Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses

[1]  T. Chalmers,et al.  Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  C. Mulrow.  The medical review article: state of the science. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[4]  L. Stewart,et al.  Practical methodology of meta-analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data. Cochrane Working Group. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  H S Sacks,et al.  Meta-analysis: an update. , 1996, The Mount Sinai journal of medicine, New York.

[6]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[7]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta‐analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 2000, Revista espanola de salud publica.

[8]  M. Dorgan,et al.  Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Replication validity of genetic association studies , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. , 2001, BMJ.

[12]  A. Jadad,et al.  Examining the Evidence in Anesthesia Literature: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Their Methodologies , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  D. Moher,et al.  The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Grace Huang,et al.  Aspirin as an Adjunct to Screening for Prevention of Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned. , 2002, JAMA.

[17]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  David Moher,et al.  The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[19]  D. Rennie,et al.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[21]  D. Richards.  The quality of systematic reviews in dentistry , 2004, Evidence-Based Dentistry.

[22]  John Hoey,et al.  Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. , 2004, JAMA.

[24]  Peter Fonagy,et al.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data , 2004, The Lancet.

[25]  Karen Golden-Biddle,et al.  Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[26]  Richard Horton,et al.  Putting clinical trials into context , 2005, The Lancet.

[27]  Anthony Delaney,et al.  A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature , 2005, Critical care.

[28]  Alessandro Liberati,et al.  Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Evidence Concerning the Consequences of Publication and Related Biases , 2006 .

[30]  E. Romagnoli,et al.  Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Publication Bias: Recognizing the Problem, Understanding Its Origins and Scope, and Preventing Harm , 2006 .

[32]  I. Olkin,et al.  The case of the misleading funnel plot , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  F. McAlister,et al.  Acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a case study of the pitfalls in the evolution of evidence. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[34]  Michael K Gould,et al.  An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[35]  M. Weyden.  The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2006 .

[36]  Alexander Tsertsvadze,et al.  Systematic reviews: when is an update an update? , 2006, The Lancet.

[37]  M. Borenstein,et al.  Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments , 2006 .

[38]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[39]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments , 2007, Psychometrika.

[40]  David Moher,et al.  Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[41]  J. Tilburt,et al.  Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  J. Pérez Martín.  [International Committee of Medical Journal Editors]. , 2008, Revista alergia Mexico.

[43]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[45]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  Michele Tarsilla.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.