During the restoration of the Duomo di Milano main spire, a monitoring system has been set up in order to have an early detection of potential risks of the spire. A scaffolding for the restoration activities was mounted around the spire, and it had a section exposed to the wind actions much wider than the spire itself. Any possible contact between the spire and the scaffolding had to be prevented, even under the strongest winds expected in Milan, since the stability of the extremely slender marble spire could be compromised in case of contact. A safety gap between the two substructures was granted during the construction phase; however, the deflection of the spire could not be reliably predicted by numerical models. Therefore, it was decided to continuously monitor the actual gap value, together with other measurements, helping in a thorough understanding of the spire and scaffolding movements. The gap monitoring was measured by three-wire potentiometers, mounted to measure the relative position between the scaffolding and the spire in the section where the gap was the narrowest: the top balcony. This measurement was considered one of the most critical for the safety of the spire; therefore, every choice has been aimed at redundancy and safety. Moreover, any systematic effect has to be compensated for. A main issue related to the use of wire potentiometers is that these sensors estimate the amplitude of the displacement but does not provide any information on its direction. Since the horizontal displacement of slender structures can be in any direction, according to the wind and sun radiation conditions, the output of a wire potentiometer is also affected by displacements in the direction normal to its sensitivity axis, leading to a systematic effect in the measurements (cross-talk effect). This aspect hardly finds literature attention, but it can play a major role if the safety of the structure is monitored with wire potentiometers. This paper focuses on the estimation and compensation of this cross-talk effect, to provide reliable measurements in the monitoring of slender structures. Numerical and experimental validation of the proposed approach demonstrates the need to compensate for the cross-talk effects for a proper uncertainty estimation and then the validity of the proposed method.
[1]
I. Lombillo,et al.
Structural health monitoring of a damaged church: design of an integrated platform of electronic instrumentation, data acquisition and client/server software
,
2016
.
[2]
Rosario Ceravolo,et al.
Vibration-Based Monitoring and Diagnosis of Cultural Heritage: A Methodological Discussion in Three Examples
,
2016
.
[3]
Gabriele Comanducci,et al.
Earthquake-Induced Damage Detection in a Monumental Masonry Bell-Tower Using Long-Term Dynamic Monitoring Data
,
2018
.
[4]
Rajiv Tiwari,et al.
Rotor Systems: Analysis and Identification
,
2017
.
[5]
Lorenzo Comolli,et al.
Thermal characterization of FBG strain gauges for the monitoring of the cupola of Duomo di Milano
,
2011,
International Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors.
[6]
Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.
Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies
,
2007
.
[7]
A. Cigada,et al.
Structural Health Monitoring of an Historical Building: The Main Spire of the Duomo Di Milano
,
2017
.
[8]
Alessandro De Stefano,et al.
Structural health monitoring of historical heritage in Italy: some relevant experiences
,
2016
.
[9]
Roberto Meli,et al.
Structural Monitoring of the Mexico City Cathedral (1990–2014)
,
2015
.
[10]
Alan J. Laub.
Computational Matrix Analysis
,
2012
.
[11]
Gianni Bartoli,et al.
Dynamic identification of historic masonry towers through an expeditious and no-contact approach: Application to the “Torre del Mangia” in Siena (Italy)
,
2014
.
[12]
Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al.
Earthquakes and ancient leaning towers: Geodetic monitoring of the bell tower of San Benedetto Church in Ferrara (Italy)
,
2014
.