Para-Social Presence and Communication Capabilities of a Web Site: A Theoretical Perspective

The goal of this paper is to describe the theoretical underpinnings of the construct Para-social Presence and to develop an instrument to measure this construct. Para-social presence refers to the extent to which a medium facilitates a sense of understanding, connection, involvement and interaction among participating social entities. We make a case for treating a web site as a valid social actor and argue that the relationship between a web site and her visitors should be characterized in much the same way one would characterize an inter-personal relationship. We also argue that a web site could possess different levels of para-social presence depending on how it is configured and used. We then develop a research framework that illustrates the impact of new technologies (such as personalization systems) and associated web interface design decisions on perceived communication characteristics of a web site, para-social presence, and subsequent user evaluations of the web site.

[1]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Anthropocentrism and computers , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[3]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[4]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Immersive virtual reality technology , 1995 .

[6]  Gerald Millerson.  The technique of television production , 1961 .

[7]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication , 1987 .

[8]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites , 1998 .

[9]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes , 1964 .

[10]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[11]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .

[12]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations , 1991 .

[13]  C. Nass,et al.  Voices, boxes, and sources of messages: Computers and social actors. , 1993 .

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Information Technology and the Future Enterprise : New Models for Managers , 2000 .

[15]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences , 2000 .

[17]  C. Heeter.  Communication research on consumer VR , 1995 .

[18]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Constructing Preferences Online , 1999 .

[19]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[21]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[22]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[24]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Electronic shopping , 1998, CACM.

[25]  Bruce D. Weinberg,et al.  Don't keep your Internet customers waiting too long at the (virtual) front door , 2000 .

[26]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[27]  Youngme Moon.  Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers , 2000 .

[28]  B. Kahn,et al.  How Tolerable is Delay? Consumers’ Evaluations of Internet Web Sites after Waiting , 1998 .

[29]  B DavisGordon,et al.  An investigation of media selection among directors and managers , 1998 .

[30]  Nina Mažar.  Interactive Decision Aids , 2003 .

[31]  F. Biocca,et al.  Communication in the age of virtual reality , 1995 .

[32]  D. Solomon,et al.  Structuring the concept of relational communication , 1999 .

[33]  David Gefen,et al.  Managing User Trust in B2C e-Services , 2003 .

[34]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  How Much Bandwidth Is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes , 1999, MIS Q..

[36]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[37]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[38]  C. Voss.  Developing an eService Strategy , 2000 .

[39]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[40]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[41]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Content versus structure in information environments: a longitudinal analysis of website preferences , 2000, ICIS.