The Transparent Trap: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on the Design of Transparent Online Disclosures in the EU

In its drive to prevent market failures and safeguard consumers, the European legislator has embraced the information approach. In the context of online trade, this requires online traders to disclose ever-growing amounts of information to consumers regarding contract terms, the handling of their personal information, and the use of cookies on the trader’s website, to name just a few of the areas involved. However, whilst adopting substantive information obligations for traders, the European legislator still tends to disregard scholarship on effective information design. This paper recommends empirically tested, interdisciplinary criteria for the design of effective disclosures online, with a focus on their application in the EU. Without clear guidance as to how disclosures should be formulated, traders are left open to accidental or purposeful obfuscation.

[1]  M. Faure,et al.  Behavioural Economics in Unfair Contract Terms , 2011 .

[2]  O. Bar‐Gill,et al.  Product Use Information and the Limits of Voluntary Disclosure , 2011 .

[3]  P. Panzarasa,et al.  Temporal patterns and dynamics of e-learning usage in medical education , 2016 .

[4]  Robert Waller,et al.  Graphic Literacies for a Digital Age: The Survival of Layout , 2012, Inf. Soc..

[5]  James P Devenney,et al.  Consumer credit, debt and investment in Europe. , 2012 .

[6]  C. Schneider,et al.  The Futility of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Financial Disclosure Regulation , 2014, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[7]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[8]  W. H. Edinger.  Promoting Educated Consumer Choices. Has EU Food Information Legislation Finally Matured? , 2016 .

[9]  V. Mak.  Standards of Protection: In Search of the 'Average Consumer' of EU Law in the Proposal for a Consumer Rights Directive , 2010 .

[10]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[11]  Natali Helberger.  Form Matters: Informing Consumers Effectively , 2013 .

[12]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[13]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Dynamic Adjustment of Eco-labeling Schemes and Consumer Choice – the Revision of the EU Energy Label as a Missed Opportunity? , 2012 .

[14]  F. Rossetti,et al.  Consumer conditions in the EU: revised framework and empirical investigation , 2015 .

[15]  Margrit Schreier,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice , 2012 .

[16]  J. Trzaskowski.  Behavioural Economics, Neuroscience, and the Unfair Commercial Practises Directive , 2011 .

[17]  Robert M. Fano.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1985, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[18]  Drawing False Inferences from Mandated Disclosures , 2017 .

[19]  Philipp Niemann,et al.  Visualizing science: the reception of powerpoint presentations , 2012 .

[20]  Emilia Djonov.  Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: A systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective , 2007 .

[21]  Jay L. Lemke,et al.  Travels in hypermodality , 2002 .

[22]  I. Ayres,et al.  The No Reading Problem in Consumer Contract Law , 2013 .

[23]  Irene Pollach.  A Typology of Communicative Strategies in Online Privacy Policies: Ethics, Power and Informed Consent , 2005 .

[24]  A HillmanRobert,et al.  Principles of the law of software contracts , 2010 .

[25]  O. Ben-shahar,et al.  Simplification of Privacy Disclosures: An Experimental Test , 2016, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[26]  O. Ben-shahar,et al.  Simplification of Privacy Disclosures: An Experimental Test , 2016, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[27]  Yannis Panagis,et al.  The Empire Strikes Back: Digital Control of Unfair Terms of Online Services , 2017 .

[28]  Justin Lewis,et al.  The Ideological Octopus: An Exploration of Television and its Audience , 1991 .

[29]  K. Purnhagen,et al.  Homo Economicus, Behavioural Sciences, and Economic Regulation: On the Concept of Man in Internal Market Regulation and Its Normative Basis , 2012 .

[30]  C. Schneider,et al.  The Futility of Cost Benefit Analysis in Financial Disclosure Regulation , 2014 .

[31]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[32]  Svend Brinkmann,et al.  Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology , 2013 .

[33]  Ursula Athenstaedt,et al.  Consumer Decisions Under High Information Load: How Can Legal Rules Improve Search Behavior and Decision Quality? , 2016 .

[34]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  K. Holmqvist,et al.  Reading Information Graphics: the Role of Spatial Contiguity and Dual Attentional Guidance , 2022 .

[36]  Steven Furnell,et al.  Online privacy: a matter of policy? , 2012 .

[37]  Stefan Grundmann,et al.  Information, Party Autonomy and Economic Agents in European Contract Law , 2002, Common Market Law Review.

[38]  A. Oehler,et al.  Good Consumer Information: the Information Paradigm at its (Dead) End? , 2017 .

[39]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Example-based learning: exploring the use of matrices and problem variability , 2015, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[40]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[41]  Marianne Bertrand,et al.  Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases and Payday Borrowing , 2009 .

[42]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don't read) online privacy notices , 2004 .

[43]  S. Livingstone.  Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[44]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Nothing to Declare , 2014, Psychological science.

[45]  G. Howells.  The Potential and Limits of Consumer Empowerment by Information , 2005 .

[46]  E. Haley,et al.  What You Think You Know: The Effects of Prior Financial Education and Readability on Financial Disclosure Processing , 2017 .

[47]  Marco Loos,et al.  Study on consumers’ attitudes towards Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) : final report , 2016 .

[48]  Hans van Trijp,et al.  Consumer preferences for front-of-pack calories labelling , 2008, Public Health Nutrition.

[49]  Jia Wen.  On Critical Linguistics , 2005 .

