Comparison of Rates of Union and Hardware Removal Between Large and Small Cannulated Screws for Calcaneal Osteotomy

Background: The calcaneal osteotomy is a common procedure to correct hindfoot malalignment. Reported union rates are high, utilizing fixation methods including staples, plates, and most commonly cannulated screws. We began our practice using 6.5 mm and 7.3 mm cannulated screws, but complaints of postoperative posterior heel pain led to hardware removal in many patients. A switch to smaller 4.5 mm cannulated screws resulted in fewer symptoms, thus we hypothesized that using a smaller screw would decrease screw removal while maintaining an equally high union rate. Methods: The records of patients who underwent a calcaneal osteotomy by 2 surgeons between January 1996 and April 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. The rates of hardware removal and union were compared between osteotomies held with two 7.3 mm, 6.5 mm, and 4.5 mm cannulated screws. Results: There were 272 feet that met the inclusion criteria. The hardware removal rate for 130 osteotomies held with two 7.3 mm screws was 29.2% and the removal rate for 115 osteotomies held with 4.5 mm screws was 13.0%, which was significantly different (P < .05). The removal rate for 27 osteotomies with 6.5 mm screws was 33.3%. The union rate for all groups was 100%. Conclusion: Fixation of calcaneal osteotomies with two 4.5 mm screws is advantageous over larger screws with respect to future hardware removal. There was no loss of position from the smaller screws and we feel that the 4.5mm cannulated screw provides sufficient compression and achieves a high rate of union equal to that of the larger screws. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

[1]  A. Guha,et al.  Comparison of Three Different Fixation Methods of Calcaneal Osteotomies , 2013, Foot & ankle international.

[2]  M. Oddy,et al.  Mechanical Stability of a Locked Step-Plate versus Single Compression Screw Fixation for Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy , 2012, Foot & ankle international.

[3]  A. Guha,et al.  Calcaneal osteotomy in the treatment of adult acquired flatfoot deformity. , 2012, Foot and ankle clinics.

[4]  T. Roukis,et al.  Incidence of nonunion of the unfixated, isolated evans calcaneal osteotomy: a systematic review. , 2012, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[5]  L. Didomenico,et al.  Treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction without flexor digitorum tendon transfer: a retrospective study of 34 patients. , 2011, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[6]  A. Catanzariti,et al.  A retrospective analysis of anterior calcaneal osteotomy with allogenic bone graft. , 2010, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[7]  Patrick M Bolt,et al.  A Comparison of Lateral Column Lengthening and Medial Translational Osteotomy of the Calcaneus for the Reconstruction of Adult Acquired Flatfoot , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[8]  D. S. Malay,et al.  A compression force comparison study among three staple fixation systems. , 2007, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[9]  L. Schon,et al.  Treatment of Stage II Posterior Tibial Tendon Deficiency With Flexor Digitorum Longus Tendon Transfer and Calcaneal Osteotomy , 2004, Foot & ankle international.

[10]  J. Wacker,et al.  Calcaneal osteotomy and transfer of the tendon of flexor digitorum longus for stage-II dysfunction of tibialis posterior. Three- to five-year results. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  S. Weinfeld Medial slide calcaneal osteotomy. Technique, patient selection, and results. , 2001, Foot and ankle clinics.

[12]  E. Koutsogiannis Treatment of mobile flat foot by displacement osteotomy of the calcaneus. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.