Enhanced visual perception with occipital transcranial magnetic stimulation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the occipital pole can produce an illusory percept of a light flash (or ‘phosphene’), suggesting an excitatory effect. Whereas previous reported effects produced by single‐pulse occipital pole TMS are typically disruptive, here we report the first demonstration of a location‐specific facilitatory effect on visual perception in humans. Observers performed a spatial cueing orientation discrimination task. An orientation target was presented in one of two peripheral placeholders. A single pulse below the phosphene threshold applied to the occipital pole 150 or 200 ms before stimulus onset was found to facilitate target discrimination in the contralateral compared with the ipsilateral visual field. At the 150‐ms time window contralateral TMS also amplified cueing effects, increasing both facilitation effects for valid cues and interference effects for invalid cues. These results are the first to show location‐specific enhanced visual perception with single‐pulse occipital pole stimulation prior to stimulus presentation, suggesting that occipital stimulation can enhance the excitability of visual cortex to subsequent perception.

[1]  C. Miniussi,et al.  New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Michael Erb,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced phosphenes and scotomas , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Neural adaptation reveals state‐dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Resting electroencephalogram alpha-power over posterior sites indexes baseline visual cortex excitability , 2008, Neuroreport.

[5]  V. Walsh,et al.  Perceptual Load Modulates Visual Cortex Excitability to Magnetic Stimulation , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Transient visual field defects induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over human occipital pole , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  V. Walsh,et al.  State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  A P Rudell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in study of the visual pathway. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[10]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  The Functional Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Signal Suppression or Neural Noise Generation? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  L. Battelli,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of visual area V5 in migraine , 2002, Neurology.

[12]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[13]  Thomas Kammer,et al.  Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Contrasting early visual cortical activation states causally involved in visual imagery and short‐term memory , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Impairment of visual perception and visual short term memory scanning by transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  L. Merabet,et al.  Occipital Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Has Opposing Effects on Visual and Auditory Stimulus Detection: Implications for Multisensory Interactions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Using state‐dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex: a comparison of TMS‐priming and TMS‐adaptation paradigms , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  S. Los,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Tony Ro,et al.  Feedback Contributions to Visual Awareness in Human Occipital Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.

[20]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in posterior alpha-band EEG activity reflect variability in excitability of human visual areas. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  B U Meyer,et al.  Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[22]  L. Cohen,et al.  Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Neurology.

[23]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2008, Brain Topography.

[24]  A. Cowey,et al.  Striate cortex (V1) activity gates awareness of motion , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  V. Amassian,et al.  Suppression of visual perception by magnetic coil stimulation of human occipital cortex. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  K. Welch,et al.  Brain excitability in migraine: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation studies. , 1998, Current opinion in neurology.

[28]  Y Kamitani,et al.  Effects of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on functional brain activity: a combined event-related TMS and evoked potential study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  L. Merabet,et al.  Visual Phosphene Perception Modulated by Subthreshold Crossmodal Sensory Stimulation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Cowey,et al.  Magnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers , 2000, Neuroreport.

[31]  T. Kammer,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. I. The psychophysics of visual suppression , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.