Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition Why Is Information Displaced from Visual Working Memory during Visual Search?

Research has shown that performing visual search while maintaining representations in visual working memory displaces up to one object's worth of information from memory. This memory displacement has previously been attributed to a nonspecific disruption of the memory representation by the mere presentation of the visual search array, and the goal of the present study was to determine whether it instead reflects the use of visual working memory in the actual search process. The first hypothesis tested was that working memory displacement occurs because observers preemptively discard about an object's worth of information from visual working memory in anticipation of performing visual search. Second, we tested the hypothesis that on target absent trials no information is displaced from visual working memory because no target is entered into memory when search is completed. Finally, we tested whether visual working memory displacement is due to the need to select a response to the search array. The findings rule out these alternative explanations. The present study supports the hypothesis that change-detection performance is impaired when a search array appears during the retention interval due to nonspecific disruption or masking.

[1]  G. Logan Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. , 1978 .

[2]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[3]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[4]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  R. Dell’Acqua,et al.  The Demonstration of Short-Term Consolidation , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  G. Logan,et al.  Attention and automaticity: Toward a theoretical integration , 1999 .

[7]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Essence of statistics, 2nd ed. , 1988 .

[8]  Joo-Seok Hyun,et al.  Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation. , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[11]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[14]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Exploring the suffix effect in serial visuospatial short-term memory , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[17]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  How Much Memory Does Oculomotor Search Have? , 2003, Psychological science.

[18]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Attention in Character-Classification Tasks : Evidence for the Automaticity of Component Stages , 1978 .

[19]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual Search Remains Efficient when Visual Working Memory is Full , 2001, Psychological science.

[20]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The role of working memory representations in the control of attention. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  J G Quinn,et al.  Irrelevant Pictures in Visual Working Memory , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[26]  R. Logie,et al.  Visuo-spatial working memory: Visual, spatial, or central executive? , 1991 .

[27]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  G. Loftus Essence Of Statistics , 1982 .