Educational Gamified Science Simulations

Modern STEM education is mainly grounded in constructivism. It requires instructors to not only recite learning content, but also to teach the concepts and ideas behind abstract formulas. Interactive simulations are one of the most powerful tools for increasing the students’ problem-solving abilities, and enhancing their understanding of conceptual models and formulas, which are hard to visualize without technology-enhanced tools. Creating simulation tools of interest to students has the potential to enhance their understanding of the phenomena and increase their interest in science. However, many simulations are not engaging and students will lose interest in interacting with them after a short time. Hence, it is important to advance in particular the motivational design aspects of such educational tools. One idea for motivating students is the use of computer games. Different studies show the positive impacts of a game-based or gamified approach in the field of STEM education and training. Several theories and frameworks were researched and developed to support the game design and gamification process of various scenarios. However, only a few cover specific design issues and implications of educational and instructional simulations. In this chapter we introduce a gamification model, which is adapted accordingly to the characteristics of constructivist STEM education approaches with focus on the usage of science simulations. Therefore we will introduce a model for the adaption of gamification techniques to design, develop, and adapt educational simulations. Based on a background and literature study, a framework for implementing a gamification approach for different kinds of simulations is introduced and applied to an application scenario of our own research. As a result, both the lessons learned and further recommendations are outlined.

[1]  Sam Reid,et al.  A Study of Educational Simulations Part 1 - Engagement and Learning , 2008 .

[2]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[3]  M. Sanders.  STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania , 2009 .

[4]  Evelyne F. Vallières,et al.  The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education , 1992 .

[5]  Christopher Cunningham,et al.  Gamification by Design - Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps , 2011 .

[6]  Katrin Becker,et al.  The Guide to Computer Simulations and Games , 2011 .

[7]  B. Sutton-Smith,et al.  The Study of Games , 1971 .

[8]  Azizah Jaafar,et al.  Educational games (EG) design framework: Combination of game design, pedagogy and content modeling , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics.

[9]  William V. Wright,et al.  A Theory of Fun for Game Design , 2004 .

[10]  Richard N. Van Eck.  Digital Game-Based Learning: It's Not Just the Digital Natives Who Are Restless. , 2006 .

[11]  Henry Kelly,et al.  How to build serious games , 2007, CACM.

[12]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[13]  C. Douglas Wetzel,et al.  The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A Review of Recent Research , 1992 .

[14]  David Salesin,et al.  The challenge of designing scientific discovery games , 2010, FDG.

[15]  D. Eichel.  Beyond Boredom And Anxiety Experiencing Flow In Work And Play , 2016 .

[16]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[17]  B. Weiner,et al.  Theories and principles of motivation. , 1996 .

[18]  Z. Popovic,et al.  Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[20]  Jesse Schell,et al.  The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses , 2019 .

[21]  T. Andre,et al.  Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: the roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs , 1996 .

[22]  Brenda Brathwaite,et al.  Challenges for Game Designers , 2008 .

[23]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Design Research: Methods and Perspectives , 2003 .

[24]  Tracy Mitrano.  A Wider World: Youth, Privacy, and Social Networking Technologies. , 2006 .

[25]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification" , 2011, MindTrek.

[26]  Adrien Treuille,et al.  Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game , 2010, Nature.

[27]  J. McGonigal.  Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[28]  M. Blanchette,et al.  Phylo: A Citizen Science Approach for Improving Multiple Sequence Alignment , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  Merrilea J. Mayo,et al.  Games for science and engineering education , 2007, CACM.

[30]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[31]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Electromagnetism Supercharged! Learning Physics with Digital Simulation Games , 2004, ICLS.

[32]  J. D. Fletcher,et al.  Game-Based Learning , 2014 .