Structural behaviour of masonry walls stregthened with mortar layers reinforced with FRP grids

The seismic events recently occurred all over the world and, in particular, in Europe have shown the high vulnerability of particular classes of buildings against the horizontal actions. The damage of structural masonry walls is one of the most widespread harming injuries and cause of loss of serviceability and seismic capacity for a building. The damage experienced by these masonry elements has brought to light the necessity to strengthen them with appropriate reinforcing systems in order to achieve an upgrading to the necessary seismic and energy dissipation capacity. Different strengthening systems have been proposed and studied during the last decades, with particular reference to the type of materials, system configuration with respect to the element to be strengthened, difficulties in the application and effectiveness of the reinforcement. Even though in the last years different studies have been carried out in this field, many issues regarding the methods for the evaluation of the actual behaviour of these techniques, and their effectiveness in the improvement of seismic behaviour of structural members to which they are applied, are still open. In the present study the structural behaviour of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened with composite grid reinforced mortar layers is studied. The characterization of the reinforcing system and the assessment of the overall increase of capacity of the strengthened masonry walls is performed. First of all, the study is focused on the investigation of the mechanical characteristics of the strengthening system in itself. In fact, the structural behaviour of an externally applied strengthening system for masonry walls is examined. The reinforcing technique considered in the present research is composed by mortar layers incorporating a FRP reinforcement in form of grid. The FRP reinforced mortar layers are externally applied to the wall surfaces in a symmetric fashion, and can also be connected to the wall by means of an adequate connection system. The mechanical behaviour of the reinforced mortar under tensile, compression and shear loading is assessed through laboratory tests and constitutive laws can be proposed to characterize the reinforced mortar mechanical behaviour. The experimental characterization of the presented system is followed by and validated through numerical modelling and simulation of its mechanical behaviour. In a second phase, the behaviour of masonry walls strengthened by means of the considered technique is studied. The in-plane shear behaviour is considered, in case of cyclic loading state. The performances of the global strengthened assemblage is thus examined with both experimental and numerical investigation criteria. Also, the overall ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the system, while subjected to horizontal in-plane actions, is studied. The actual mechanical behaviour of the proposed structural solution is investigated through an experimental program with prototypes. Furthermore, a finite element model is realized in order to replicate the structural features of the strengthened masonry wall. The finite element model can be also used for further validation of the panels performances.

[1]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Anisotropic Softening Model for Masonry Plates and Shells , 2000 .

[2]  A. Prota,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF IN-PLANE BEHAVIOR OF TUFF MASONRY STRENGTHENED WITH CEMENTITIOUS MATRIX-GRID COMPOSITES , 2007 .

[3]  R. Borst,et al.  Studies in anisotropic plasticity with reference to the Hill criterion , 1990 .

[4]  Tarek H. Almusallam,et al.  Load Capacity of Concrete Masonry Block Walls Strengthened with Epoxy-bonded GFRP Sheets , 2005 .

[5]  T. Stratford,et al.  Shear Strengthening Masonry Panels with Sheet Glass-Fiber Reinforced Polymer , 2004 .

[6]  O. Hoffman The Brittle Strength of Orthotropic Materials , 1967 .

[7]  R. Hill A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  Pierino Lestuzzi,et al.  In-Plane Seismic Response of URM Walls Upgraded with FRP , 2005 .

[9]  P. Lourenço,et al.  Multisurface Interface Model for Analysis of Masonry Structures , 1997 .

[10]  B. Luccioni,et al.  In-plane retrofitting of masonry panels with fibre reinforced composite materials , 2011 .

[11]  C. Modena,et al.  Shear behavior of masonry panels strengthened by FRP laminates , 2002 .

[12]  H. W. Reinhardt,et al.  Experimental determination of crack softening characteristics of normalweight and lightweight concrete , 1986 .

[13]  Thanasis C. Triantafillou,et al.  Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading , 2008 .

[14]  T. Triantafillou,et al.  Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading , 2007 .

[15]  E. Sacco,et al.  Bond behaviour of CFRP laminates glued on clay bricks: Experimental and numerical study , 2011 .

[16]  Y. Zhang,et al.  SEISMIC SHEAR CAPACITY OF BRICK MASONRY WALL REINFORCED BY GFRP , 2006 .

[17]  Pablo Alcaino,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL RESPONSE OF MASONRY WALLS EXTERNALLY REINFORCED WITH CARBON FIBER FABRICS , 2006 .

