Optimization of the Ecological Network Structure Based on Scenario Simulation and Trade-Offs/Synergies among Ecosystem Services in Nanping

The optimization of the ecological network structure in Nanping can provide a scientific reference for guaranteeing ecological safety in Southeast China. This study estimated ecosystem services in Nanping with the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model based on land-use data from 2020 to 2025 simulated with the CLUE-S model under the natural development scenario and ecological protection scenario and then explored their trade-offs and synergies. The ecological network structure was, thereafter, optimized in terms of the eco-matrix, eco-corridors and nodes based on simulated land use and ecosystem services. The results suggested that the average habitat quality and total soil retention increased, while the average degradation index and total water yield decreased under the ecological protection scenario, indicating that the ecological environment quality tended to be improved. In addition, soil retention had significant synergies with habitat quality and water yield, and habitat quality had significant trade-offs with ecological degradation and water yield on the regional scale under two scenarios, while ecological degradation also showed significant trade-offs with soil retention and water yield. In addition, the results suggested that 11 additional ecological sources could be added, and the number of eco-corridors increased from 15 to 136; a total of 1019 ecological break points were restored, and 1481 stepping stone patches were deployed, which jointly made network circuitry, edge/node ratio and network connectivity reach 0.45, 1.86 and 0.64, respectively, indicating that optimization could effectively improve the structure and connectivity of the ecological network. These findings can provide a theoretical basis for improving the ecological network structure and ecological service functions in Nanping and other regions.

[1]  Haijun Wang,et al.  Constructing and optimizing urban ecological network in the context of rapid urbanization for improving landscape connectivity , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[2]  M. Su,et al.  Spatiotemporal variation of essential ecosystem services and their trade-off/synergy along with rapid urbanization in the Lower Pearl River Basin, China , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[3]  Danling Chen,et al.  How urban sprawl influences eco-environmental quality: Empirical research in China by using the Spatial Durbin model , 2021 .

[4]  Jian Peng,et al.  How can massive ecological restoration programs interplay with social-ecological systems? A review of research in China's karst region. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Spatial interactions among ecosystem services and the identification of win-win areas at the regional scale , 2021 .

[6]  Xiuhua Shi,et al.  Research on optimization of ecological service function and planning control of land resources planning based on ecological protection and restoration , 2021 .

[7]  S. Passel,et al.  Rapid economic valuation of ecosystem services in man and biosphere reserves in Africa: A review , 2021, Global Ecology and Conservation.

[8]  A. Salmanmahiny,et al.  Hydrological connectivity assessment of landscape ecological network to mitigate development impacts. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Xiaomin Xiang,et al.  An integrated evaluation framework for Land-Space ecological restoration planning strategy making in rapidly developing area , 2021 .

[10]  Quanhua Hou,et al.  Smart city oriented ecological corridor layout of Sanshui River Basin in arid area of Loess Plateau , 2021 .

[11]  Jinman Wang,et al.  Construction of landscape ecological network based on landscape ecological risk assessment in a large-scale opencast coal mine area , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Xiao-li Luo,et al.  Integrating the MCR and DOI models to construct an ecological security network for the urban agglomeration around Poyang Lake, China. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  Shi-liang Liu,et al.  Ecological network construction of the heterogeneous agro-pastoral areas in the upper Yellow River basin , 2020 .

[14]  Haiming Yan,et al.  Spatial Structure of a Potential Ecological Network in Nanping, China, Based on Ecosystem Service Functions , 2020, Land.

[15]  Weiguo Jiang,et al.  Simulating wetland changes under different scenarios based on integrating the random forest and CLUE-S models: A case study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration , 2020 .

[16]  Daniela Torres Morandi,et al.  Delimitation of ecological corridors between conservation units in the Brazilian Cerrado using a GIS and AHP approach , 2020 .

[17]  Jinghu Pan,et al.  Spatiotemporal pattern of trade-offs and synergistic relationships among multiple ecosystem services in an arid inland river basin in NW China , 2020, Ecological Indicators.

[18]  Lu Xing,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services value and uncertainty into regional ecological risk assessment: A case study of Hubei Province, Central China. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Xiaobing Li,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services bundles for analyzing spatial trade-offs in inner Mongolia, China , 2020 .

[20]  Jochen Hack,et al.  A Conceptual Approach to Modeling the Geospatial Impact of Typical Urban Threats on the Habitat Quality of River Corridors , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Qi Fu,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Storage in Response to Urbanization: A Case Study in the Su-Xi-Chang Region, China , 2019, Processes.

[22]  G. Sonnemann,et al.  Assessing habitat loss, fragmentation and ecological connectivity in Luxembourg to support spatial planning , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[23]  Zhenzhen Zhang,et al.  Enhancing landscape connectivity through multifunctional green infrastructure corridor modeling and design , 2019, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[24]  J. Ziolkowska,et al.  An integrated approach to project environmental sustainability under future climate variability: An application to U.S. Rio Grande Basin , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[25]  Niko Balkenhol,et al.  Enhancing conservation network design with graph-theory and a measure of protected area effectiveness: Refining wildlife corridors in Belize, Central America , 2018, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[26]  M. Jha,et al.  Estimation of water balance and water yield in the Reedy Fork-Buffalo Creek Watershed in North Carolina using SWAT , 2018, International Soil and Water Conservation Research.

[27]  Zhongming Lu,et al.  Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Xue Ding,et al.  Assessing the impact of desertification dynamics on regional ecosystem service value in North China from 1981 to 2010 , 2018 .

[29]  Yuji Murayama,et al.  Monitoring surface urban heat island formation in a tropical mountain city using Landsat data (1987–2015) , 2017 .

[30]  Qibin Zhang,et al.  The optimization of urban ecological infrastructure network based on the changes of county landscape patterns: a typical case study of ecological fragile zone located at Deng Kou (Inner Mongolia) , 2017 .

[31]  Linda May,et al.  Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[32]  O. Dondina,et al.  How to manage hedgerows as effective ecological corridors for mammals: A two-species approach , 2016 .

[33]  Tõnu Oja,et al.  Integrating small-scale landscape elements into land use/cover: The impact on landscape metrics’ values , 2016 .

[34]  Ruth DeFries,et al.  Connecting the dots: mapping habitat connectivity for tigers in central India , 2016, Regional Environmental Change.

[35]  Bingkui Qiu,et al.  Vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to urbanization: A case of China , 2015 .

[36]  P. Clergeau,et al.  Potential contributions of green spaces at business sites to the ecological network in an urban agglomeration: The case of the Ile-de-France region, France , 2014 .

[37]  James R.A. Butler,et al.  An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia , 2013 .

[38]  A. Mayer,et al.  Spatial and temporal deforestation dynamics of Zagros forests (Iran) from 1972 to 2009 , 2013 .

[39]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: application to European forests (1990–2000) , 2011 .

[40]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  Ecological network analysis : network construction , 2007 .

[41]  Qiong Li,et al.  Urban water resource management for sustainable environment planning using artificial intelligence techniques , 2021 .

[42]  刘世梁 Liu Shiliang,et al.  Research progress on landscape ecological networks , 2017 .

[43]  J. Parent,et al.  Validating Landsat-based landscape metrics with fine-grained land cover data , 2016 .

[44]  Maria Ignatieva,et al.  Planning and design of ecological networks in urban areas , 2010, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.