Bibliometric Analysis of the Articles Published in the Ophthalmic Epidemiology Journal Between 2002 and 2019

ABS TRACT Objective: The purpose of this study is to present a holistic analysis of published items in Ophthalmic Epidemiology Journal (OEJ). Material and Methods: The data used in this study were obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection. WoS en-abled the extensive details of documents published in OEJ between 2002-2019 including countries, institutions, authors, citations and keywords. Scientometric network maps of keywords and country and in- stitution co-authorships were created. Country contributions to the OEJ were shown on a graphic. Results: The search query revealed a total of 991 documents. Most of the documents were original articles (90.11%). The peak year when the maximum number of the documents (86) and total number of citations (1687) occurred was 2018. The h-index of the literature published in OEJ was 49. The average citations per item was 13.9. USA was the leading country by producing 40.42% of all documents followed by UK, Australia, India and China. The London University was the most contributing institution (5.25%) followed by London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine and Johns Hopkins University. The most used keywords were ‘Acuity’, ‘Survey’ and ‘Child’. Conclusion: Beneficial information about dynamic and trending search topics in ophthalmic epidemiology field may be obtained by this study.

[1]  T. Wong,et al.  Profiles of Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population: The Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study. , 2020, Ophthalmology.

[2]  F. Mimouni,et al.  Research productivity across different ophthalmic subspecialties in the United States , 2019, BMC Health Services Research.

[3]  T. Wong,et al.  Profile of retinal nerve fibre layer symmetry in a multiethnic Asian population: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases study , 2019, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  Jie-Jin Wang,et al.  Systemic medications and cortical cataract: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study , 2019, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  E. Şenel Health and Ancient Beliefs: A Scientometric Analysis of Health Literature Related to Shamanism, Paganism and Spirituality , 2019, Journal of Religion and Health.

[6]  G. Sivasubramaniyan,et al.  Bibliometric Analysis of Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine (2014 – 2018) , 2019, Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services.

[7]  L. Rezaei,et al.  Scientometric Analysis of Iranian Scientific Productions in the Field of Ophthalmology , 2018 .

[8]  Concepción S. Wilson,et al.  The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics , 2001, Scientometrics.

[9]  M. Wilson Epidemiology in ophthalmology. , 2001, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[10]  Dirk Schoonbaert,et al.  Impact takes precedence over interest , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Robert N. Broadus Toward a definition of “bibliometrics” , 1987, Scientometrics.

[12]  F. Mouriaux,et al.  International publication trends in dry eye disease research: A bibliometric analysis. , 2018, The ocular surface.

[13]  Yih-Chung Tham,et al.  Top 100 cited articles in ophthalmic epidemiology between 2006 and 2016. , 2018, International journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Jennifer C Fan,et al.  Citation analysis of the most influential authors and ophthalmology journals in the field of cataract and corneal refractive surgery 2000–2004 , 2008, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.