Collaborative Modeling and Social Learning in the Context of Joint Forest Management in East Sikkim, India

In an effort to address challenges arising out of traditional forms of public participation, several alternative strategies for encouraging stakeholder engagement in conservation have been implemented. The role of social learning in addressing these ecological complexities has gained increasing attention in natural resource management over the last decade. Social learning forms the backbone of any collaborative conceptual modeling of complex human–environmental systems. Collaborative modeling, grounded in social learning theory, is the practice of building models with rather than for stakeholders. By focusing on stakeholder interests rather than positions, collaborative modeling enables joint action through interactive, iterative, and reflective processes. Using a case study conducted in East Sikkim, India, we hypothesize that in situations where opportunities for formal environmental education are limited, and avenues for meaningful stakeholder engagement are few, collaborative modeling can help create a platform where stakeholders have meaningful opportunities to engage, learn, share, and (re)negotiate with a focus on joint problem solving. In particular, we engaged stakeholders in an iterative collaborative modeling process in an attempt to enable them to (1) openly interact with each other, (2) build trust, (3) unfold mutual interdependencies through social learning and thus see themselves as part of a complex human-dominated ecosystem, and (4) build and translate these shared visions toward collaborative forest management in the region. Using Senecah’s Trinity of Voice as an analytical framework, we further examined how participation in the collaborative modeling process provided stakeholders with access, standing, and influence—the three critical dimensions of “voice”. Our results demonstrate that the collaborative modeling process enabled key stakeholders to unfold mutual interdependencies, and opened spaces for knowledge (re)creation, sharing, trust building, and power sharing. By moving beyond narrow technical strategies for conservation, the collaborative modeling process helped create a platform that provided stakeholders with voice—a chance to share their environmental knowledge and joint visions toward formulating effective conservation plans that address the growing uncertainties of managing complex human-dominated systems.

[1]  Dennis Meadows,et al.  The Systems Thinking Playbook: Exercises to Stretch and Build Learning and Systems Thinking Capabilities , 2010 .

[2]  Benjamin L. Preston,et al.  Climate change vulnerability assessments as catalysts for social learning: four case studies in south-eastern Australia , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[3]  Michael Lehning,et al.  Enabling effective problem-oriented research for sustainable development , 2012 .

[4]  Eva K. Wollenberg,et al.  Social learning in the collaborative management of community forests: lessons from the field , 2001 .

[5]  Leah Sprain,et al.  Paradoxes of Public Participation in Climate Change Governance , 2017 .

[6]  Thomas F. Thornton,et al.  Collaborative Engagement of Local and Traditional Knowledge and Science in Marine Environments: A Review , 2012 .

[7]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Social Control Frames: Opportunities or Constraints? , 2003 .

[8]  S. Daniels,et al.  Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach , 2001 .

[9]  Sanjay Kumar Does "Participation" in Common Pool Resource Management Help the Poor? A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of Joint Forest Management in Jharkhand, India , 2002 .

[10]  Eelco van Beek,et al.  Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Christopher Vaughan,et al.  The Effect of Environmental Education on Schoolchildren, Their Parents, and Community Members: A Study of Intergenerational and Intercommunity Learning , 2003 .

[12]  Marjan van den Belt,et al.  Integrated Freshwater Solutions — A New Zealand Application of Mediated Modeling† , 2013 .

[13]  Stewart Fast,et al.  Public Trust in Environmental Decision-Making: A Case Study of Shale Gas Regulation in Kent County, New Brunswick , 2018 .

[14]  Tracylee Clarke,et al.  Engaging Latino/a Communities in National Park Programs: Building Trust and Providing Opportunities for Voice , 2015 .

[15]  SikkimInformation,et al.  Biodiversity of Sikkim: Exploring and Conserving a Global Hotspot , 2011 .

[16]  George E. Mobus,et al.  Teaching systems thinking to general education students , 2018 .

[17]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Joint forest management in India and its ecological impacts , 2002 .

[18]  A. Falanga,et al.  Summary and Conclusions , 2009, Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis.

[19]  Blane Harvey,et al.  Social learning and climate change adaptation: evidence for international development practice , 2015 .

[20]  Manjit Singh Sandhu,et al.  Knowledge sharing among Malaysian academics: Influence of affective commitment and trust , 2013 .

[21]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Nigel Dudley,et al.  Future oriented conservation: knowledge governance, uncertainty and learning , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[23]  Sharmistha Bose Role of User Groups and Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in strengthening Participatory Forest Management in India , 2006 .

[24]  D. Thomas Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? , 2017 .

[25]  Hallie Eakin,et al.  Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation , 2015 .

[26]  B. Crona,et al.  Stakeholder participation and sustainable fisheries: an integrative framework for assessing adaptive comanagement processes , 2014 .

[27]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Mediated Modeling: Using Collaborative Processes to Integrate Scientist and Stakeholder Knowledge about Greenhouse Gas Emissions in an Urban Ecosystem , 2010 .

[28]  T. Martín,et al.  Muting the Voice of the Local in the Age of the Global: How Communication Practices Compromised Public Participation in India's Allain Dunhangan Environmental Impact Assessment , 2007 .

[29]  Ryan C. Atwell Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  Herry Purnomo,et al.  Model for collaborative planning of community-managed resources based on qualitative soft systems approach , 2004 .

[31]  Craig E. Tweedie,et al.  Engaging Fishers' Ecological Knowledge for Endangered Species Conservation: Four Advantages to Emphasizing Voice in Participatory Action Research , 2019, Front. Commun..

[32]  Richard N. Palmer,et al.  Collaborative Modeling for Decision Support in Water Resources: Principles and Best Practices , 2013 .

[33]  Carl Folke,et al.  Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity Conservation , 1993 .

[34]  Steven E. Daniels,et al.  From the Forest to the River: Citizens' Views of Stakeholder Engagement , 2006 .

[35]  Catherine Macombe,et al.  Participatory methods, guidelines and good practice guidance to be applied throughout the project to enhance problem definition, co-learning, synthesis and dissemination , 2005 .

[36]  Tracylee Clarke,et al.  The Construction of Goshute Political Identity: Negotiation of Voice Regarding Nuclear Waste Policy Development , 2017, Front. Commun..

[37]  Tarla Rai Peterson,et al.  Environmental Conflict Communication , 2006 .

[38]  Paulami Banerjee,et al.  Community conversations on conservation , 2016 .

[39]  Jens Newig,et al.  Participatory governance and sustainability: Findings of a meta-analysis of stakeholder involvement in environmental decision making , 2009 .