Assessment of Solvated Interaction Energy Function for Ranking Antibody-Antigen Binding Affinities

Affinity modulation of antibodies and antibody fragments of therapeutic value is often required in order to improve their clinical efficacies. Virtual affinity maturation has the potential to quickly focus on the critical hotspot residues without the combinatorial explosion problem of conventional display and library approaches. However, this requires a binding affinity scoring function that is capable of ranking single-point mutations of a starting antibody. We focus here on assessing the solvated interaction energy (SIE) function that was originally developed for and is widely applied to scoring of protein-ligand binding affinities. To this end, we assembled a structure-function data set called Single-Point Mutant Antibody Binding (SiPMAB) comprising several antibody-antigen systems suitable for this assessment, i.e., based on high-resolution crystal structures for the parent antibodies and coupled with high-quality binding affinity measurements for sets of single-point antibody mutants in each system. Using this data set, we tested the SIE function with several mutation protocols based on the popular methods SCWRL, Rosetta, and FoldX. We found that the SIE function coupled with a protocol limited to sampling only the mutated side chain can reasonably predict relative binding affinities with a Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient of about 0.6, outperforming more aggressive sampling protocols. Importantly, this performance is maintained for each of the seven system-specific component subsets as well as for other relevant subsets including non-alanine and charge-altering mutations. The transferability and enrichment in affinity-improving mutants can be further enhanced using consensus ranking over multiple methods, including the SIE, Talaris, and FOLDEF energy functions. The knowledge gained from this study can lead to successful prospective applications of virtual affinity maturation.

[1]  John A. Robinson,et al.  Analysis of Antibody A6 Binding to the Extracellular Interferon γ Receptor α-Chain by Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis and Random Mutagenesis with Phage Display† , 2000 .

[2]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[3]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Boosting Virtual Screening Enrichments with Data Fusion: Coalescing Hits from Two-Dimensional Fingerprints, Shape, and Docking , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  Antibodies to watch in 2015 , 2015, mAbs.

[5]  Heyue Zhou,et al.  Recombinant antibody libraries and selection technologies. , 2011, New biotechnology.

[6]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[7]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. D. de Vos,et al.  VEGF and the Fab fragment of a humanized neutralizing antibody: crystal structure of the complex at 2.4 A resolution and mutational analysis of the interface. , 1998, Structure.

[9]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  James R. Apgar,et al.  AB‐Bind: Antibody binding mutational database for computational affinity predictions , 2016, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  William R. Strohl,et al.  Therapeutic antibody engineering , 2012 .

[12]  Paul J Conroy,et al.  A tale of two specificities: bispecific antibodies for therapeutic and diagnostic applications , 2013, Trends in Biotechnology.

[13]  Harpreet Kaur Saini,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE Structural bioinformatics Meta-DP: domain prediction meta-server , 2022 .

[14]  B. Teicher,et al.  Antibody Conjugate Therapeutics: Challenges and Potential , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  J. Kirsch,et al.  Energetic analysis of an antigen/antibody interface: Alanine scanning mutagenesis and double mutant cycles on the hyhel‐10/lysozyme interaction , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  Imran Siddiqi,et al.  Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities, 1. Exploring the Parameter Space , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[17]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 Scoring Exercise , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  M. Little,et al.  Of mice and men: hybridoma and recombinant antibodies. , 2000, Immunology today.

[19]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Hervé Minoux,et al.  Engineering Protein Therapeutics: Predictive Performances of a Structure-Based Virtual Affinity Maturation Protocol , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Exhaustive search and solvated interaction energy (SIE) for virtual screening and affinity prediction , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[22]  G. Klebe,et al.  Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  Jinquan Luo,et al.  Leveraging SBDD in protein therapeutic development: antibody engineering. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[24]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  Metrics for antibody therapeutics development , 2010, mAbs.

[25]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  Monoclonal antibody successes in the clinic , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Janice M Reichert,et al.  The future of antibodies as cancer drugs. , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[27]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Exhaustive docking and solvated interaction energy scoring: lessons learned from the SAMPL4 challenge , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[28]  R. Kelley,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of an antibody functional epitope. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[29]  Kouhei Tsumoto,et al.  Contribution of Asparagine Residues to the Stabilization of a Proteinaceous Antigen-Antibody Complex, HyHEL-10-Hen Egg White Lysozyme* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  proteins STRUCTURE O FUNCTION O BIOINFORMATICS Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4 , 2022 .

[31]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Evaluation of the Wilma-SIE Virtual Screening Method in Community Structure-Activity Resource 2013 and 2014 Blind Challenges , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  E. Goldman,et al.  A mutational analysis of the binding of two different proteins to the same antibody. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[33]  Yili Li,et al.  Dissection of binding interactions in the complex between the anti-lysozyme antibody HyHEL-63 and its antigen. , 2003 .

[34]  B. Braden,et al.  Estimation of the hydrophobic effect in an antigen-antibody protein-protein interface. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[35]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[36]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[37]  Julie C. Mitchell,et al.  Community‐wide evaluation of methods for predicting the effect of mutations on protein–protein interactions , 2013, Proteins.

[38]  E. Boder,et al.  Engineering antibodies by yeast display. , 2012, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[39]  Kouhei Tsumoto,et al.  The Role of Hydrogen Bonding via Interfacial Water Molecules in Antigen-Antibody Complexation , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[41]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  An Extensive Test of 14 Scoring Functions Using the PDBbind Refined Set of 800 Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[42]  M. Murcko,et al.  Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[43]  C. Hammers,et al.  Antibody phage display: technique and applications. , 2014, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[44]  Traian Sulea,et al.  The solvated interaction energy method for scoring binding affinities. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[45]  K Watanabe,et al.  Role of Tyr Residues in the Contact Region of Anti-lysozyme Monoclonal Antibody HyHEL10 for Antigen Binding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[46]  Arne Elofsson,et al.  3D-Jury: A Simple Approach to Improve Protein Structure Predictions , 2003, Bioinform..

[47]  L. Serrano,et al.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  J. Reichert,et al.  Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[49]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[50]  Kyle A. Barlow,et al.  A Web Resource for Standardized Benchmark Datasets, Metrics, and Rosetta Protocols for Macromolecular Modeling and Design , 2015, PloS one.

[51]  E. Goldman,et al.  A mutational analysis of binding interactions in an antigen-antibody protein-protein complex. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[52]  Marwen Naïm,et al.  Molecular dynamics-solvated interaction energy studies of protein-protein interactions: the MP1-p14 scaffolding complex. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.