[50]  Catherine Garcia,et al.  Information Disclosure in the EU Consumer Credit Directive: Opportunities and Limitations , 2009 .

[51]  K. Purnhagen.  Why Do We Need Responsive Regulation and Behavioural Research in EU Internal Market Law , 2014 .

[52]  J. Luzak.  Privacy Notice for Dummies? Towards European Guidelines on How to Give “Clear and Comprehensive Information” on the Cookies’ Use in Order to Protect the Internet Users’ Right to Online Privacy , 2014 .

[53]  Birgit Phillips.  Beyond Classroom Learning: Personalized Learning Through Digital Technologies , 2016 .

[54]  R. Fowler.  On critical linguistics , 2013 .

[55]  V. Mak.  The Myth of the 'Empowered Consumer': Lessons from Financial Literacy Studies , 2012 .

[56]  Carmen Luke,et al.  Pedagogy, printing, and Protestantism : the discourse on childhood , 1990 .

[57]  Will Increased Disclosure Help? Evaluating the Recommendations of the ALI's 'Principles of the Law of Software Contracts' , 2014 .

[58]  J. K. Pappalardo,et al.  The Failure and Promise of Mandated Consumer Mortgage Disclosures: Evidence from Qualitative Interviews and a Controlled Experiment with Mortgage Borrowers , 2010 .

[59]  T. V. Dijk.  Handbook of discourse analysis , 1985 .

[60]  Adrián Thays.  Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis , 2010, QMiP Bulletin.

[61]  Sarah Brown.  Consumer credit relationships – protection, self-interest/reliance and dilemmas in the fight against unfairness: the unfair credit relationship test and the underlying rationale of consumer credit law , 2016, Legal Studies.

[62]  Kim Christian Schrøder.  Making sense of audience discourses , 2000 .

[63]  Peter C. Neijens,et al.  "Highly Recommended!" The Content Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness of Online Consumer Reviews , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[64]  K. Linos,et al.  Qualitative Methods for Law Review Writing , 2017 .

[65]  J. Hogarth,et al.  Designing disclosures to inform consumer financial decisionmaking: lessons learned from consumer testing , 2011 .

[66]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts , 2014, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[67]  Enrique Seira,et al.  Are Information Disclosure Mandates Effective? Evidence from the Credit Card Market , 2014 .

[68]  S. Weatherill.  The Consumer Rights Directive: How and why a quest for “coherence” has (largely) failed , 2012, Common Market Law Review.

[69]  A Handbook of Media and Communication Research , 2020 .

[70]  Gerald Spindler,et al.  Digitale Wirtschaft – analoges Recht: Braucht das BGB ein Update? , 2016 .

[71]  O. Ben-shahar,et al.  More Than You Wanted to Know: The Failure of Mandated Disclosure , 2014 .

[72]  Reiner Schulze,et al.  Information requirements in the e-commerce directive and the proposed directive on unfair commercial practices , 2005 .

[73]  A. Tomlinson.  POWER , 1998, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism.

[74]  Anne-Lise Sibony,et al.  European Consumer Protection Through the Behavioral Lense , 2017 .

[75]  Florencia Marotta-Wurgler,et al.  Does Contract Disclosure Matter? , 2012 .

[76]  Enrique Seira,et al.  Replication data for: Are Information Disclosures Effective? Evidence from the Credit Card Market , 2019 .

[77]  P. Desmet,et al.  “If It’s Easy to Read, It’s Easy to Claim”—The Effect of the Readability of Insurance Contracts on Consumer Expectations and Conflict Behaviour , 2016 .

[78]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[79]  Sally Harridge-March.  Can the building of trust overcome consumer perceived risk online , 2006 .

[80]  C. Sunstein,et al.  Disclosure: Psychology Changes Everything , 2014 .

[81]  Carsten Homburg,et al.  Determinants of Contract Terms for Professional Services , 2009 .

[82]  Willem H. Van Boom,et al.  Information Disclosure in the EU Consumer Credit Directive: Opportunities and Limitations , 2009 .

[83]  Jürgen Bock,et al.  Personalized Web Learning: Merging Open Educational Resources into Adaptive Courses for Higher Education , 2014, UMAP Workshops.

[84]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts , 2014, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[85]  B. Duivenvoorde.  The Consumer Benchmarks in the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive , 2015 .

[86]  Oded Maimon,et al.  A methodology for estimating the value of privacy in information disclosure systems , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[87]  Nojin Kwak,et al.  Affect, cognition and reward: Predictors of privacy protection online , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[88]  Alexander J. Wulf,et al.  Who Would Use the Common European Sales Law? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Border Consumer Contracts in the European Internal Market , 2016 .

[89]  Lauren E. Willis.  Against Financial Literacy Education , 2008 .

[90]  G. Helleringer.  Trust Me, I Have a Conflict of Interest! Testing the Efficacy of Disclosure in Retail Investment Advice , 2016 .

[91]  Natali Helberger,et al.  Diversity Label: Exploring the Potential and Limits of a Transparency Approach to Media Diversity , 2011, Journal of Information Policy.

[92]  K. Purnhagen,et al.  Homo Economicus, Behavioural Sciences, and Economic Regulation: On the Concept of Man in Internal Market Regulation and Its Normative Basis , 2012 .

[93]  Erica van Herpen,et al.  Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints , 2011, Appetite.

[94]  Jana Holsanova,et al.  New methods for studying visual communication and multimodal integration , 2012 .