Designing for Mutability in Information Systems Artifacts

This paper aims to extend understanding of the nature of information systems and technology (IS/IT) artifacts and the manner in which information systems design theories address the mutable nature of these artifacts. The term ‘semizoa’ is introduced to refer to IS/IT artifacts as mutable systems that exhibit some of the characteristics of living creatures and that are only in part designable. It is shown that the mutability of semizoa can be both constrained and enabled in IS design theories, using concepts of homeostasis, situated action, autopoiesis, learning, evolution, emergence and redesign. Consideration of the range and nature of these characteristics provides a source of ideas for systems designers in designing for specific IS meta-requirements. In addition, we show that IS design theories should include a reflective structural component dealing with the mutability of not only the system state but also its structure (schema). The paper contributes by addressing the lack of attention to the distinctive characteristics of IS/IT artifacts and by extending current ideas of design theories and theorising.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Applications of machine learning and rule induction , 1995, CACM.

[2]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[3]  Arno Scharl,et al.  Evolutionary Web Development , 2000, Applied Computing.

[4]  J. Mingers.  An introduction to autopoiesis—Implications and applications , 1989 .

[5]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  The Foundation Role for Theories of Agency in Understanding Information Systems Design , 2002, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Dianne Hall,et al.  Building a Theoretical Foundation for a Learning-Oriented Knowledge Management System , 2003 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[8]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[9]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Turing award lecture , 1985, ACM '85.

[10]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  Making Manufacturing Practices Tacit: A Case Study of Computer-Aided Production Management and Lean Production , 1995 .

[11]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[12]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[13]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[14]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Decision support systems : an organizational perspective , 1978 .

[15]  Bo Dahlbom,et al.  The New Informatics , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  E. F. Codd,et al.  Relational database: a practical foundation for productivity , 1982, CACM.

[17]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[18]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[19]  Thomas Erickson.  Ask Not for Whom the Cell Phone Tolls: Some Problems with the Notion of Context-Aware Computing* , 2001 .

[20]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[21]  Lida Xu,et al.  Systems research, genetic algorithms and information systems , 2000 .

[22]  Patricia Paderewski,et al.  A Software System evolutionary and adaptive framework: application to Agent-based systems , 2004, J. Syst. Archit..

[23]  V. Rajkovic.  Evolutionary information systems: John HAWGOOD (Eds) Proceedings of the IFIP TC 8 Working Conference on Evolutionary Information Systems, Budapest, Hungary, 1–3 September 1981, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, x + 272 pages, Dfl1. 75. 00 , 1982 .

[24]  John H. Holland,et al.  Emergence. , 1997, Philosophica.

[25]  J. Mingers,et al.  Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis , 1996 .

[26]  M. Heidegger.  The question concerning technology , 2024, East Asian Journal of Philosophy.

[27]  Chris Langton,et al.  Artificial Life , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[28]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[29]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[30]  Robert B. Johnston,et al.  Situated Action, Stucturation and Actor-Network Theory: An Integrative Theoretical Perspective , 2001, ECIS.

[31]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Formulation of Design Theories for Information Systems , 2004 .

[33]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Concepts and experiments in computational reflection , 1987, OOPSLA '87.

[34]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[35]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[36]  Arvid Aulin,et al.  Foundations of Mathematical System Dynamics: The Fundamental Theory of Causal Recursion and Its Application to Social Science and Economics , 1989 .

[37]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Peter Wegner,et al.  New Models of Computation , 2004, Comput. J..

[39]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[40]  Meir M. Lehman,et al.  Program evolution: processes of software change , 1985 .

[41]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Leandro Nunes de Castro,et al.  From Biologically Inspired Computing to Natural Computing , 2005 .

[43]  David Lorge Parnas.  Software aspects of strategic defense systems , 1985, SOEN.

[44]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[45]  Henry Lieberman,et al.  Out of context: Computer systems that adapt to, and learn from, context , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[46]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[47]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[48]  E. F. CODD,et al.  A relational model of data for large shared data banks , 1970, CACM.

[49]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory , 1991 .

[50]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Growing systems in emergent organizations , 1999, CACM.

[51]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[52]  Wita Wojtkowski,et al.  Constructing the Infrastructure for the Knowledge Economy: Methods and Tools, Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[53]  Thomas Erickson,et al.  Some problems with the notion of context-aware computing , 2002, CACM.

[54]  E. F. Codd.  Relational database: a practical foundation for productivity , 2007 .

[55]  Peter Wegner,et al.  Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms , 1997, CACM.