reporting , 2000 .

[30]  Jeasik Cho,et al.  Validity in qualitative research revisited , 2006 .

[31]  J. Mouritsen Problematising intellectual capital research: ostensive versus performative IC , 2006 .

[32]  Mary Dixon-Woods,et al.  Systematic reviews and qualitative methods , 2009 .

[33]  R. Petty,et al.  INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL LITERATURE REVIEW: MEASUREMENT, REPORTING AND MANAGEMENT , 2000 .

[34]  John Dumay,et al.  Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating intellectual capital disclosure : a critique , 2015 .

[35]  Jill L. McKinnon Reliability and Validity in Field Research: Some Strategies and Tactics , 1988 .

[36]  M. Hammersley On 'systematic' reviews of research literatures: A 'narrative' response to Evans & Benefield , 2001 .

[37]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[38]  J. Flower The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure , 2015 .

[39]  Michael D. Shields Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s , 1997 .

[40]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base , 2006 .

[41]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Disclosure of information on intellectual capital in Danish IPO prospectuses , 2005 .

[42]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[43]  T. Scandura,et al.  Research Methodology In Management: Current Practices, Trends, And Implications For Future Research , 2000 .

[44]  John Dumay Reflective discourse about intellectual capital: research and practice , 2009 .

[45]  Sven Modell In defence of triangulation: A critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting , 2009 .

[46]  Tom Smith,et al.  A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region , 2015 .

[47]  Graeme L. Harrison,et al.  Cross-cultural research in management control systems design: a review of the current state , 1999 .

[48]  M. Alvesson Doing critical management research , 2000 .

[49]  Federica Ricceri,et al.  Intellectual capital disclosure (ICD): A comparison of Italy and the UK , 2006 .

[50]  R. Gray,et al.  W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting , 2013 .

[51]  H. Davey,et al.  Chinese and English language versions: intellectual capital disclosure , 2013 .

[52]  James Guthrie,et al.  Past, present and possible future developments in human capital accounting : a tribute to Jan-Erik Gröjer , 2009 .

[53]  Rosalind H. Whiting,et al.  Firm characteristics and intellectual capital disclosure by Australian companies , 2011 .

[54]  Andrew Goddard,et al.  Contemporary public sector accounting research – An international comparison of journal papers , 2010 .

[55]  C. Gallois,et al.  Mapping a 40-Year History With Leximancer: Themes and Concepts in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 2010 .

[56]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Building Better Theory by Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide , 2006 .

[57]  T. Stanley,et al.  Wheat from Chaff: Meta-Analysis as Quantitative Literature Review: Response , 2001 .

[58]  R. Gray Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? , 2006 .

[59]  Alfred J. Nanni,et al.  Means versus ends: a review of the literature on Japanese management accounting , 1995 .

[60]  Z. Hoque 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research , 2014 .

[61]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[62]  Sandy Q. Qu,et al.  The qualitative research interview , 2011 .

[63]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research , 2012 .

[64]  L. Striukova,et al.  Corporate Reporting of Intellectual Capital: Evidence from UK Companies , 2007 .

[65]  L. Parker Developing research journals and qualitative inquiry: the role of the editorial board , 2007 .

[66]  Jonas Gerdin,et al.  Structuration theory in accounting research: Applications and applicability § , 2014 .

[67]  Gary McCulloch,et al.  Succeeding with Your Doctorate , 2005 .

[68]  P. Cronin,et al.  Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. , 2008, British journal of nursing.

[69]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[70]  John Dumay,et al.  Construction of research articles in the leading interdisciplinary accounting journals , 2013 .

[71]  John Dumay,et al.  Intellectual capital measurement: a critical approach , 2009 .

[72]  G. Glass Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[73]  John Dumay,et al.  15 years of the Journal of Intellectual Capital and counting : a manifesto for transformational IC research , 2014 .

[74]  Alexander Brüggen,et al.  Determinants of intellectual capital disclosure: evidence from Australia , 2009 .

[75]  G. Marx Of methods and manners for aspiring sociologists: 37 moral imperatives , 1997 .

[76]  John Dumay,et al.  Academic performance, publishing and peer review: peering into the twilight zone , 2015 .

[77]  C. Mills The Sociological Imagination , 1959 .

[78]  L. Parker Social and environmental accountability research: A view from the commentary box , 2005 .

[79]  Ariela Caglio,et al.  A review and discussion of management control in inter-firm relationships: Achievements and future directions , 2008 .

[80]  D. Silverman Doing Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[81]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visual representations in knowledge management: framework and cases , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[82]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .