Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded as subjects silently read a set of unrelated sentences. The ERP responses elicited by open-class words were sorted according word frequency and the ordinal position of the eliciting word within its sentence. We observed a strong inverse correlation between sentence position and the amplitude of the N400 component of the ERP. In addition, we found that less frequent words were associated with larger N400s than were more frequent words, but only if theeliciting words occurred early in their respective sentences. We take this interaction between sentence position and word frequency as evidence that frequency does not play a mandatory role in wordrecognition, but can besuperseded by the contextual constraint provided by a sentence.

[1]  R. Solomon,et al.  Word frequency, personal values, and visual duration thresholds. , 1951, Psychological review.

[2]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[3]  E. Tulving,et al.  STIMULUS INFORMATION AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION AS DETERMINANTS OF TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION OF WORDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  J. Morton.  THE EFFECTS OF CONTEXT ON THE VISUAL DURATION THRESHOLD FOR WORDS. , 1964, British journal of psychology.

[5]  H. Davis,et al.  The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[7]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[8]  D. J. Foss.  Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times , 1969 .

[9]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[10]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Falsification of the hypothesis that word frequency is a unified variable in sentence processing , 1971 .

[11]  C. A. Becker.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  R. E. Schuberth,et al.  Effects of Context on the Classification of Words and Nonwords. , 1977 .

[13]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Effects of Context on the Classification of Words and Nonwords. , 1977 .

[14]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .

[15]  C. P. Whaley.  Word–nonword classification time. , 1978 .

[16]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  I. Fischler,et al.  Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .

[18]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing , 1980, Brain and Language.

[19]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[20]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[21]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[22]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[23]  D L Woods,et al.  Electrophysiological signs of split-second decision-making. , 1980, Science.

[24]  D L Woods,et al.  Recovery cycles of event-related potentials in multiple detection tasks. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[26]  G. Kleiman,et al.  Sentence frame contexts and lexical decisions: Sentence-acceptability and word-relatedness effects , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[27]  F Grosjean,et al.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[29]  R. E. Schuberth,et al.  Effects of stimulus and contextual information on the lexical decision process , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[30]  A. Wagman.  Event-related Brain Potentials in Man , 1981 .

[31]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Frequency blocking and lexical access: One mental lexicon or two? , 1981 .

[32]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a two-process theory. , 1981 .

[33]  K. Forster.  Priming and the Effects of Sentence and Lexical Contexts on Naming Time: Evidence for Autonomous Lexical Processing* , 1981 .

[34]  Geoffrey Underwood,et al.  Word shape, orthographic regularity, and contextual interactions in a reading task , 1982, Cognition.

[35]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[36]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[38]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[39]  A. W. Inhoff.  10 – Attentional Strategies during the Reading of Short Stories1 , 1983 .

[40]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes , 1985 .

[41]  François Grosjean,et al.  Can semantic constraint reduce the role of word frequency during spoken-word recognition? , 1984 .

[42]  G. Marsh,et al.  Differences in the late components of the event-related potential due to age and to semantic and non-semantic tasks. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  T W Picton,et al.  Event‐Related Potentials during Naming a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  S. Farmer,et al.  The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[47]  L. Tyler.  The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating , 1984, Perception & Psychophysics.

[48]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[49]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event‐Related Brain Potentials (ERPs) Elicited by Novel Stimuli during Sentence Processing a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[50]  M. Rugg.  The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[51]  B. Gordon.  Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access. , 1985 .

[52]  W. Epstein,et al.  Interaction of stimulus and contextual information during reading: Identifying words within sentences , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[53]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[54]  A. Milner,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to lateralised stimuli in two cases of callosal agenesis. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[55]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[56]  M. W. Bergman,et al.  Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks ☆ , 1985 .

[57]  Event-Related Potential Paradigms Using Tin Electrodes , 1985 .

[58]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Cognitive event-related brain potentials in children with attention and reading deficits. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[59]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[60]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  E. Halgren,et al.  Human medial temporal lobe potentials evoked in memory and language tasks. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[62]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words , 1986 .

[63]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Word recognition: Context effects without priming , 1986, Cognition.

[64]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[65]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[66]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) elicited during rapid serial visual presentation of congruous and incongruous sentences. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[67]  K. Forster,et al.  A reader's view of listening , 1987, Cognition.

[68]  M. Kutas,et al.  Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation ☆ ☆☆ , 1987 .

[69]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  The Spatial Allocation of Visual Attention as Indexed by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1987, Human factors.

[70]  E Halgren,et al.  Event-related potentials during lexical decision: effects of repetition, word frequency, pronounceability, and concreteness. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[71]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Brain Potentials as Indices of Orthographic and Phonological Interaction During word Matching , 1987 .

[73]  M. Kutas,et al.  A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[74]  F. Macar,et al.  An event-related potential analysis of incongruity in music and other non-linguistic contexts. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[75]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[76]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[77]  P. Holcomb.  Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.

[78]  M. Kutas.  Event related brain potential studies of language , 1988 .

[79]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related potential asymmetries during the reading of sentences. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[80]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[81]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[82]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cross-Modal Repetition Effects on the N4 , 1991 .

[83]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.