Inverse Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Concepts Using Reversed Equivalent-Area Targets

A promising path for developing a low-boom configuration is a multifidelity approach that starts from a low-fidelity low-boom design, refines the low-fidelity design with computational fluid dynamics equivalent-area analysis, and improves the design with sonic-boom analysis by using computational fluid dynamics off-body pressure distributions. The focus of this paper is on the third step of this approach, in which the design is improved with sonic-boom analysis through the use of computational fluid dynamics calculations. A new inverse design process for off-body pressure tailoring is formulated and demonstrated with a low-boom supersonic configuration that was developed by using the mixed-fidelity design method with computational fluid dynamics equivalent-area analysis. The new inverse design process uses the reverse propagation of the pressure distribution from a mid-field location to a near-field location, converts the near-field into an equivalent-area distribution, generates a low-boom target for the...

[1]  Mathias Wintzer,et al.  Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets , 2008 .

[2]  James W. Fenbert,et al.  Conceptual Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft with Flight Trim Requirement , 2014 .

[3]  Quang Dinh,et al.  Automatic shape optimization using parametric CAD applied to sonic boom reduction , 2007 .

[4]  James W. Fenbert,et al.  Conceptual Design of Low-Boom Aircraft with Flight Trim Requirement , 2015 .

[5]  Olivier Soucy,et al.  SONIC BOOM REDUCTION VIA REMOTE INVERSE ADJOINT APPROACH , 2007 .

[6]  Wu Li,et al.  Approximation of Off-Body Sonic-Boom Analysis for Low-Boom Conceptual Design , 2016 .

[7]  Wu Li,et al.  A Mixed-Fidelity Approach for Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft * , 2010 .

[8]  Wu Li,et al.  Integration of Off-Track Sonic Boom Analysis in Conceptual Design of Supersonic Aircraft , 2011 .

[9]  M. Nemec,et al.  Parallel Adjoint Framework for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Component-Based Geometry , 2011 .

[10]  S. Obayashi,et al.  Numerical Investigation on Sonic Boom Reduction with Non-Axisymmetric Body Shapes , 2008 .

[11]  Kenneth Plotkin,et al.  Review of sonic boom theory , 1989 .

[12]  Brian Argrow,et al.  SONIC BOOM MINIMIZATION REVISITED , 1998 .

[13]  M. Berger,et al.  Robust and efficient Cartesian mesh generation for component-based geometry , 1998 .

[14]  Wu Li,et al.  Interactive Inverse Design Optimization of Fuselage Shape for Low-Boom Supersonic Concepts , 2008 .

[15]  Sergey Chernyshev,et al.  Sonic Boom Minimization and Atmospheric Effects , 2008 .

[16]  Sriram K. Rallabhandi,et al.  Advanced Sonic Boom Prediction Using the Augmented Burgers Equation , 2011 .

[17]  Wu Li,et al.  Generation of Parametric Equivalent-Area Targets for Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Concepts , 2011 .