[18]  D. Hordijk Local approach to fatigue of concrete , 1991 .

[19]  Elio Sacco,et al.  A nonlinear homogenization procedure for periodic masonry , 2009 .

[20]  A. Anthoine HOMOGENIZATION OF PERIODIC MASONRY: PLANE STRESS, GENERALIZED PLANE STRAIN OR 3D MODELLING? , 1997 .

[21]  Paulo B. Lourenço Current experimental and numerical issues in masonry research , 2004 .

[22]  P Famigliuolo,et al.  Prestazioni sismiche di edifici in muratura: impiego di un modello “concrete” modificato e analisi di confronto , 2009 .

[23]  A. Prota,et al.  Nonlinear Analyses of Tuff Masonry Walls Strengthened with Cementitious Matrix-Grid Composites , 2009 .

[24]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Homogenisation Approaches for Structural Analysis of Masonry Buildings , 2006 .

[25]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Strengthening of historic masonry structures with composite materials , 1997 .

[26]  P. Roca,et al.  Shear response of brick masonry small assemblages strengthened with bonded FRP laminates for in-plane reinforcement , 2010 .

[27]  A. Prota,et al.  In-plane shear performance of masonry panels strengthened with FRP , 2007 .

[28]  P. Lestuzzi,et al.  STATIC CYCLIC RESPONSE OF MASONRY WALLS RETROFITTED WITH FIBER-REINFORCED POLYMERS , 2007 .

[29]  R. Borst,et al.  The use of the Hoffman yield criterion in finite element analysis of anisotropic composites , 1990 .

[30]  T. Triantafillou Strengthening of Masonry Structures Using Epoxy-Bonded FRP Laminates , 1998 .

[31]  J. Morris,et al.  Discrete Element Modeling , 2007 .

[32]  Y. R. Rashid,et al.  Ultimate strength analysis of prestressed concrete pressure vessels , 1968 .

[33]  Hamid Saadatmanesh,et al.  Fiber Composites for New and Existing Structures , 1994 .

[34]  J. Blaauwendraad,et al.  Crack Models for Concrete, Discrete or Smeared? Fixed, Multi-Directional or Rotating? , 1989 .

[35]  A. Prota,et al.  Experimental In-Plane Behavior of Tuff Masonry Strengthened with Cementitious Matrix–Grid Composites , 2006 .

[36]  T. Triantafillou,et al.  Externally bonded grids as strengthening and seismic retrofitting materials of masonry panels , 2011 .

[37]  E. Jacquelin,et al.  Modelling approaches of the in-plane shear behaviour of unreinforced and FRP strengthened masonry panels , 2006 .

[38]  Thanasis Triantafillou,et al.  Composites: a new possibility for the shear strengthening of concrete, masonry and wood , 1998 .

[39]  Ciro Faella,et al.  Shear capacity of masonry walls externally strengthened by a cement-based composite material: An experimental campaign , 2010 .

[40]  Pierino Lestuzzi,et al.  A REVIEW OF CONVENTIONAL SEISMIC RETROFITTING TECHNIQUES FOR URM , 2004 .

[41]  Maria Antonietta Aiello,et al.  Bond analysis of masonry structures strengthened with CFRP sheets , 2006 .

[42]  M. Griffith,et al.  Bond behaviour of FRP-to-clay brick masonry joints , 2009 .

[43]  A. Al-Saidy,et al.  SHEAR BEHAVIOR OF URM RETROFITTED WITH FRP OVERLAYS , 1997 .

[44]  B. Mobasher,et al.  Cement-Based Matrix-Grid System for Masonry Rehabilitation , 2007, SP-244: Thin Fiber and Textile Reinforced Cementitious Systems.

[45]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Interface Model Applied to Fracture of Masonry Structures , 1994 .

[46]  P. Trovalusci,et al.  Limit Analysis for No-Tension and Frictional Three-Dimensional Discrete Systems* , 1998 .

[47]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials , 1971 .

[48]  J. Blaauwendraad Realisations and Restrictions: Application of Numerical Models to Concrete Structures , 1986 .

[49]  Mervyn J. Kowalsky,et al.  In-Plane Testing of Damaged Masonry Wall Repaired with FRP , 2002 .

[50]  ANALYSIS OF MASONRY STRUCTURES WITH INTERFACE ELEMENTS , 2003 .