Facilitating generation of local knowledge using a collaborative initiator: A NIMBY case in Guangzhou, China

Abstract This study claims that the synergic effects of collaborative governance and effective knowledge integration can solve the wicked policy issues. The function of collaborative initiators (CIs) is studied and defined. The mindset of leaders and entrepreneurs as CIs is generally different from that of public managers. Such mindset helps facilitate collaborative dynamics integrating otherwise distributed capacities and knowledge within policy networks. This study examines a case with reference to the site selection of a waste incineration power plant in Guangzhou, China. A unilateral process emerges among the residents of the district to accumulate the self-qualified knowledge before a general discussion was put forward. “Explicit knowledge” intensifies the hostile situation between the public and officials although such knowledge can be easily accessed through an Internet search. A general discussion reveals the potential for generating local knowledge conducive to abolishing the not-in-my-backyard mentality and prompting collaborative problem solving. District government officials are potential CIs whose roles remain in their infancy. This study finds that a collaborative initiator lacks entrepreneurship when faced with an influx of public opinions. The Chinese CIs vacillate between a rule-dominated manager and a policy entrepreneur with the evolution of China into a more diversified society.

[1]  B. Head.  Evidence‐Based Policymaking – Speaking Truth to Power? , 2013 .

[2]  Gwendolyn Wright,et al.  Building the dream , 1981 .

[3]  Marcel Braun,et al.  The evolution of emissions trading in the European Union – The role of policy networks, knowledge and policy entrepreneurs , 2009 .

[4]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[5]  Swee C. Goh,et al.  Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  R. Hogan,et al.  Need to Share , 2006 .

[7]  A. Gerlak,et al.  Adaptation in Collaborative Governance Regimes , 2014, Environmental Management.

[8]  Elisa S. Weiss,et al.  Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research , 2003, Journal of Urban Health.

[9]  C. Ansell,et al.  Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice , 2007 .

[10]  M. Feldman,et al.  The Role of the Public Manager in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation , 2007 .

[11]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks , 1996 .

[12]  Edward P. Weber,et al.  Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings , 2008 .

[13]  G. Simmel.  The Metropolis and Mental Life , 2012 .

[14]  N. Roberts,et al.  Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process , 1991 .

[15]  D. Booher.  Collaborative governance practices and democracy , 2004 .

[16]  R. Lasker,et al.  Partnership synergy: a practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[17]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Making Better Places: The Planning Project in the Twenty-First Century , 2010 .

[18]  Konstantinos Tatsis,et al.  The effect of students’ roles on the establishment of shared knowledge during collaborative problem solving: a case study from the field of mathematics , 2007 .

[19]  David Lazer,et al.  Searching for Answers , 2011 .

[20]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Bill Thornton,et al.  Not in My Back Yard : Evidence for Arousal Moderating Vested Interest and Oppositional Behavior to Proposed Change , 2010 .

[22]  Michael Dear,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[23]  Tina Nabatchi,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance , 2012 .

[24]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Models of Urban Governance , 1999 .

[25]  John M. Bryson,et al.  Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management , 2014 .

[26]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[27]  D. Yanow.  Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries , 2004 .

[28]  M. Liakopoulou.  The Professional Competence of Teachers: Which qualities, attitudes, skills and knowledge contribute to a teacher's effectiveness? , 2011 .

[29]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[30]  A. Cresswell,et al.  From "Need to Know" to "Need to Share": Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks , 2009 .

[31]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[32]  Jie Gao.  How Does Chinese Local Government Respond to Citizen Satisfaction Surveys? A Case Study of Foshan City (中国地方政府如何响应公民满意度调查？来自广东省佛山市的案例研究) , 2012 .