Impact of RNA degradation on gene expression profiling

BackgroundGene expression profiling is a highly sensitive technique which is used for profiling tumor samples for medical prognosis. RNA quality and degradation influence the analysis results of gene expression profiles. The impact of this influence on the profiles and its medical impact is not fully understood. As patient samples are very valuable for clinical studies, it is necessary to establish criteria for the RNA quality to be able to use these samples in later analysis.MethodsTo investigate the effects of RNA integrity on gene expression profiling, whole genome expression arrays were used. We used tumor biopsies from patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. To simulate degradation, the isolated total RNA of all patients was subjected to heat-induced degradation in a time-dependent manner. Expression profiling was then performed and data were analyzed bioinformatically to assess the differences.ResultsThe differences introduced by RNA degradation were largely outweighed by the biological differences between the patients. Only a relatively small number of probes (275 out of 41,000) show a significant effect due to degradation. The genes that show the strongest effect due to RNA degradation were, especially, those with short mRNAs and probe positions near the 5' end.ConclusionsDegraded RNA from tumor samples (RIN > 5) can still be used to perform gene expression analysis. A much higher biological variance between patients is observed compared to the effect that is imposed by degradation of RNA. Nevertheless there are genes, very short ones and those with the probe binding side close to the 5' end that should be excluded from gene expression analysis when working with degraded RNA. These results are limited to the Agilent 44 k microarray platform and should be carefully interpreted when transferring to other settings.

[1]  D. Kennell,et al.  Evidence that the 5' end of lac mRNA starts to decay as soon as it is synthesized , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Thomas Ragg,et al.  The RIN: an RNA integrity number for assigning integrity values to RNA measurements , 2006, BMC Molecular Biology.

[3]  Haiwei Song,et al.  The enzymes and control of eukaryotic mRNA turnover , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[4]  Tatiana Popova,et al.  Effect of RNA quality on transcript intensity levels in microarray analysis of human post-mortem brain tissues , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[5]  Gallya Gannot,et al.  Evaluation of non-formalin tissue fixation for molecular profiling studies. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  R. Simon,et al.  Aneuploidy-dependent massive deregulation of the cellular transcriptome and apparent divergence of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in human rectal carcinomas. , 2006, Cancer research.

[7]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[8]  Karl Kornacker,et al.  Chipping away at the chip bias: RNA degradation in microarray analysis , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[9]  D. Tollervey,et al.  The Many Pathways of RNA Degradation , 2009, Cell.

[10]  T. Speed,et al.  GOstat: find statistically overrepresented Gene Ontologies within a group of genes. , 2004, Bioinformatics.

[11]  P. S. Pine,et al.  Characterization of the effect of sample quality on high density oligonucleotide microarray data using progressively degraded rat liver RNA , 2007, BMC biotechnology.

[12]  Donna Neuberg,et al.  Comparison of frozen and RNALater solid tissue storage methods for use in RNA expression microarrays , 2004, BMC Genomics.

[13]  Jean YH Yang,et al.  Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics , 2004, Genome Biology.

[14]  R. Simon,et al.  Effectiveness of gene expression profiling for response prediction of rectal adenocarcinomas to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  D. Cimino,et al.  Quantitative expression profiling of highly degraded RNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumor biopsies by oligonucleotide microarrays , 2008, Laboratory Investigation.

[16]  Qihua Tan,et al.  RNA quality and gene expression analysis of ovarian tumor tissue undergoing repeated thaw-freezing. , 2007, Experimental and molecular pathology.

[17]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure , 2006, Bioinform..

[18]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[19]  H. Putzer,et al.  Structural insights into the dual activity of RNase J , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[20]  David A Jones,et al.  Preservation of RNA for Functional Genomic Studies: A Multidisciplinary Tumor Bank Protocol , 2001, Modern Pathology.

[21]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[22]  M. Fernö,et al.  An improved genetic system for detection and analysis of protein nuclear import signals. , 2007 .

[23]  O. Pellegrini,et al.  5′-to-3′ Exoribonuclease Activity in Bacteria: Role of RNase J1 in rRNA Maturation and 5′ Stability of mRNA , 2007, Cell.

[24]  A. Moorman,et al.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  Gordon K Smyth,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology Linear Models and Empirical Bayes Methods for Assessing Differential Expression in Microarray Experiments , 2011 .