Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jacob Cohen,et al. The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .
[2] J. Fleiss. Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .
[3] J. Fleiss,et al. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.
[4] W. Grove. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .
[5] D. Cicchetti,et al. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. , 1981, American journal of mental deficiency.
[6] R. Orwin. A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. , 1983 .
[7] L. Hedges,et al. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .
[8] B. Plake,et al. Comparing computerized versus traditional psychological assessment , 1985 .
[9] P. Albert,et al. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. , 1988, Biometrics.
[10] G. Guyatt,et al. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.
[11] R Rosenthal,et al. Meta‐analysis: a review. , 1991, Psychosomatic medicine.
[12] J. Cox,et al. Validation of a computerized version of the 10-item (self-rating) Edinburgh postnatal depression scale , 1991 .
[13] Clay E. George,et al. The effects of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of negative affect , 1992 .
[14] C Safran,et al. Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV transmission. , 1990, JAMA.
[15] R A Steer,et al. Structure of the computer-assisted Beck Anxiety Inventory with psychiatric inpatients. , 1993, Journal of personality assessment.
[16] S. Shiffman,et al. Ecological Momentary Assessment (Ema) in Behavioral Medicine , 1994 .
[17] I. Wilson,et al. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. , 1995, JAMA.
[18] Jack D. Burke,et al. Test-retest reliability in psychiatric patients of the sf-36 health survey , 1996 .
[19] N. Stuckless,et al. The effects of computer versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of anger and revenge with an inmate population , 1996 .
[20] K. McGraw,et al. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. , 1996 .
[21] M. Atkinson,et al. Computerized quality-of-life screening in an oncology clinic. , 1997, Cancer practice.
[22] N. Bellamy,et al. Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.
[23] J H Greist,et al. A computer-administered telephone interview to identify mental disorders. , 1997, JAMA.
[24] P Wright,et al. Computer anxiety: a comparison of pen-based personal digital assistants, conventional computer and paper assessment of mood and performance. , 1998, British journal of psychology.
[25] M Elia,et al. Comparison of the traditional paper visual analogue scale questionnaire with an Apple Newton electronic appetite rating system (EARS) in free living subjects feeding ad libitum , 1998, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
[26] D. Forman,et al. Automated collection of quality-of-life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[27] P. van Schaik,et al. Effect of an Educational Multimedia Prostate Program on the International Prostate Symptom Score , 1999, European Urology.
[28] Norbert Schmitz,et al. Computerized administration of the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90-R) and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C) in psychosomatic outpatients , 1999, Psychiatry Research.
[29] Stefan E. Schulenberg,et al. The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: Implications for measures of negative affect , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[30] N. Hartkamp,et al. Comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Symptom Check List (SCL‐90‐R): a randomized trial , 2000, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.
[31] M. Elia,et al. Description and evaluation of a Newton-based electronic appetite rating system for temporal tracking of appetite in human subjects , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.
[32] R. Jamison,et al. Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study , 2001, Pain.
[33] B. Tiplady,et al. Validity and sensitivity of a pen computer battery of performance tests , 2001, Journal of psychopharmacology.
[34] N. Leidy,et al. A Comparative Trial of Paper-and-Pencil Versus Computer Administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) Questionnaire , 2001, Medical care.
[35] George D. Kitas,et al. Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. , 2002, Rheumatology.
[36] J. Sorkin,et al. Factors Influencing the Use of Computer Technology in the Collection of Clinical Data in a Predominantly African‐American Population , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
[37] Michael R. Hufford,et al. Applications and What Works in the Field , 2002 .
[38] N. Bellamy,et al. Clinical evaluation of the WOMAC 3.0 OA Index in numeric rating scale format using a computerized touch screen version. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[39] Khaled J Saleh,et al. Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm‐top computers and paper surveys , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.
[40] Nathaniel P. Katz,et al. Comparative study of electronic vs. paper VAS ratings: a randomized, crossover trial using healthy volunteers , 2002, PAIN.
[41] S. Shiffman,et al. Patient non-compliance with paper diaries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[42] Ted Okon,et al. The Cancer Care Monitor: psychometric content evaluation and pilot testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients. , 2003, Journal of pain and symptom management.
[43] B. Parasuraman,et al. Electronic Versus Paper Questionnaires: A Further Comparison in Persons with Asthma , 2003, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.
[44] Stanley E. Kaufman,et al. Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: Validity, time benefits, and patient preference , 2004, Quality of Life Research.
[45] Benjamin M. Ogles,et al. Computerized Depression Screening and Awareness , 1998, Community Mental Health Journal.
[46] H. Drummond,et al. Electronic quality of life questionnaires: a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study , 1995, Quality of Life Research.
[47] New technology in quality of life research: Are all computer-assisted approaches created equal? , 2003, Quality of Life Research.
[48] R. Willke,et al. Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. , 2004, Controlled clinical trials.
[49] J. J. Caro Sr,et al. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? , 2004, Quality of Life Research.
[50] Angelia Mosley-Williams,et al. Validation of a computer version of the American College of Rheumatology patient assessment questionnaire for the autonomous self-entry of self-report data in an urban rheumatology clinic. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.
[51] Robyn Attewell,et al. A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version , 2002, Quality of Life Research.
[52] J. Gaertner,et al. Electronic pain diary: a randomized crossover study. , 2004, Journal of pain and symptom management.
[53] Mikael Palmblad,et al. Electronic diaries and questionnaires: Designing user interfaces that are easy for all patients to use , 2004, Quality of Life Research.
[54] Michel Hersen,et al. Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment , 2004 .
[55] Reyis Kurt,et al. Computer-assisted assessment of depression and function in older primary care patients , 2004, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..
[56] Paul P Stork,et al. A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children: impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability , 2004, Pain.
[57] A. N. Brand,et al. A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) , 1998, Quality of Life Research.
[58] Ingela Wiklund,et al. Assessment of patient‐reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health‐related quality of life , 2004, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.
[59] Leslie Lenert,et al. A web-compatible instrument for measuring self-reported disease activity in arthritis. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.
[60] A. Cook,et al. Electronic pain questionnaires: A randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment , 2004, Pain.
[61] N. Bellamy,et al. Responsiveness of the electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA Index in a short term clinical trial with rofecoxib. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
[62] Bill Byrom,et al. The value of computer-administered self-report data in central nervous system clinical trials. , 2005, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[63] N. Bellamy,et al. Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[64] K. Grafton,et al. Test-Retest Reliability of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire: Assessment of Intraclass Correlation Coefficients and Limits of Agreement in Patients With Osteoarthritis , 2005, The Clinical journal of pain.
[65] Jacek A Kopec,et al. Computer-administered bath ankylosing spondylitis and Quebec Scale outcome questionnaires for low back pain: agreement with traditional paper format. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.
[66] E. McColl. Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design , 2006, Quality of Life Research.
[67] T. Kvien,et al. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.
[68] H. Bischoff-Ferrari,et al. A computer touch-screen version of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument for the lumbar spine. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[69] D. Patrick,et al. Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome--Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol. , 2006, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[70] U. S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Cen Research,et al. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance , 2006, Health and quality of life outcomes.
[71] Toben F Nelson,et al. Comparing web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research. , 2006, Addictive behaviors.
[72] D V Doyle,et al. Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2006, Rheumatology.