Principal Deformations Modes of Articulated Models for the Analysis of 3D Spine Deformities

Articulated models are commonly used for recognition tasks in robotics and in gait analysis, but can also be extremely useful to develop analytical methods targeting spinal deformities studies. The threedimensional analysis of these deformities is critical since they are complex and not restricted to a given plane. Thus, they cannot be assessed as a two-dimensional phenomenon. However, analyzing large databases of 3D spine models is a difficult and time-consuming task. In this context, a method that automatically extracts the most important deformation modes from sets of articulated spine models is proposed. The spine was modeled with two levels of details. In the first level, the global shape of the spine was expressed using a set of rigid transformations that superpose local coordinates systems of neighboring vertebrae. In the second level, anatomical landmarks measured with respect to a vertebra’s local coordinate system were used to quantify vertebra shape. These articulated spine models do not naturally belong to a vector space because of the vertebral rotations. The Frechet mean, which is a generalization of the conventional mean to Riemannian manifolds, was thus used to compute the mean spine shape. Moreover, a generalized covariance computed in the tangent space of the Frechet mean was used to construct a statistical shape model of the scoliotic spine. The principal deformation modes were then extracted by performing a principal component analysis (PCA) on the generalized covariance matrix. The principal deformations modes were computed for a large database of untreated scoliotic patients. The obtained results indicate that combining rotation, translation and local vertebra shape into a unified framework leads to an effective and meaningful analysis method for articulated anatomical structures. The computed deformation modes also revealed clinically relevant information. For instance, the first mode of deformation is associated with patients’ growth, the second is a double thoraco-lumbar curve and the third is a thoracic curve. Other experiments were performed on patients classified by orthopedists with respect to a widely used two-dimensional surgical planning system (the Lenke classification) and patterns relevant to the definition of a new three-dimensional classification were identified. Finally, relationships between local vertebrae shapes and global spine shape (such as vertebra wedging) were demonstrated using a sample of 3D spine reconstructions with 14 anatomical landmarks per vertebra. KeyWords: Shape Analysis, Articulated Models, Spinal Deformities, Scoliosis, 3D Reconstruction, Surgical Classifications.

[1]  H Labelle,et al.  Geometric Torsion in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Three-Dimensional Analysis and Proposal for a New Classification , 2001, Spine.

[2]  Ian D. Reid,et al.  Articulated Body Motion Capture by Stochastic Search , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Cristian Sminchisescu,et al.  Estimating Articulated Human Motion with Covariance Scaled Sampling , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[4]  Yuichi Motai,et al.  Learning by observation of robotic tasks using on-line PCA-based Eigen behavior , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[5]  I. Stokes,et al.  Identifying Sources of Variability in Scoliosis Classification Using a Rule-Based Automated Algorithm , 2002, Spine.

[6]  Max Mignotte,et al.  3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. , 2003, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[7]  Xavier Varona,et al.  Analysis of Human Walking Based on aSpaces , 2004, AMDO.

[8]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  3D anatomical variability assessment of the scoliotic spine using statistics on Lie groups , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[9]  Stefano Negrini,et al.  The three-dimensional easy morphological (3-DEMO) classification of scoliosis – Part III, correlation with clinical classification and parameters , 2007, Scoliosis.

[10]  I. Stokes,et al.  Mechanical Modulation of Vertebral Body Growth: Implications for Scoliosis Progression , 1996, Spine.

[11]  Ling Guan,et al.  Quantifying and recognizing human movement patterns from monocular video Images-part I: a new framework for modeling human motion , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[12]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  Intrinsic Statistics on Riemannian Manifolds: Basic Tools for Geometric Measurements , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[13]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Three-Dimensional Classification of Spinal Deformities Using Fuzzy Clustering , 2006, Spine.

[14]  Stefano Negrini,et al.  Three-dimensional easy morphological (3-DEMO) classification of scoliosis, part I , 2006, Scoliosis.

[15]  H. King,et al.  SELECTION OF FUSION LEVELS FOR POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND FUSION IN IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS , 1988, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[16]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Parameterized Modeling and Recognition of Activities , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[17]  C. H. Rivard,et al.  Vertebral deformities and scoliosis , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[18]  Adam Prügel-Bennett,et al.  A Bayesian Framework for Extracting Human Gait Using Strong Prior Knowledge , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  Stefano Negrini,et al.  The three-dimensional easy morphological (3-DEMO) classification of scoliosis, part II: repeatability , 2006, Scoliosis.

[20]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Prediction of anterior scoliotic spinal curve from trunk surface using support vector regression , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[21]  R. Betz,et al.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A New Classification to Determine Extent of Spinal Arthrodesis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[23]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Morphometric Analysis of Anatomic Scoliotic Specimens , 2002, Spine.

[24]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Generation of Point-Based 3D Statistical Shape Models for Anatomical Objects , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[25]  I. Stokes Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. , 1994, Spine.

[26]  Stephan Al-Zubi,et al.  Learning Deformations of Human Arm Movement to Adapt to Environmental Constraints , 2006, AMDO.

[27]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Deformations Incorporating Rigid Structures , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[28]  Laurent Desbat,et al.  Integrated Approach for Matching Statistical Shape Models with Intra-operative 2D and 3D Data , 2002, MICCAI.

[29]  R R Betz,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Classification of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis*† , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[30]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[31]  X. Pennec Computing the Mean of Geometric Features Application to the Mean Rotation , 1998 .

[32]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Ling Guan,et al.  Quantifying and recognizing human movement patterns from monocular video images-part II: applications to biometrics , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.