Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in malignant breast lesions using different b value combinations

AbstractObjectivesTo explore how apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in malignant breast lesions are affected by selection of b values in the monoexponential model and to compare ADCs with diffusion coefficients (Ds) obtained from the biexponential model.MethodsTwenty-four women (mean age 51.3 years) with locally advanced breast cancer were included in this study. Pre-treatment diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed using a 1.5-T system with b values of 0, 50, 100, 250 and 800 s/mm2. Thirteen different b value combinations were used to derive individual monoexponential ADC maps. All b values were used in the biexponential model.ResultsMedian ADC (including all b values) and D were 1.04 × 10-3 mm2/s (range 0.82–1.61 × 10-3 mm2/s) and 0.84 × 10-3 mm2/s (range 0.17–1.56 × 10-3 mm2/s), respectively. There was a strong positive correlation between ADCs and Ds. For clinically relevant b value combinations, maximum deviation between ADCs including and excluding low b values (<100 s/mm2) was 11.8 %.ConclusionSelection of b values strongly affects ADCs of malignant breast lesions. However, by excluding low b values, ADCs approach biexponential Ds, demonstrating that microperfusion influences the diffusion signal. Thus, care should be taken when ADC calculation includes low b values.Key Points• Diffusion-weighted sequences are increasingly used in breast magnetic resonance imaging • Diffusion-weighting (b) values strongly influence apparent diffusion coefficients of malignant lesions • Exclusion of low b values reduces the apparent diffusion coefficient • Flow-insensitive monoexponential apparent diffusion coefficients approach biexponential diffusion coefficients

[1]  Peter Gibbs,et al.  Diffusion changes precede size reduction in neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[3]  Oliver Geier,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for pretreatment prediction and monitoring of treatment response of patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[4]  C. Iacconi Diffusion and perfusion of the breast. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast‐enhanced kinetics , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Bong Joo Kang,et al.  The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values for Breast Tumors , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.

[7]  Peter R Luijten,et al.  Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: The influence of the choice of b‐values , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[9]  Masanori Ozaki,et al.  ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[10]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[11]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[12]  Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira,et al.  Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  D. Collins,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion in body diffusion-weighted MRI: reality and challenges. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Controlling angiogenesis in breast cancer: a systematic review of anti-angiogenic trials. , 2012, Cancer treatment reviews.

[15]  H. Yabuuchi,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm2) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes , 2013, Breast Cancer.

[16]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[17]  Ning-Yu An,et al.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  D. Sodickson,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  T. Helbich,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? , 2009, Radiology.

[20]  B. Naume,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging , 2010, European Radiology.

[21]  U. Sharma,et al.  Longitudinal study of the assessment by MRI and diffusion‐weighted imaging of tumor response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[22]  Usha Sinha,et al.  In vivo diffusion‐weighted MRI of the breast: Potential for lesion characterization , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[24]  Kei Yamada,et al.  Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. , 2008, Radiology.