The optimum is not enough: A near-optimal solution paradigm for energy systems synthesis

An optimisation-based decision support methodology is presented for the synthesis of energy supply systems on the conceptual level. Previous work in this field has tended to focus on the generation of the single optimal solution. However, given that mathematical models never perfectly represent the real world and that planners are often not aware of all practical constraints, the mathematically optimal solution usually only approximates the real-world optimum, and thus has only limited significance. The presented approach therefore exploits the near-optimal solution space for more rational synthesis decisions. For this purpose, integer-cut constraints are employed to systematically generate a set of near-optimal solutions alongside the optimal solution. In place of the traditional analysis of the single optimal solution, we analyse the generated solution set to identify common features (the “must-haves”) and differences (the “real choices”) among the good solutions, and features not observed in any of the generated solutions (the “must-avoids”). This approach provides valuable insights into the synthesis problem and opens up a wide range of rational decision options.

[1]  Ryohei Yokoyama,et al.  Optimal structural design of residential cogeneration systems in consideration of their operating restrictions , 2014 .

[2]  G. Wozny,et al.  Utility systems operation: Optimisation-based decision making , 2011 .

[3]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Application of energy system models for designing a low-carbon society , 2011 .

[4]  Joseph Fiksel,et al.  The quest for sustainability: Challenges for process systems engineering , 2003 .

[5]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  A model to design and optimize multi-energy systems in buildings at the design concept stage , 2010 .

[6]  André Bardow,et al.  Superstructure-free synthesis and optimization of distributed industrial energy supply systems , 2012 .

[7]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Calculating minimum energy urban layouts with mathematical programming and Monte Carlo analysis techniques , 2011, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[8]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Advances in Energy Systems Engineering , 2011 .

[9]  Robin Smith,et al.  Design and Optimization of Flexible Utility Systems Subject to Variable Conditions: Part 1: Modelling Framework , 2007 .

[10]  Zonghao Gu,et al.  Generating Multiple Solutions for Mixed Integer Programming Problems , 2007, IPCO.

[11]  Hlynur Stefansson,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Discrete and continuous time representations and mathematical models for large production scheduling problems : A case study from the pharmaceutical industry , 2011 .

[12]  Xianglong Luo,et al.  Modeling and optimization of a utility system containing multiple extractions steam turbines , 2011 .

[13]  Klaus Lucas,et al.  Multicriterial optimisation of communal energy supply concepts , 2007 .

[14]  Giuseppe Marco Tina,et al.  Short-term scheduling of industrial cogeneration systems for annual revenue maximisation , 2012 .

[15]  André Bardow,et al.  Automated superstructure-based synthesis and optimization of distributed energy supply systems , 2013 .

[16]  Robin Smith,et al.  Design and Optimization of Flexible Utility Systems Subject to Variable Conditions: Part 2 Methodology and Applications , 2007 .

[17]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Optimisation based design of a district energy system for an eco-town in the United Kingdom , 2011 .

[18]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Experiments concerning sequential versus simultaneous maximization of objective function and distance , 2008, J. Heuristics.

[19]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  Autoassociative neural networks , 1992 .

[20]  André Bardow,et al.  Exploring the Near-Optimal Solution Space for the Synthesis of Distributed Energy Supply Systems , 2013 .

[21]  Diane Hildebrandt,et al.  Process Synthesis Targets: A New Approach to Teaching Design , 2009 .

[22]  André Bardow,et al.  A hybrid approach for the efficient synthesis of renewable energy systems , 2014 .

[23]  Robert Biswas-Diener,et al.  The Subjective Well-Being of the Homeless, and Lessons for Happiness , 2006 .

[24]  François Maréchal,et al.  Methods for multi-objective investment and operating optimization of complex energy systems , 2012 .

[25]  E. Balas,et al.  Canonical Cuts on the Unit Hypercube , 1972 .

[26]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  An energy systems engineering approach to the optimal design of energy systems in commercial buildings , 2010 .

[27]  Nilay Shah,et al.  The impact of CHP (combined heat and power) planning restrictions on the efficiency of urban energy systems , 2012 .

[28]  A. Seth,et al.  Global climate change: An introduction and results from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) , 2007 .

[29]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Centralised and distributed electricity systems , 2008 .

[30]  R. Raman,et al.  RELATION BETWEEN MILP MODELLING AND LOGICAL INFERENCE FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS SYNTHESIS , 1991 .

[31]  L. T. Fan,et al.  Combinatorially Accelerated Branch-and-Bound Method for Solving the MIP Model of Process Network Synthesis , 1996 .

[32]  Diego Micheli,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigations on a Combustor Model for Syngas Swirl Flames , 2010 .

[33]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Modelling and optimization of retrofitting residential energy systems at the urban scale , 2014 .

[34]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Structure optimization of energy supply systems in tertiary sector buildings , 2009 .

[35]  P. Mulheran,et al.  Towards an objective method to compare energy storage technologies: development and validation of a model to determine the upper boundary of revenue available from electrical price arbitrage , 2012 .

[36]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  A Brief Review of Methods for the Design and Synthesis Optimization of Energy Systems , 2002 .

[37]  Michael T Needham,et al.  A Psychological Approach to a Thriving Resilient Community , 2011 .

[38]  Ryohei Yokoyama,et al.  A MILP decomposition approach to large scale optimization in structural design of energy supply systems , 2002 .

[39]  Sebastian Engell,et al.  Optimization-based design of reactive distillation columns using a memetic algorithm , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[40]  F Galvanin Design for Energy and the Environment , 2010 .

[41]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Continuous-time versus discrete-time approaches for scheduling of chemical processes: a review , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[42]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multiobjective Design and Optimization of Urban Energy Systems , 2008 .

[43]  Xu Rong,et al.  A review on distributed energy resources and MicroGrid , 2008 .

[44]  Lazaros G. Papageorgiou,et al.  A mathematical programming approach for optimal design of distributed energy systems at the neighbourhood level , 2012 .

[45]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  A review of domestic heat pumps , 2012 .

[46]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Demand side management: Benefits and challenges ☆ , 2008 .

[47]  Ferenc Friedler,et al.  Combinatorial algorithms for process synthesis , 1992 .

[48]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design , 1997 .

[49]  Z. Kravanja,et al.  Suitable Modeling for Process Flow Sheet Optimization Using the Correct Economic Criterion , 2011 .

[50]  François Maréchal,et al.  Multi-objectives, multi-period optimization of district energy systems: III. Distribution networks , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[51]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems , 2010 .