Slope-driven goal location behavior in pigeons.

A basic tenet of principles of associative learning applicable to models of spatial learning is that a cue should be assigned greater weight if it is a better predictor of the goal location. Pigeons were trained to locate a goal in an acute corner of an isosceles trapezoid arena, presented on a slanted floor with 3 (Experiment 1) or 2 (Experiment 2) orientations. The goal could be consistently determined by the geometric shape of the arena; however, its position with respect to the slope gradient varied, such that slope position was not a good predictor of the goal. Pigeons learned to solve the task, and testing on a flat surface revealed successful encoding of the goal relative to the geometric shape of the arena. However, when tested in the arena placed in a novel orientation on the slope, pigeons surprisingly made systematic errors to the other acute-but geometrically incorrect-mirror image corner. The results indicate that, for each arena orientation, pigeons encoded the goal location with respect to the slope. Then, in the novel orientation, they chose the corner that matched the goal's position on the slope plus local cue (corner angle). Although geometry was 2 times (Experiment 2) or even 3 times (Experiment 1) as predictive as slope, it failed to control behavior during novel test trials. Instead, searching was driven by the less predictive slope cues. The reliance on slope and the unresponsiveness to geometry are explained by the greater salience of slope despite its lower predictive value.

[1]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  永福 智志 The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Hippocampal formation is required for geometric navigation in pigeons , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Inhibition within a reference frame during the interpretation of spatial language , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  M L Spetch,et al.  Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[6]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[8]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Explaining the Development of Spatial Reorientation , 2007 .

[9]  R. Morse The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees , 1994 .

[10]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  The effect of proximity on landmark use in Clark's nutcrackers , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Ryan D Ward,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Animal Behavior Processes Conditional Stimulus Informativeness Governs Conditioned Stimulus — Unconditioned Stimulus Associability , 2012 .

[12]  M A Good,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on the shape of the environment. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Lucia F Jacobs,et al.  Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function. , 2003, Psychological review.

[14]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Cognition, Perception, and Language , 1997 .

[15]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[16]  D. Nardi,et al.  Asymmetrical participation of the left and right hippocampus for representing environmental geometry in homing pigeons , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Animals' use of landmarks and metric information to reorient: effects of the size of the experimental space , 2005, Cognition.

[18]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[19]  Marcia L Spetch,et al.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: I. Do adults encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[20]  J. Pearce A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. , 1987, Psychological review.

[21]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  The influence of landmark salience in a navigation task: an additive effect between its components. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  C Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Luca Tommasi,et al.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[24]  Pete R. Jones,et al.  Development of Cue Integration in Human Navigation , 2008, Current Biology.

[25]  Daniele Nardi,et al.  Slope-based encoding of a goal location is unaffected by hippocampal lesions in homing pigeons (Columba livia) , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .

[27]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons encode relative geometry. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Searching Imagined Environments , 1990 .

[29]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Dissecting the Geometric Module , 2006, Psychological science.

[31]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[32]  J. Pearce,et al.  Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[33]  J. Spencer,et al.  The Emerging Spatial Mind , 2007 .

[34]  A. Bennett,et al.  Spatial memory in a food storing corvid , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Is language necessary for human spatial reorientation? Reconsidering evidence from dual task paradigms , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[37]  Marcia L Spetch,et al.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: II. Do pigeons (Columba livia) encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[38]  J Bures,et al.  Place navigation in rats guided by a vestibular and kinesthetic orienting gradient. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.

[39]  Hanspeter A Mallot,et al.  Geographical Slant Facilitates Navigation and Orientation in Virtual Environments , 2004, Perception.

[40]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[41]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Development of spatial cognition. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[42]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images II: view-based navigation in nonrectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[43]  D. McNamara,et al.  Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society , 2007 .

[44]  W. Gerstner,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model. , 2009, Psychological review.

[45]  N. Newcombe,et al.  A Matter of Trust: When Landmarks and Geometry Are Used During Reorientation , 2007 .

[46]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[47]  Marie-Claude Grobéty,et al.  Spatial learning in a three-dimensional maze , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[49]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[50]  Daniele Nardi,et al.  Pigeon (Columba livia) encoding of a goal location: the relative importance of shape geometry and slope information. , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.

[51]  J Bures,et al.  Vestibular navigation directed by the slope of terrain. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  T. Collett,et al.  The use of visual landmarks by honeybees: Bees weight landmarks according to their distance from the goal , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[53]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[54]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[56]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[57]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: The role of proximity to the goal , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[58]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Reorientation by geometric and landmark information in environments of different size. , 2005, Developmental science.